Reply With Quote
1st - The Chicago Bulls beat the Utah Jazz 96-54 in Game 3 of the 1998 NBA Finals.
2nd - The Boston Celtics beat the Los Angeles Lakers 131-92 in Game 6 of the 2008 NBA Finals.
1st - The Chicago Bulls beat the Utah Jazz 96-54 in Game 3 of the 1998 NBA Finals.
2nd - The Boston Celtics beat the Los Angeles Lakers 131-92 in Game 6 of the 2008 NBA Finals.
game 2 is abit misleading when lebron padded stats in scrub minutes against the spurs bench to widen the margin...watta turd still cant even get to 20pts against the scrubs
Superfriends got taught a lesson the harsh way tbh. I still believe they (miami) can win this series because you can't Green and Neal to hit that many horse shots every game. their hands will cool down and the spurs will suffer. The series will last at least 6 games which's good news for fans anyway.
Neal? Maybe, although he's been pretty accurate from downtown all series.
Green? I wouldn't be so sure. He's been an elite shooter all year and been pretty hot these entire playoffs.
We are an elite shooting team and should not be considered flukish with our successful shots.
Loss should have been bigger. The refs did everything they could to keep the cHeat in it in the 1st half. Det 6-point halftime should have been at least 15+ tbh.
We will remember this lose in about 10 years.. Not because it was so big, But because the Heat still won the championship.
Yes. If TP is hobbled, the shots won't be as open. But Green draining 16/23 through 3 games is not a fluke, the dude is a deadeye shooter who's proving the only fluke was the WCF last year. Before and after that series he's been incredible from distance.
Yes. Was so angry at the half I almost destroyed my iPad. It was total bull and I expect it again in G4.
law of avgs fellas, saying lebron will score big is like if the spurs big 3 are going to show up
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
