Reply With Quote
Exactly This, and what do you know, we almost lost the last game with Pop almost reverting back to Bonner ball in the 4th. Thank God, he finally put Diaw back in.
Exactly This, and what do you know, we almost lost the last game with Pop almost reverting back to Bonner ball in the 4th. Thank God, he finally put Diaw back in.
wasnt diaw in foul trouble?
Be careful, your making sense.
lol screaming for years.
You started this screaming thread last month and were screaming about Tim and Tiago not being paired together.
Have they really played that many minutes together to make you stop screaming, or are you pretending like Pop did what you said he should so you could squeeze your way onto the band wagon?
lol not one mention of Diaw in this non screaming post.
Pop was also using Bonner to intentionally foul. I doubt he's going to do that with Diaw when Diaw is in foul trouble.
Yeah, I squeezed onto the bandwagon in 1973.
Guilty.
You hated the coach of the year and were screaming at him last month
lol Popsuckers still butthurt that their God is questioned.
rofl frequent meltdowner calling anyone that doesn't go along with his meltdowns a popsucker
It wasn't a meltdown-it was a lucky thread for the Spurs.
They haven't lost since. Pop changed and/or amended his ways.
Just say thanks and continue with your Cuck life. Is that so hard for you?
If Pop goes back to boneheaded coaching-I'll take a bullet and call him out again and the Spurs can go on another winning streak.
Recognize genius when you see it.
I'll call YOU-jenius.
your hop onto the popsucker bandwagon is duly noted.
No others, including me, wonder how you keeping posting ty takes and then try to backtrack. It further cements your stupidity tbh.
Please have an functioning adult in the room, when posting. Thanks.Exactly This, and what do you know, we almost lost the last game with Pop almost reverting back to Bonner ball in the 4th. Thank God, he finally put Diaw back in.
jj-kt-kk sighting!
/thread IQ lowered
Yeah Diaw is going to be the guy here. If Ibaka is going to leave him open he really needs to let it fly this series.
Not like it had any IQ to begin with...
Irony at it's finest...
Welcome, brand new Popsucker-sheeple.
Since damn near everything the OP lamented about out in the thread was finally implemented in the next game by Pop I fail to see the irony. You Popsuckers should be heaping praises not hurling insults.
Unless,... are you instead implying that Pop should have instead kept the status quo? Which was Blair starting and Bonner being the first big off the bench? I guess that's the collective wisdom from the popsuckers. They'd rather save face by losing (and making more lame excuses later) than make the necessary changes and start winning.
Chumpdumper inc in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.. with his "But but but.. the spurs were 29-2 nothing needing changing!!! Your spelling sucks!! Blah blah blah!!!"
Pophaters Inc trying to do damage control.Since damn near everything the OP lamented about out in the thread was finally implemented in the next game by Pop I fail to see the irony. You Popsuckers should be heaping praises not hurling insults.
Unless,... are you instead implying that Pop should have instead kept the status quo? Which was Blair starting and Bonner being the first big off the bench? I guess that's the collective wisdom from the popsuckers. They'd rather save face by losing (and making more lame excuses later) than make the necessary changes and start winning.
Chumpdumper inc in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.. with his "But but but.. the spurs were 29-2 nothing needing changing!!! Your spelling sucks!! Blah blah blah!!!"
Its really funny that you and your buds really dont' realize the holes you dig on here. Keep cementing your legacy on here Nostradumbass.Since damn near everything the OP lamented about out in the thread was finally implemented in the next game by Pop I fail to see the irony. You Popsuckers should be heaping praises not hurling insults.
Unless,... are you instead implying that Pop should have instead kept the status quo? Which was Blair starting and Bonner being the first big off the bench? I guess that's the collective wisdom from the popsuckers. They'd rather save face by losing (and making more lame excuses later) than make the necessary changes and start winning.
Chumpdumper inc in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.. with his "But but but.. the spurs were 29-2 nothing needing changing!!! Your spelling sucks!! Blah blah blah!!!"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
