CNN bringing up Racist Ron Paul rumors again

[scott]

It used to be overvalued, but with the advent of the legislative executive order and the implementation of legislation through executive regulatory agencies, that sentiment withers.

The trade off still exists.

[Blake]

Actually Ive said it before: this is about electing an outside set of philosophies and policies that will benefit us all. its about ideas to use a cliche.

Here is a letter from a black man who feels the same way.

http://www.dailypaul.com/194929/a-bl...r-to-the-media

...You see, the first flaw in the argument that Ron Paul is racist is that it doesn't matter. Society has shifted...

rofl

[Parker2112]

Lew is obviously racist.

Why hasn't Paul distanced himself from a noted racist that threw out racist articles under his name

Do you know he is racist? Do you know he wasnt using the newsletter to pander to extremists for support to broaden the base of the Libertarian party? Do either of us know that maybe RP doesnt actually know who wrote the stuff?

The neocons are trying to maintain a chokehold on the party. thats what this is about. He is about to win Iowa. They are trying to pull the rug out with the only thing they have.

http://www.unitedliberty.org/article...-its-the-right

[scott]

It's a good point. As Parker has shown us, your argument doesn't matter if we simply say they don't matter and instead apply your arguments to a different subject in which case they turn out to be wrong. The key, at that point, is that your argument is wrong!

[scott]

It's a good point. As Parker has shown us, your argument doesn't matter if we simply say they don't matter and instead apply your arguments to a different subject in which case they turn out to be wrong. The key, at that point, is that your argument is wrong!

Almost forgot:

[Parker2112]

rofl

But he is black, after all.

[Parker2112]

Almost forgot:

uhhh...no. Trophies are for me at this point. You'res dont count.

[scott]

uhhh...no. Trophies are for me at this point. You'res dont count.

lol... subtle victory here by Parker. You win the thread.

[Parker2112]

lol... subtle victory here by Parker. You win the thread.

[Parker2112]

Look out for me at the GTG. btw Ill be the one holding all the O'Brien trophies.

[Blake]

Do you know he is racist? Do you know he wasnt using the newsletter to pander to extremists for support to broaden the base of the Libertarian party? Do either of us know that maybe RP doesnt actually know who wrote the stuff?

Aside from simply saying "it wasn't me", it seems to me Ron could easily and quickly clear a lot of this up.

But he hasn't. It's still extremely murky.

[Blake]

But he is black, after all.

which is why it's so rofl

[DMX7]

Parker is just hoping that Ron didn't actually write those newsletters and that he isn't saying who did because he doesn't want to throw the supposed ghost writer, Lew Rockwell, under the bus, but I think the reality is Ron may not have written everything but he wrote enough to know that he'll get exposed completely for what he did write if he starts giving details and clarifying things.

[Bill_Brasky]

Still like racist ron over s bag newt and re perry tbh

[ChumpDumper]

How would you know about that if you never read the thing?

The thing?

What the are you even talking about now?

I read the racist parts of Paul's newsletters in question.

I read Paul's initial attempt to defend them, which proves he knew about them.

I read his further attempts to explain the racist articles in his newsletter, which amount to proof he's an idiot or an outright liar.

You are stupid chump and you use faulty logic. I proved it.

Logic leads me to conclude Ron Paul approved the racist articles that ran in his newsletter.

Or he's too stupid to run a 12-man operation.

Racist liar or stupid liar -- these are the only choices.

[Bill_Brasky]

Uncut interview:


CNN edited the footage to make it look worse than it was.

And nobody ever asks candidates tough questions, then when a candidate that they don't want starts to gain support they suddenly find their journalistic integrity(which was undermined by the fact that they edited the interview)?

[Wild Cobra]

I do like Paul the best of the remaining republicans. I always liked him, but felt his use of national protection less than what i believe in. His us of military is my only hangup about him.

[Jacob1983]

Is CNN trying to be like FOX News with that crafty editing?


I don't think Ron Paul is perfect but I just don't seem him as the racist type or the hardcore racist type. He is a huge supporter of civil liberties too. Has anyone heard what Rick Santorum and Mic e Bachmann say about Muslims? Rick Santorum has basically said that America is in a war against Muslims.

[Wild Cobra]

Is CNN trying to be like FOX News with that crafty editing?

They all do it. Liberals just point out every time Fox does it, and since every other network does it regular, nobody complains about the statuesque. It would be constant complaining.

[ChumpDumper]

lol statuesque

[DMX7]

"Nobody complains about the statuesque" is a very true statement.

[DMX7]

I'm statuesque by the way, and quite frankly, people love me.

[ChuckD]

I like the statuesque, especially if they're red heads. I don't care for a status quo redhead, though.

[RandomGuy]

They all do it. Liberals just point out every time Fox does it, and since every other network does it regular, nobody complains about the statuesque. It would be constant complaining.

?? statuesque ?

Status quo?

Quo Vadis?

[RandomGuy]

you never answered DMX7:

Originally Posted by DMX7

What is this?

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h1983-289


House Vote #289 (Aug 2, 1983)
TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND PASS H.R. 3706, A BILL AMENDING LE 5, UNITED STATES CODE TO MAKE THE BIRTHDAY OF MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., A LEGAL PUBLIC HOLIDAY. (MOTION PASSED;2/3 REQUIRED)

Nay TX-22 Paul, Ronald [R]

Dr. No also voted against the national do not call registry, a vote that got about as much support as the vote to go to war with Japan at the beginning of WW2.