Page 6 of 17 FirstFirst ... 234567891016 ... LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 422
  1. #126
    Mr.Assistant Duncan2177's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    1,796
    I wonder If Manu and Tiago will talk him into joining the spurs.

  2. #127
    Delonte West fanclub pres lakerhaterade's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    1,673
    Spurs drafted Splitter and they are very close friends. Scola by that time was fed up with the Spurs front office. I think part of the reason the Spurs finally gave in and traded Scola was to make nice and look good for Splitter who they would be trying to sign the next summer. Splitter knew all about Scola's issues with the Spurs.
    case in point all those twitter pics on manu's twitter profile

  3. #128
    Make a trade steal
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    7,948
    How about an all white lineup of Splitter, Scola, Ginobili, De Colo, and Bonner. How bizarre would that be?!? (for the record I am less enthused about keeping Bonner than even Blair).

    Scola is not perfect but he represents a potential roster upgrade so I am excited that may be possible, especially after the "Lorbek letdown." We just need to get a little bit better and changing out our weakest links is the way to do it. Scola is a warrior at heart and I think he would mesh well with our team.
    All white lineups don't win in the NBA.

  4. #129
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    540
    Overall. I think RC screwed up the negotiation with Scola and eventually made a wrong decision to trade him. It was history and I don't see Scola want to be a SPURS if he has opportunity to choose the team he played.

  5. #130
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,774
    I would take him as an upgrade over Bonner/Blair. RC's got to stop with the nonsense that the frontcourt is fine with Bonner and Blair. No frontcourt with that combination is fine.

  6. #131
    Play Murray+White Fireball's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Post Count
    8,467
    A frontcourt with Duncan, Diaw, Splitter, Scola and even Blair would be a thing of beauty regarding their passing abilities. Our offense would be even more potent than last season. But I still think we should adress the defensive challenges ...

  7. #132
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    18,308
    Scola would be a clear upgrade over Bonner and Blair but he won't be a that good fit because Spurs need first a good defender and Scola is a poor one.

    What Spurs should do is crystal clear. First, they have to wait to see if Scola clear waivers or not. Second, if he clears waivers, they had to offer him the best contract they can (2 years min salary with a player option on the second year). Third, if the get him they had to trade Blair for the best offer they can get.

    At the end, getting Scola for the min would be a good move but I would rather see Spurs getting a PF that is a better defender through a little trade.

  8. #133
    '99/'03/'05/'07 MmP's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    1,021
    I don't agree he's a bad defender. He's not great, but he moves well and he's smart too. I'd say he's a cheaper version of Oberto on D. He's a hard worker on the court, just like Manu. Pair him up with Ginobili on the pick and roll and we might be unstoppable. Pair him up with Tiago on the High-Low and we can have a great bench, they played a couple of years together.

    It'd be a dream to have Scola over, finally.

  9. #134
    Veteran Wild Cobra Kai's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Supersonics
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Post Count
    1,941
    Scola would be a clear upgrade over Bonner and Blair but he won't be a that good fit because Spurs need first a good defender and Scola is a poor one.

    What Spurs should do is crystal clear. First, they have to wait to see if Scola clear waivers or not. Second, if he clears waivers, they had to offer him the best contract they can (2 years min salary with a player option on the second year). Third, if the get him they had to trade Blair for the best offer they can get.

    At the end, getting Scola for the min would be a good move but I would rather see Spurs getting a PF that is a better defender through a little trade.
    They've tried to move him, and had no takers so far. That's OK. His contract for next year is fully UN guaranteed if cut by a certain date. Cut him loose.

  10. #135
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    18,308
    They've tried to move him, and had no takers so far. That's OK. His contract for next year is fully UN guaranteed if cut by a certain date. Cut him loose.
    Well, I can easily see some teams offering one or two 2nd round picks for Blair. For the moment, Spurs rather keep Blair because he is more valuable to them than that. If they get Scola, it will change with Blair dropping even more in the teams depth chart and Spurs should take an offer like that.

  11. #136
    Veteran bklynspursfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Post Count
    15,095
    Miami just won the le without someone in the middle to be an enforcer. Sure we don't have a Lebron James, but if our wing guys can play GREAT (not good) defense, then I would be fine with getting a Scola vs. someone who will protect the rim. Make it harder for teams to get to the basket.

    Not to mention this would potentially give us someone who is fully capable of operating in the post and has a deadly mid-range shot.

  12. #137
    Make a trade steal
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    7,948
    Scola is another below the rim big. The Spurs have a team full of them.

  13. #138
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    291
    1.Is it possible that no team would claim Scola?

    Mavs seems like him (and Brand) a lot and they can claim both.

    2.Is it possible that Scola would like to accept the Min?

    I heard that he had a poor relationship with Spurs FO when he was in Euro. But meanwhile he is a good friend of Splitter and Manu.

  14. #139
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    291
    When is the deadline for teams to claim Scola?

  15. #140
    Veteran temujin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,408
    Luifa is a warrior and a champion.
    NExt year, he is going to be on a mission, to prove these idiots wrong.
    Whoever gets him will make a huge steal.

    I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think it's going to be the Spurs.

  16. #141
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    4,488
    You have to think that IF he clears waivers, the Spurs are the front runners to land him. Sure Scola's relationship with RC isn't the best, but his best friends are here + there is no need to haggle over salary since its already set for the 32 years old PF.

    I have my doubts that he'll be claimed. There are rumblings of several serviceable bigmen being amnestied (Thomas, Blatche) to add to those who already have (Brand, Haywood, Darko) for teams to choose from, and a dwindling amount of teams with the sufficient cap space to take on Scola's even reduced salary. Not to mention their are other potential amnesty cuts at other positions.

  17. #142
    Veteran dunkman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    2,825
    Scola is exactly the type of player the Spurs need. When the defenses get tight in the playoffs, he can get his shot going. Duncan and Manu used to do that, but that's not the case anymore.

    The team also needs a third defensive center. Darko or Kwame.

  18. #143
    Goin' for tha scholarship Budkin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    22,475
    Pretty sure the Mavs will win the bidding.

  19. #144
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    58,114
    Hopefully Scola doesn't get claimed. Not only will that give the Spurs the chance to add a solid player for the minimum, it'd finally end the debate of how much Scola ever wanted to be a Spur. During all the Scola drama, Scola's camp always painted the picture that Scola was desperate to sign with the Spurs and loved the organization. The Spurs were always skeptical of that claim.

    If Scola doesn't sign with the Spurs even though he's already getting paid handsomely from the Rockets just for going away, it'll prove that Scola never really liked the Spurs as much as his camp said. San Antonio has an obvious need to replace Blonnair and probably his two closest friends in the NBA in Ginobili and Splitter. If no one wants to pay him $10 million over three years, there shouldn't be an amount of money that persuades him to go anywhere else other than the Spurs, tbh.

  20. #145
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    291
    If no one wants to pay him $10 million over three years, there shouldn't be an amount of money that persuades him to go anywhere else other than the Spurs, tbh.
    I don't get it.

    Teams could just offer $1m per year to claim him and see if someone offered more.

    Am I missing something?

  21. #146
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    4,488
    Pretty sure the Mavs will win the bidding.
    Im not so sure. Not only are they interested in Brand, but I read this morning that they'll jump on Calderon if Toronto cuts him loose. Mavs dont have as much money as they did a week ago.

  22. #147
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,623
    I don't get it.

    Teams could just offer $1m per year to claim him and see if someone offered more.

    Am I missing something?
    Yes you're missing something. A page or two earlier it was explained that the minimum bid for Scola would have to equal his lowest yearly salary of his current contract ($10M), which they can prorate over the three remaining years of his contract, or $3.3M/yr.

  23. #148
    GO SPURS GO! hooperflash's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    3,409
    We have boring off seasons but entertaining regular seasons..

  24. #149
    Make a trade steal
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    7,948
    You have to think that IF he clears waivers, the Spurs are the front runners to land him. Sure Scola's relationship with RC isn't the best, but his best friends are here + there is no need to haggle over salary since its already set for the 32 years old PF.

    I have my doubts that he'll be claimed. There are rumblings of several serviceable bigmen being amnestied (Thomas, Blatche) to add to those who already have (Brand, Haywood, Darko) for teams to choose from, and a dwindling amount of teams with the sufficient cap space to take on Scola's even reduced salary. Not to mention their are other potential amnesty cuts at other positions.
    Agree with this post. Scola will clear waivers.

    Scola will be on the Spurs. Scola is the type of player that the Spurs get. He is foreign, has freinds on the team that he is used to playing with and is a former player that they had the rights to.


    He also won't be enough of a difference maker in the end. A perfect fit for a Spur acquisition.

  25. #150
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    291
    Yes you're missing something. A page or two earlier it was explained that the minimum bid for Scola would have to equal his lowest yearly salary of his current contract ($10M), which they can prorate over the three remaining years of his contract, or $3.3M/yr.
    Oh, thanks.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •