Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 43
  1. #1
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,635
    So I liked all 3 prospective bigs...

    Powell: Young, energetic, he's much more polished than your regular scrub. He looks ready for an NBA job.
    Brown: Also young and energetic. Never looked out of place, even when playing with TD.
    Curry: Intriguing... he looks really slim so you know he's been putting effort there. He's strong, has size and like Jack seems like a tough customer.

    I would take any of those 3 as the 4th big right now, over even Bonner and Blair... unfortunately, ginger is staying and taking that 4th spot, so there's no room for most of them.

    However, due to Splitter seemingly never ending injuries, I think we're going to keep one of them as insurance. We're way too stacked at the guard, and for wings, Khawi, Jack and Green should give us what we need.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Veteran Libri's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    11,209
    Which of those three has the highest bb iq?

  3. #3
    Lol Crews jjktkk's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    6,420
    I'd take Curry and Brown.

  4. #4
    Believe. jeebus's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Post Count
    19,777
    Whoever plays best defense. The Spurs are guaranteed to get butt ed on national tv against the Lakers if Bonner/Blair duo is in the game at the same time

  5. #5
    spurs 4 life Manu-20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    992
    I like Curry he played Duncan quit well at times and I think he could be a very good 4th big man option but of course there is bonner and for as bad as splitter is staying healthy he is still a very good role player for the spurs when healthy, so it's tough to say who can earn a roster spot and make an impact but so far all 3 of those guys look like they can be of an assist to the spurs.

  6. #6
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,635
    Whoever plays best defense. The Spurs are guaranteed to get butt ed on national tv against the Lakers if Bonner/Blair duo is in the game at the same time
    That's why Curry is intriguing. The tools are there.

    All 3 are hungry, but Curry might be the literal kind. The risk is that you hand him a contract and he moves permanently to Whataburger.

  7. #7
    Veteran justinandimcool's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    1,181
    only one can help against Howard/Gasol. the big one.

  8. #8
    Don't believe the hype... ChuckD's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    4,510
    only one can help against Howard/Gasol. the big one.
    Curry's not much of a defender.

  9. #9
    4 down spursince#99's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Post Count
    1,421
    Curry's not much of a defender.

    he did well on TD today

  10. #10
    Don't believe the hype... ChuckD's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    4,510
    he did well on TD today
    1. It's a scrimmage
    2. Tim is 35, and NOT representative of the breed of quick, off the dribble PFs the league has today.
    3. If Eddy can only defend big and slow, he cannot play with Tim, since Tim can only defend that type. He'd be stealing Splitter's minutes as Tim's backup.

  11. #11
    MVParker racm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    6,787
    1. It's a scrimmage
    2. Tim is 35, and NOT representative of the breed of quick, off the dribble PFs the league has today.
    3. If Eddy can only defend big and slow, he cannot play with Tim, since Tim can only defend that type. He'd be stealing Splitter's minutes as Tim's backup.
    Tim's a full-time center now. A center who takes more jumpers than back-to-the-basket types than the likes of Howard, but a center nonetheless.

  12. #12
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    40,714
    As much as I have always liked Brown and still like him, I think Powell is the best fit from a need perspective. The Spurs really need a true power forward and he's closer to that then any of the other prospects.

  13. #13
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Post Count
    1,255
    I wonder if Pop will play Tim and Tiago together a bit more against big lineups like the Lakers/Grizzlies. That would open up some minutes for Curry.

  14. #14
    MVParker racm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    6,787
    As much as I have always liked Brown and still like him, I think Powell is the best fit from a need perspective. The Spurs really need a true power forward and he's closer to that then any of the other prospects.
    6'9" ain't something to shake a stick at. Dice was that size and contributed, shame he had little left in the tank.

  15. #15
    Don't believe the hype... ChuckD's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    4,510
    6'9" ain't something to shake a stick at. Dice was that size and contributed, shame he had little left in the tank.
    Exactly. I'm not a concerned about size when you're talking like 1 inch from optimum. His standing reach and wingspan are larger than Blair's who is a freak in that department. Brown is about 5-10 pounds lighter than David West, and no one has a problem considering HIM a PF.

    Brown is a plus defender, and that is what we need on this squad. Put Chip to work re-gaining the 3 pointer he had in college and you have an instant swing forward who can legitimately defend 2-4.

  16. #16
    MVParker racm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    6,787
    6'9" is typical for PFs - weight and wingspan matter more.

  17. #17
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,342
    hows currys heart condition?

  18. #18
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    18,669
    Powell is 29 years old, I wouldn't call him young.

  19. #19
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    40,714
    I see Powell as closer to being a right now contributor than Brown. His game doesn't really need any polishing and he's played exclusively at PF for over 300 regular season games and 40 playoff games. With only Bonner and Blair being the options I'd much rather see a player that has spent a lot of time at PF being the fall back over a player that is more of a tweener. I would see Brown as more of an eventual Jackson replacement.

    The Spurs are trying to win now and need players that can play now. Powell seems like he would be closer to that as a PF.

  20. #20
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    6,529
    curry could barely play defense in his prime. he's not going to start now. it's like when spurstalk expected drew gooden to play defense. at least blair tries.

  21. #21
    The Boognish FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,830
    curry could barely play defense in his prime. he's not going to start now. it's like when spurstalk expected drew gooden to play defense. at least blair tries.
    Blair tries? i guess you are watching a different pnr defender than I recall. He doesn't even give as much effort as he once did on the defensive glass anymore.

  22. #22
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    13,968
    As much as I have always liked Brown and still like him, I think Powell is the best fit from a need perspective. The Spurs really need a true power forward and he's closer to that then any of the other prospects.
    He is a true PF, but from strictly a positional perspective, that's what they need least out of the three front court positions. And he brings nothing the other PF's don't.

    Ultimately, I think it comes down to Brown or Powell. I still think Brown is the odds on favorite, but if Powell makes it, it'll be as Splitter insurance (he's no C, but they haven't had a problem in recent years playing 6-9 or under guys, who can't protect the rim, at C). It won't be to compete with Blair and Bonner.

  23. #23
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    40,714


    The Spurs need a true PF less than the other positions? And who are the other PF's on the roster besides Diaw?

  24. #24
    R.C. Drunkford TimDunkem's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    13,927
    He is a true PF, but from strictly a positional perspective, that's what they need least out of the three front court positions. And he brings nothing the other PF's don't.

    Ultimately, I think it comes down to Brown or Powell. I still think Brown is the odds on favorite, but if Powell makes it, it'll be as Splitter insurance (he's no C, but they haven't had a problem in recent years playing 6-9 or under guys, who can't protect the rim, at C). It won't be to compete with Blair and Bonner.
    Just a bad take all around.

  25. #25
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    13,968


    The Spurs need a true PF less than the other positions? And who are the other PF's on the roster besides Diaw?
    You can't seriously be this dumb, can you?

    We're talking depth wise, not legit starters. Obviously, they could use an upgrade at starting PF, but do they just need another body at the position? No, because they already have three rotation caliber ones. Whereas at C and SF, they have two.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •