Nice bolding there, bro. As if I'm not painfully ing aware the Spurs are 0-4 in their search for a back to back. Ya .
The real question is, how many teams repeated that were more than flashes in the pan, compared to 15 years of dominance and 5 Finals appearances? Discounting the Mikan Lakers, I can think of Magic's Lakers, the Bill Russell Celtics, and the Jordan Bulls. And Jordan's bulls are actually an outlier, really. Bill Russell, too, if you wanna bring differences in eras into account.
The Bad Boy Pistons had a stretch of maybe 6-7 years they were solidly contenders, and rivals with the Bird Celtics, no less. Rockets? Cmon. They're not worth mentioning in an argument against the Spurs in terms of dynasties. Yeah, Hakeem took DRob to school 1 on 1, let's avoid the inevitable trashtalk that always results from this argument. Hakeem > DRob. But don't tell me MJ's shady retirement didn't have a direct effect on Hakeem winning those two les. ing Bird didn't even repeat, and he had a golden chance to in 87 after whooping Hakeem's ass in 86. Repeating is overrated. Wilt didn't repeat. Kareem didn't repeat til the twilight years of his career. Shaq needed one of, if not the most stacked team in NBA history to get his first repeat. Kobe had another stacked team in a year full of injuries. The Superfriends own another one of the most stacked teams in NBA history, which hurts the fact that they have been le contender on and off since 2005. The Bad Boy Pistons would never repeat in the 2000's era - they're the biggest influence on why the modern era exists, tbh.
The whole bullseye on the back thing is true, but the Spurs have had a bullseye on their back since 2004, I'd say.