Remember xmas1997 these are the boys you allign yourself. And me and you were having such a civilized conversation
Where did I lie? What part of"I just gave truth and truth is not bias." Contains the lie? Especially after Xmas agreed.
I'm a liar and butted my fat short bus nose in someone else's business pretending to have conversation, now I regret it.
.
So you're not gonna back up your claim?
When you said that the lying maalox was telling the truth -flat out lie.
No one ever ed with maalox - yet - like you - she launched her little war against us and it backfired - so now she wants to play the "xmas - do you think what sbm and sa210 are DOING is right?"
Just like you - if we never ed with you -
why in the in' world would you suddenly go and post against us?
Where did your bias come from if we never ed with you?
There is your truth.
We both know I'm full of , dammit
I never ed with you, my response was that Julius c Caesar was a senator and your boy xmas1997 agreed his reply was in error. and then you and your boy started attacking me, when you're first boy and I had no beef.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(now short bus angry ape boy will lie and say he never addressed/attacked us and was talking to xmas, it will be a failed attempt lol
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are mistaken if you think them my boys.
They are who they are, no more and no less.
I've had disagreements with both on numerous occasions.
But on the subject of Blake we seem to have found a consensus due to his history of self admitted trolling.
We are not aligned on all things, nor am I with most on this forum.
I have nothing against you or them.
But on their behalf they have never "trolled" me, unlike Blake.
If it were all in good fun as some like to say, or it's funn for him (Blake), then shouldn't it be funny to most?
Or just funny to him?
Hypocrisy abounds in his case and he gets no less, and more, then what he deserves IMHO.
He fails to understand this simple concept, and most other things too for that matter, and so he is attacked and made fun of for being the fool that he is.
Question: did you attack them (my boys, as you call them) first? If so, then you are getting what you deserve.
The written word can so easily be misunderstood and can have a myriad of meanings, an unintentional insult, or even the misunderstood written phrase, can lead to things like that.
Civility is cherished on the better forums IMHO.
You're not xmas1997 I wasn't speking to you so good call on predicting what I'd say cause you know its the truth. How could you even say that was an attack on you?^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You better tell them that because as posted by Chewbacca my response to you was an attack on themYou are mistaken if you think them my boys.
They are who they are, no more and no less.
I've had disagreements with both on numerous occasions.
But on the subject of Blake we seem to have found a consensus due to his history of self admitted trolling.
We are not aligned on all things, nor am I with most on this forum.
I have nothing against you or them.
But on their behalf they have never "trolled" me, unlike Blake.
If it were all in good fun as some like to say, or it's funn for him (Blake), then shouldn't it be funny to most?
Or just funny to him?
Hypocrisy abounds in his case and he gets no less, and more, then what he deserves IMHO.
He fails to understand this simple concept, and most other things too for that matter, and so he is attacked and made fun of for being the fool that he is.
The written word can so easily be misunderstood and can have a myriad of meanings, an unintentional insult, or even the misunderstood written phrase, can lead to things like that.
Civility is cherished on the better forums IMHO.
You can read this thread you tell me.. Question: did you attack them (my boys, as you call them) first? If so, then you are getting what you deserve.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^He is about to lie to you
My response was "you can read this thread you tell me"
Only a lie if he's illiterate
I ask you to put aside your views for a second and consider something.
Cannot the lumping of some together be considered an "off-handed insult, however mild, yet one just the same?
You have repeated using the terms "my boy" and "your boys" etc. and that reads as rather demeaning.
Are you one of "my boys"? Do you like being thought f that way?
I ask you to reconsider the possibility, in other words, put the shoe on the other foot, look at it from their and/or my perspective if you can, and you just might realize there was a "misunderstanding" here just as I thought you were talking about Blake and then about me.
Just a thought from one intelligent poster to another.
Sho how did I attack you again? Xmas1997 said you're not boys and I was replying to him.
I'm lumping you together because in my response to you they said I attacked them. Why wouldnt I assume you're boys in that caseI ask you to put aside your views for a second and consider something.
Cannot the lumping of some together be considered an "off-handed insult, however mild, yet one just the same?
You have repeated using the terms "my boy" and "your boys" etc. and that reads as rather demeaning.
Are you one of "my boys"? Do you like being thought f that way?
I ask you to reconsider the possibility, in other words, put the shoe on the other foot, look at it from their and/or my perspective if you can, and you just might realize there was a "misunderstanding" here just as I thought you were talking about Blake and then about me.
Just a thought from one intelligent poster to another.
What info did I omit?
How about in the future when you see the likes of maalox, chumpie,blake, et al -
being the trolls that they are -
and trying their best to with us -
you kindly stay the out of it instead of siding with the trolls.
This will be in your best interests.
Then we would have absolutely no reason to with you.
kapische?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
