if he was to be amnestied, would Holt have to cough up the full 3.9 or just the 1 mil guaranteed
Zbo & d12 disagree
matt boner is only in the league because popazit likes to be "cute"
I think I speak for everyone when I say that we can only hope Bonner stays as our first big off the bench & signs an extension.
LMAO for the gamers, if you wanna see just how unbelievably pathetic our bigs are without Duncan, play a few rounds on 2K without him. its like upping the difficulty level to super ultra utmost maximum.
It's not about finding a replacement for $4 mil...it's about clearing $2.5 mil more for a FA...if Pop and the FO are not going to play the FA game this year, then I would expect bonner to be here after next week.
Here is what the salary cap expert at hoopsworld(I know) said....(But it does make sense)
Larry, the Spurs have guaranteed salary at 32mil for next season. That leaves about 37mil to match this season salary (69mil) without paying tax. However the salary cap is at 58mil. What should their moves be chronologically to keep their payroll intact without being limited by the cap?
Larry Coon
They’re committed to $41.7 million, not $32 million. Diaw ($4.7 million) and Mills ($1.1 million) have player options, but I imagine both will opt in. Matt Bonner is guaranteed $1 million if he’s waived, so the Spurs COULD clear another $2.5 million by waiving him. Also, Neal & Splitter are restricted free agents. I’m sure they will keep Neal, so his $1.1 million qualifying offer will stay on their cap. Splitter ($4.9 million) I’m not so sure about. Finally, Blair, Manu & McGrady are unrestricted.
So the most they COULD get is if they waive Bonner & walk away from everyone else (assuming Diaw & Mills pick up their options) is about $18.4 million of cap room (this also assumes they keep their draft pick). Subtract $2.5 million from that total if they keep Bonner. Subtract $0.6 million if they keep Neal (and I’m sure his actual contract will be higher, so this only counts until he’s signed). Subtract $4.4 million if they keep Splitter.
And if they want to keep Manu (at a lower salary) they need to sign him first – otherwise his free agent amount will eat into their cap room. But once he’s signed, his actual contract will eat into their cap room.
So chronologically it’d be:
1. Decide what to do with Bonner before June 30.
2. Make a qualifying offer to Neal by June 30.
3. Renounce everyone they’re going to renounce when the moratorium ends.
4. If they’re going to keep Manu at a lower salary, sign him asap.
5. Go shopping for free agents.
6. Re-sign Neal when they’re done.
Agree completely. Ditch the red head
well they can either keep bonner for 3.9, waive him for 1, but if they're going to waive him they might as well use the amnesty provision so that 1 won't count against the cap
If the Spurs waive Bonner before June 30 to save money, can they sign him for a minimum deal when the FA period start?
Another option with Bonner would be to push back his guaranteed deadline by a couple of weeks and then amnesty him in July. If Spurs are serious about going after free agents with their cap space, that's the best solution.
Hopefully it's the end of his "legacy"
Why would they amnesty him?...then they would have to pay all of his $3+ mil contract as opposed to buying him out for $1 mil.
I hope we keep him. I was impressed with his effort in this playoff run, and he seems like a good person to have around the locker room.
We need warriors, not one-trick ponies.
So, tomorrow is the last day Spurs can waive Bonner. After that is $4M for a guy that barely play or amnesty
Bonnerwatch 2013 is in full swing. An already emotionally unstable fan base will have a handful of pills in one hand and a razor in the other if Bonner's contract becomes guaranteed. However, I see that as highly unlikely with RC already stating he wanted cap flexibility.
Would anyone really be suprised if Pop kept Bonner around?
Of course not
If Bonner gets cut...this will he Pop
Someone needs to keep seats warm, tbh...but then again, that's where Patty comes in. Oh well, it will hurt this kid's feelings:
![]()
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)