Page 50 of 160 FirstFirst ... 4046474849505152535460100150 ... LastLast
Results 1,226 to 1,250 of 3983
  1. #1226
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    2,031
    That's for the grand jury to decide now.
    Correct. In the end, they will have all the evidence that would be used at trial. They can decide whether charges can and should be brought.

    The problem is that nothing is quick enough in our society. We want to jump right in and draw conclusions based on emotion.

    At this stage, I am going to presume that the evidence that people want leaked has been leaked. I have shared my conclusions or at least, the argument I would make if I were Zimmerman. I have no clue what the grand jury will do.
    elbamba is offline

  2. #1227
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,110
    This has got to be one of the dumbest lines of argument I have ever seen in here.

    Nowhere in the statute does it say that the victim has to wait until he is seeing the white light and baby jesus holding out his hand before he can defend himself.
    Maybe it's a racial thing?
    Wild Cobra is offline

  3. #1228
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,110
    I wonder why ABC didn't point either of those things out? I guess you'll just have to find another reason to hate, rather than putting down the rope for now.
    If news agencies stuck to the truth, they wouldn't profit so much on the stories.
    Wild Cobra is offline

  4. #1229
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    2,031
    Where's the kid's blood then? I never been in a situation of seeing someone shot (thank God) but wouldn't blood be spewed on you when you shoot a guy at such close proximity?
    That would be for an expert to determine. From your statement, you do not know and are speculating, which would be inadmissible.
    elbamba is offline

  5. #1230
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    128,201
    Why does ABC need to speculate like you do? It's not like they blurred it out.
    ChumpDumper is offline

  6. #1231
    Mr Robinsons hood denizen Creepn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    4,972
    I'm sure you're not interested in the fact that the video really does appear to show a gash on Zimmerman's head? Or the part where an officer checks out the back of his head for a few seconds? Why let facts get in the way of a good lynchin'?



    I wonder why ABC didn't point either of those things out? I guess you'll just have to find another reason to hate, rather than putting down the rope for now.
    IF that is a gash, that is enough to shoot dead a teen in a confrontation that he started?
    Creepn is offline

  7. #1232
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,559
    It's irrelevant? It's very relevant because their law states that if you feel you are on the verge of death or suffered "GREAT bodily harm" (actual text), that you can use deadly force.

    Looking at that video, I just don't see that "GREAT bodily harm". Plus he didn't even need to go to the hospital.
    Zimmerman: "I thought my life was in danger."

    Now the video is irrelevant.
    coyotes_geek is offline

  8. #1233
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    2,031
    With the ty job they've done overall, that's how I came to that conclusion.
    How do you know they have done a bad job?

    Did you know that during investigations, police departments routinely keep the files closed to the public. Usually records are turned over at the close of an investigation.

    Have you already concluded that Zimmerman should have been arrested and convicted?

    If so, based on what Florida law/ evidence?
    elbamba is offline

  9. #1234
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    40,703
    IF that is a gash, that is enough to shoot dead a teen in a confrontation that he started?
    Is this a hypothetical question with the premise that Zimmerman struck the first blow? I have seen no evidence of that and I'm pretty confident you haven't either.
    CosmicCowboy is offline

  10. #1235
    Mr Robinsons hood denizen Creepn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    4,972
    This has got to be one of the dumbest lines of argument I have ever seen in here.

    Nowhere in the statute does it say that the victim has to wait until he is seeing the white light and baby jesus holding out his hand before he can defend himself.
    It says GREAT bodily harm. GREAT bodily harm is WAY WAY WAY more than a gash on the head.
    Creepn is offline

  11. #1236
    Mr Robinsons hood denizen Creepn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    4,972
    Is this a hypothetical question with the premise that Zimmerman struck the first blow? I have seen no evidence of that and I'm pretty confident you haven't either.
    No, it's a fact that he started the WHOLE thing. Since the beginning.
    Creepn is offline

  12. #1237
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    2,031
    Doesn't matter. Great bodily harm injuries lasts for days.
    How do you know? What if most of the damage was internal? Would you be able to see it thirty minutes after the incident?
    elbamba is offline

  13. #1238
    Knowledge Is Hassle Fpoonsie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,674
    It says GREAT bodily harm. GREAT bodily harm is WAY WAY WAY more than a gash on the head.
    Are you using your extensive street brawl knowledge to make such a claim?
    Fpoonsie is offline

  14. #1239
    Mr Robinsons hood denizen Creepn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    4,972
    How do you know? What if most of the damage was internal? Would you be able to see it thirty minutes after the incident?
    Then he would've went to the hospital. He was cleared on the spot.
    Creepn is offline

  15. #1240
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,110
    It says GREAT bodily harm. GREAT bodily harm is WAY WAY WAY more than a gash on the head.
    It doesn't matter.

    Just how far does the victim have to be beat, if he thinks it's going to get worse, before he takes drastic measures?

    Are you saying he has to wait until St. Peter says it's OK?
    Wild Cobra is offline

  16. #1241
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    40,703
    Here's what the statute actually says dumbass...

    Fla. Stat. § 776.012. Use of force in defense of person

    A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:

    (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony
    It says PREVENT great bodily harm, not that he has to SUSTAIN great bodily harm.

    When Martin was pounding his head on the concrete there was a clear and indisputable possibility of great bodily harm.
    CosmicCowboy is offline

  17. #1242
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    2,031
    Then he would've went to the hospital. He was cleared on the spot.
    Are you sure he was cleared? I read that he rejected further medical attention.

    But to your other point. Can you tell me how Florida defines "Great Bodily Harm". You have alleged that his injuries do not meet this prerequisite for self-defense. Please support with a definition within the Florida Statutes or Florida Caselaw.
    elbamba is offline

  18. #1243
    Mr Robinsons hood denizen Creepn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    4,972
    Are you using your extensive street brawl knowledge to make such a claim?
    I have seen way worse injuries in a street fight and a gun was neither pulled nor the guy that inflicted the damage go to jail for attempted murder.
    Creepn is offline

  19. #1244
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    40,703
    No, it's a fact that he started the WHOLE thing. Since the beginning.
    Damn you are an idiot.

    Even assuming Zimmerman verbally confronted Martin Zimmerman could have talked all the he wanted and it's not an assault. Zimmerman may be an asshole but if he didn't throw the first punch it's not an assault.

    Martin punching Zimmerman in the nose, however WAS an assault.

    Pounding Zimmermans head into the concrete was a clear threat of great bodily harm.

    Zimmerman may be a total asshole but under the Florida law he seems to be well within his right to cap Martin.
    CosmicCowboy is offline

  20. #1245
    Veteran cantthinkofanything's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    14,937
    I have seen way worse injuries in a street fight and a gun was neither pulled nor the guy that inflicted the damage go to jail for attempted murder.
    So if someone is sitting on you bashing your head in the ground, you're supposed to wait until you know you're incurring life threatening damage?

    And remember, at this point, Zimmerman thought Martin might use the Skittles on him.
    cantthinkofanything is offline

  21. #1246
    Veteran Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,555
    You mean how unreliable it can be?
    Can be yes. Did not mean to imply it always is.
    However the show did an excellent job of showing how it more often then not is unreliable. Gave some stunning examples. In a very nice twist, the gal who put away a guy for years (and yes he is black) was just absolutely positive she had i.d.'d him correctly as her rapist. Years later forensics proved him innocent and the real perp was caught. Now black guy and she go around the country advocating against eyewitness testimony (well, advocating against it being used to lock up innocent people). The show might be watchable on CBSs archives. Im not sure about that but if you see it i predict you will really enjoy it. Very well done.
    Fabbs is offline

  22. #1247
    Mr Robinsons hood denizen Creepn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    4,972
    So if someone is sitting on you bashing your head in the ground, you're supposed to wait until you know you're incurring life threatening damage?

    And remember, at this point, Zimmerman thought Martin might use the Skittles on him.
    Martin was the one facing imminent threat when Zimmerman had a gun.
    Creepn is offline

  23. #1248
    Mr Robinsons hood denizen Creepn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    4,972
    Damn you are an idiot.

    Even assuming Zimmerman verbally confronted Martin Zimmerman could have talked all the he wanted and it's not an assault. Zimmerman may be an asshole but if he didn't throw the first punch it's not an assault.

    Martin punching Zimmerman in the nose, however WAS an assault.

    Pounding Zimmermans head into the concrete was a clear threat of great bodily harm.

    Zimmerman may be a total asshole but under the Florida law he seems to be well within his right to cap Martin.
    Punching somebody in the nose if somebody else assaulted you first is not assault. We need to move on from this "who started the first physical attack" phase because we just don't know.

    No one even knows if his head was even "pounded" on the pavement and Team Zimmerman already lied in this case.
    Creepn is offline

  24. #1249
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    55,673
    let's see:
    - nobody knows who threw the first punch
    - nobody knows the extent of Z's injuries
    - nobody knows what evidence the victim's body has to account for the incident

    we know nothing. ppl arguing on either side are mainly talking
    hater is offline

  25. #1250
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    Why does ABC need to speculate like you do? It's not like they blurred it out.
    LOL... but they did say that there were no signs of any head injury, even though that was a lie. And they did overlay their logo and other text over Zimmerman's head, right at the time that the mark was visible. (Strangely, now that they've been outed, they have removed the overlay on that part of the video.) But, hey, why let facts get in your way? You never did before.


    Now jump, puppet. Think of some other excuse.
    GSH is offline

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •