He also threw about half as many passes, had a better offensive line, had a running back that put up offense, and just happened to play QB for the team ranked #1 in total defense. He was on a 10-6 team that got one of the luckiest breaks of all time when the replacement refs gave them a free win to get to 11 wins, whilst Luck won all 11 of his team's games, and put up all of those interceptions in the first 75% of the season.
All you do is look at stats and see Luck's interceptions and talk about his ROOKIE SEASON. Luck had more picks than the other two guys, but he also took more sacks and was running from a broken pocket on almost every single play. It is not my fault that you didn't watch Colts games and don't know this. Maybe pull your eyes off of last season's stat sheet and realize the Colts greatly improved their offensive line and changed their offense to the one Luck is absolutely most comfortable with. If he has 68+% completion and 3:1 on TD:INT this season I wouldn't at all be surprised. You were coming in here with your "gifted" memory and incorrectly pointing out Luck had more turnovers (specifically picks) than touchdowns, when he didn't, because it helps make your guy look better.
Wilson plays on a team with more talent, a run game that's worth a damn, and one of the best defenses in the NFL and won just as many games as Luck last year. He also didn't win the Super Bowl. You're getting this giant boner over one playoff win that only happened because RG3's knee exploded. You're biased, won't admit it, and enjoy sucking Russell Wilson's . My work here is done.