Reply With Quote
if for the sake of high drama we assume all 7613 of those presumably dead people are all dead, and all active voters, in a state with ~14.5 million voters that comes to about five one hundredths of one percent statewide.
According to this guy they are dead people so I guess the correct answer is both.
It's fraudulent either way no?
if for the sake of high drama we assume all 7613 of those presumably dead people are all dead, and all active voters, in a state with ~14.5 million voters that comes to about five one hundredths of one percent statewide.
how about the link to the Ohio voter fraud? your Florida case failed at delivery.
7,613 down
2,992,387 to go
You will dismiss it on arrival so why bother?
Someone tell Trump to investigate this matter. Maybe even make a Special Committee.
it's not my fault your case failed at delivery. you overhyped it, you made unverified assumptions.
also, if you don't care to support your own claims, so much the worse for your claims.
ran off.
Chris can't be bothered to back up his own bs.
Thread Information
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (2 members and 0 guests)
You just want a back and forth bicker.
No thanks!
That news was already debunked. I'd post the thread debunking it, but you wouldn't read it.
you can't back up your own bs.
that's ok. everyone can see it for what it is.
YOU JUST WANT A BACK AND FORTH BICKER. NO THANKS!
You just want a back and forth bicker.
No thanks!
chicken Chris
You're doing the troll thing again.
in this case I would say chicken is more descriptive than pejorative.
You either have no number sense, or you are a chicken .
You are getting your ass handed to you.
what do you call someone who makes a bold claim, and then refuses to back it up and runs away from the bold claim?
Somebody here said that was like.. hmmm.. 14%...
Quit trolling, Chris.
Fraud involves intent.
So, no.
Basically you have someone named Joe Smith voting, and the poll worker finding the first Joe Smith on the roll and marking that person as having voted, when in reality it ws the 3rd Joe Smith that voted, not the 1st.
Simple clerical error on the part of volunteer poll workers.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...rm=chicken
Seems to fit the definition of chicken in a very real sense.
As in:
A person is chicken if they make bold claims, then run away from those claims at the first sign of challenge.
Chris makes bold claims, then runs away from those claims at the first sign of challenge.
Chis is, therefore, chicken . QED
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
