You're missing the point
CD tosses around the commission report like a Bible. He says to people who did not read it that they are wrong, end of story.
I am using his logic to ask a simple question he only just now answered after years of heckeling.
When you take his logic one step further against his own position, it's self.chumpdumping.
He does not personally know anything about how massive steel girders would react in a massive sky scraper hit by a giant airplane, but claims to be always right involving discussions about a terrorist attack involvingam airplane hitting a giant sky scraper composed of steel girders.
If he does not personally read the scientific literature on such subjects, he is just as ignorant about the actual attack as someone who hasn't read the report.
The nut jobs who claim conspiracy point to scientific literature and select professional knowledge to sport their claim.
im not saying those claims are right or wrong. I've never presumed to know everything about 9/11.
CD always asks nut jobs to flesh out their theories, specifically, to show holes in their beliefs.
Im asking CD to flesh out his knowledge of something pretty fundamental to the attack, to show a hole in his beliefs.
when you get down to the actual buildings collapsing he is just as ignorant as anyone else.