Reply With Quote
So be it. Cannot take the heat when I make a valid point, or maybe it's too much of the GM 150.
What is GM 150 anyway?
Nope...I'm not playing anymore. You're trying too hard to troll at this point. This is where I drop you off on the curb and give you some cab fare.
So be it. Cannot take the heat when I make a valid point, or maybe it's too much of the GM 150.
What is GM 150 anyway?
http://www.shoppersvineyard.com/stor...720_f1128_1243
Now quit flailing your arms about.
Sorry WC, I didn't mean to upset you so. I only did it because I knew I could.
Looks like cools stuff.
Not flailing. I just can't believe anyone takes articles at 100%. Doesn't matter if they are fact or fiction. You expect to crack a joke for a fictional article, when articles of so called fact also have errors.
Yes, I am an oddball at times. I do like the "what ifs." Cracking a joke about it is meaningless. I see you and snake as the ones flailing. just our differing perspectives. can we try to understand those differences?
Why I wonder, does in your view, a question promoted by fiction have zero scientific basis?
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 12-02-2011 at 03:56 AM.
I guess I was poor at wording that. You depress me because I know you're better than you have portrayed yourself lately.
I'll ask you the same question.
Why does in your view, a question promoted by fiction have zero scientific basis?
You missed:
But Lab Director Stew Pidasso
Heh.
*say it out loud, like Ben Dover.
what's even more funny is that some dumbasses keep quoting this article as "truth *they* don't want you to know".
I'm surprised Parker hasn't glommed onto this well-written piece of satire.
1) Ain't nobody on fixed income now that was on fixed income then.
10) the fed has reduced the dollar's value more than 90% since it took hold of our currency. This robs citizens on fixed income and who diligently and save responsibily.
Most "fixed" income has colas. "Fixed" doesn't mean what you think it does
It must be. I saw it on the Alex Jones show.
I can't believe I completely missed that one...I feel like a stupid ass
Oh good, you weren't really depressed. Just playing the victim card to avoid admitting you didn't really read the article before commenting on it.
I really don't want debate the scientifc merit of an article by Ben Dover on Stew Pidasso's research.
Will you at least read the abstract? I mean it was written by Professor Emerita Amanda Huhgenkis. Can't get any better than that!
Probability- High
This isn't fiction. It's junk. I've seen no reaction, nuclear or otherwise which selectively "borrows" 4 protons from one nucleus and gives them to another.
After viewing the posts again I realize that I was responsible for detailing this thread. Apologies.
you were egged on. the tangent improved the thread ihmo.
I see.
Instead of even trying to understand I was taking a view of how science could be applied to a fictional story, you only want to play the mongoose.
Yes, the article is junk. Does that mean ideas prompted by it are automatically junk?
Interesting scientific views you have there.
You mean derailing, right?
Snake and I are to blame too. Maybe I should have started the new thread I asked for.
LOL...
True.
Usually I am the one complaining about derailing a thread. I didn't this time though. I am probably the worse offender for the hypocrisy aspect.
LOL...
He was the one who gave up though.
I think I've seen that cartoon before, but can't place it.
riki tiki tavi
from The Jungle Book
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
