Of course Houston will play their starters. They won't have home field or the division wrapped up yet.
Like I said, go back to lurking.
Of course Houston will play their starters. They won't have home field or the division wrapped up yet.
And still lost to Jacksonville and the Jets
MVP
It'll be some good games then. They play back to back IIRC
Sorry The Batman (lame poster btw, never noticed him/her until maybe last week in a thread like this. Between Lincoln and the other 2 wigs there isn't any room for you on that wagon
Why does djohn2008 feel like logging into Batman in order to argue for black QBs?
Yeah it's true they have good backs but the dots doesn't lead a person with a brain to think that Wilson is a ty qb. no. He's a huge player in their success.
Look at his passing stats, compare them with Luck's, then let me know if he's still a ty qb.
What do you think the Seahawks and Colts records are if the 2 players switched teams?
If the Colts called the Seahawks and offered Luck for Wilson, how long do you think it would take the Seahawks to accept, 2 or 3 seconds?
A real response for once would be nice from creepn instead of some typical response like mane wilson be makin sum good plays n .
Seahawks are comfortably in 1st place in the West probably. Luck has been impressive. Next season will be the litmus test though tbh.
Why in the would they trade for a quarterback doing worse than Wilson? Luck is a ing turnover machine. Seahawks would just laugh and hang up the phone. Colts would be a laughing stock on the ESPN panels.
Lol trading a top 10 quarterback for a lower tier qb.
If Wilson played for the Colts, they would've been first in the division a long ass time ago.
Andrew Luck couldn't hold RGIII or Russell Wilsons jock strap, let's be honest about it. Both have outplayed him this season, while they are throwing TD's he's throwing INT's. Most important of all QB stats, turnovers.
Heading into this week RGIII and RW were ranked in the top 7 where was Luck....29th!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How many INT's did Luck throw this week
Save all the usual crap, I like the facts better.
But.....unlike you rookies I know better than to but too much into a game or a season. Luck might be the next big thing, but for now he's sucking hind .
Last edited by Avante; 12-10-2012 at 04:55 AM.
I thought your stupid welching ass was leaving this site, what happened?
If you actually believe this and actually think the Seahawks would reject a Wilson for Luck trade, your mother must have done some serious drugs when she was pregnant.
I'm on board with the whole black qb suck because of the whole running out of control until they have more broken ribs than not. Temptation is an ugly and dudes just can't seem to resist running when there is no easy reciever to throw to. Despite liking both RG3 and RW, i still think they will fail in the long run and would take almost any starting white qb over them.
Post doesn't count cause you're leaving this forum remember?
What are you talking about? Black qbs don't even run the ball all that much. You make it around they run every single play lol.
How can you say black qbs suck when majority of black led teams are in upper tier in their division, high completion rates, high ratings, ect.?
Ignorance is a mutha a around here.
because they don't last long enough to let the FO stack them with talent.
What does Luck have over Wilson again?
What is up with the "cramming Luck down our throats" parade? If he's as good as you say, you guys shouldn't have to. No one is cramming Manning down. Or Rodgers. Or whoever that is better than Luck right now.
the same could be said for Wilson or Griffin
I wanna hear you flat out say it so I have the quote. If Indy called Seattle and offered Luck for Wilson, do you really think Seattle would reject it?
As far as what Luck has over Wilson, he doesn't need play action to complete passes, and is tall enough where he can actually see over the pocket.
Heeeeell no the same cannot be said. You guys create new Luck threads every time he beats a crappy team and scream "ROY" or "MVP!" whereas RG3 and Wilson been beating divisional leaders with little fanfare. So although Wilson is shorter, he still manages a better passer rating than Luck, and that's a negative?
I already answered your phone call question in the previous page. Please quote me.
I don't lump RG3 in with the Vince Youngs and Mike Vicks. Being completely objective: He's smart (can read defenses), super athletic and has a strong arm. I don't think many people are trying to argue that.
The reason I'd take Luck over Griffin is because of the risk of injury associated with each. Comparing either Luck or RG3 to Russell Wilson is stupid.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)