Reply With Quote
Can you provide an example?
and...
do you happen to be Jewish?
OK, so why do Jews allow themselves to be parodied and stereotyped regularly in movies and television?
Can you provide an example?
and...
do you happen to be Jewish?
every stock Jewish character who handles money and can't play sports ever.
No (lol enlightened labels).and...
do you happen to be Jewish?
Why do you want to make everything so personal?
Because you take everything personally?
Tyler Perry movies have made about half a billion dollars, for example.
Then you have Mo' Better Blues. According to you, a bunch of Jews gave a black man a bunch of money to make a film about a musician who wasn't a convict or a rapper and had a negative portrayal of Jewish nightclub owners to boot.
Roger Ebert gives you a
A righteous media controlling Jew if ever there were one.
Because they chug Xanax by the bottle and harbor deep bitterness about their minimum-wage retail job, tbh.....
So Tyler Perry is a jew?
So, e Lee is a Jew?Then you have Mo' Better Blues. According to you, a bunch of Jews gave a black man a bunch of money to make a film about a musician who wasn't a convict or a rapper and had a negative portrayal of Jewish nightclub owners to boot.
Roger Ebert gives you a
Not making it personal - just wondered if you had labeled yourself Jewish.
Asking someone a question about themselves is inherently personal.
He seemed to take offense because I told the truth about Jewish Hollywood....so I wondered if he was jewish.
He questioned your assertion. He didn't seem to be offended by it.
But in either case, it's pretty silly to ask someone a personal question and then argue that you're not making it personal.
Ok, thanks chumpie!
I have to say that the insults toward me in this thread have been very unoriginal and bland. Put some effort into it. I just see the weak effort and delivery as being lazy.
Why do people get upset and pissy when someone says that Hollywood is mostly controlled by Jewish people? That's just the way it is. It's like saying that the best basketball players in the NBA are black. It's just the way it is.
Why do you get pissy over gay marriage?
And maybe if you stop acting like some emo flip flopping got we would take you seriously
When did I flip flop on gay marriage? I don't give a about it to be honest.
being gay isn't a "State" its deviant behavior people just cowardly label as something they can't help or own up to.
FACT.
You keep flip flopping about caring/not caring about it. If you didn't really care, you would have left this thread, but you insist to stay and keep trying to compare it to polygamy.
Are you asking me if I care if sexuals can or can't get married? If that's the question, then no. If I'm going to take a polygraph, I will say no. I honestly do not care if gay marriage is legal or illegal. It does not affect me either way. Why does that make me a bigot or a Bible thumper? Explain that to me. I am in' neutral basically on the issue.
As a side issue that splits off from this issue, one might ask what interest is it of the federal (or state) government to promote marriage or to promote people having kids? It was of some interest at the end of WWI and WWII, but not anymore. When you provide a tax break, you are promoting something. It should not be the business of the state or federal government to inject itself into these issues. As such there should not be provisions in the tax code that give preferential treatment to those who are married or with kids. If you can afford children, have them. Don't count on a handout from the fed to support them. If you can afford a spouse, get married. Don't count on the tax break. If you want a house, buy one you can afford. Don't count on the tax break. Taxes would be so much simpler if you took out all the things that the fed (and some states) have no business promoting.
As to the issue SCOTUS was hearing, perhaps the fed shouldn't be so concerned with whether you are married or not, but rather if it is a benefit, then just allow you to name a beneficiary. No need to be married to them at all. Simplify and move on.
As to the estate tax issue SCOTUS heard, again, allow a person to name a beneficiary and that person would not have to pay taxes on the house. Otherwise, do not give one benefit to married people and not to others. If you can't do the name a beneficiary thing, then eliminate the entire spouse doesn't pay estate tax provision.
lol wanting desperately to label me
nah, just trying to see why you are denying that Jews control/dominate hollywood/media... you took it wrong is all...
Not denying their positions in power, just your stupid conclusions you drew from them.
Then you flip-flopped and tried to say Tyler Perry and e Lee control Hollywood. Make up your mind.
And yeah, it was personal. No other reason to ask it.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
