Sigh, I just hope we have HCA in the first round.
Remaining schedules for seeds 2-6 in the West.
Rockets: 53-24
- @ Spurs
- Spurs
- Pelicans
- @ Hornets
- Jazz
Grizzlies: 52-25
- Pelicans
- @ Jazz
- @ Clippers
- @ Warriors
- Pacers
Blazers: 50-26
- @ Nets
- Timberwolves
- @ Warriors
- Jazz
- @ Thunder
- @ Mavs
Clippers: 52-26
- Lakers
- Grizzlies
- Nuggets
- @ Suns
Spurs: 51-26
- @ Thunder
- Rockets
- @ Rockets
- Suns
- @ Pelicans
Last edited by Cloud786; 04-06-2015 at 01:14 AM.
That Clippers schedule..ugh..2 seed wrapped up..
Here's my prediction of how things will go down and shape up at the end.
Rockets: 53-24
- @ Spurs L
- Spurs W
- Pelicans W
- @ Hornets W
- Jazz W
-- 57-25
Grizzlies: 52-25
- Pelicans W
- @ Jazz L
- @ Clippers L
- @ Warriors W (Warriors resting)
- Pacers W
-- 55-27
Blazers: 50-26
- @ Nets L
- Timberwolves W
- @ Warriors W (Warriors resting)
- Jazz W
- @ Thunder L
- @ Mavs L
-- 53-29
Clippers: 52-26
- Lakers W
- Grizzlies W
- Nuggets W
- @ Suns W
-- 56-26
Spurs: 51-26
- @ Thunder W
- Rockets W
- @ Rockets L
- Suns W
- @ Pelicans W
--55-27
In this scenario, the seeds would breakdown like this.
1). Warriors
2). Rockets: 57-25
3). Clippers: 56-26
4). Blazers: 53-29
5). Grizzlies: 55-27
6). Spurs: 55-27
7). Mavericks
8). Thunder
Grizzlies would have the tiebreaker over us as their division record would be 9-7 as opposed to our 8-8 (in this scenario).
In my opinion, the only way the Spurs have any chance of having homecourt is to run the table. That would put us at 56-26, making the Rockets 56-26 as well as the Clippers (assuming the rest of the above stays true). In this three way tie, since there are two divisions involved, I believe the tiebreaker that would invoked would be best record in all games among tied teams. Rockets and Clippers split 2-2. Spurs and Clippers split 2-2. Spurs would be up 3-1 on Rockets. I believe this would put us at 2nd seed, Clippers at 3rd seed (division winner), and Rockets at 5th seed. Of course, this is just one scenario. Grizzlies could just as easily end up with the same record too, which could change everything up. Just mind boggling how close the Western Conference is this year.
Last edited by Cloud786; 04-06-2015 at 01:53 AM.
In case anyone is wondering about how Rockets/Grizzlies/Clippers/Spurs have done against each other for tiebreaking purposes.
Rockets:
- Against Grizzles: 2-2
- Against Clippers: 2-2
- Against Spurs: 1-1 (2 games pending)
Grizzles:
- Against Rockets: 2-2
- Against Clippers: 2-1 (1 game pending)
- Against Spurs: 2-2
Clippers:
- Against Rockets: 2-2
- Against Grizzlies: 1-2 (1 game pending)
- Against Spurs: 2-2
Spurs:
- Against Rockets 1-1 (2 games pending)
- Against Grizzlies: 2-2
- Against Clipperes: 2-2
PS: We had a potential 5-team-tie in our league, which would have decided over relegation to the lower league (Europe).
Scenario: Teams A, B, C, D, E all end up with the same number of points (Wins respectively). Team D swept the season series against team E.
But team E would have ended infornt of them, because they got one more point in the 5-team-headtohead-comparison (A-B-C-E-D)
All of this was prevented by team A winning against another team in the last game, pulling out of the 5-team-tie, so the 4-team-tie ended B-C-D-E...
RS game. With Livingston suspended, they had to run out Barbosa and Holiday. GSWs defense is based more on length and versatility. The Spurs were able to play Mills or Cojo with the second unit without having to worry about Livingston (who is 6'7) posting up or challenging shots.
On the other end, Splitters absence was probably a plus with the added spacing of Bonner in the starting unit. Our defense wasn't that great at the rim on several occasions but we generally did a good job at closing out on shooters (specifically Green). The Warriors didn't play anywhere close to their best. Neither did the Spurs.
Don't Like Jimi Hendrix? Fuck You.
I'd expect Portland to beat OKC. They have been awful defensively (OKC has)
I could see the Spurs losing @ the Pelicans with the big 3 sitting and Kyle Anderson playing until he drops.
The Pelicans are making the postseason.
Pelicans
Warriors-L
Grizzlies-L
Suns -W
@ HOU -L
@ Min -W
SAS-W
44-38
OKC
SAS-L
@ IND-L
@ Kings-W
POR-L
@ MIN-W
44-38
Pelicans own the tie breaker. I could see them winning one of the GSW, Warriors, & Rockets other than that I agree with the projected W's & L's.
Don't Like Jimi Hendrix? Fuck You.
Originally Posted by Dan McCarney
Spurs have 5 games left to go 5-0 and secure homecourt, trickiest games are the next 2. We suck at OKC and then Houston will be well rested for the b2b.
The most important game right now for the Spurs is Memphis vs New Orleans.
Why? First of all because we'd obviously be tied with Memphis in the loss column, but also because they would have a worse divisional record than us (always assuming we win out, or everything is moot). And that'd mean we own the tiebreaker against them. In the event of a tie at the end of season we'd win our division and be seeded 2nd.
We should all root for the Pelicans come Wednesday!
"I am free of prejudice. I hate everyone equally." ~ W.C. Fields
Co-Pope of the CoT
Yep, that's a big game in terms of seeding. Here's some more:
Head to head tiebreakers:
SAS vs HOU - 1-1 (2 games remaining)
SAS vs MEM - 2-2 (tied)
SAS vs POR - 1-3 (POR won)
SAS vs LAC - 2-2 (tied)
HOU vs MEM - 2-2 (tied)
HOU vs POR - 1-2 (POR won)
HOU vs LAC - 2-2 (tied)
MEM vs POR - 4-0 (MEM won)
MEM vs LAC - 2-1 (1 game remaining)
LAC vs POR - 3-1 (LAC won)
Division Records:
SAS: 6-7
HOU: 7-6
MEM: 8-7
Conference Records:
SAS: 28-19
HOU: 31-17
MEM: 33-15
POR: 30-17
LAC: 33-15
So basically if the Spurs don't win both games against Houston, they pretty much lose every tiebreaker. If they split those games, they couldn't win the tiebreaker over Houston or Memphis, even if they won their last divisional game against New Orleans. That would put them at 8-8, which would be the worst Houston or Memphis could finish at that point and then we lose the all the Conference tiebreakers.
That's a pretty good characterization. It's also a very long season, so just happens sometimes. The Spurs have had third-quarter issues in past years, which made it seem familiar when they struggled with it recently. It also seemed like they would drop a game right after ESPN had three shows talking about their repeat chances.
Overall I agree with you: When they're focused and play their game, I don't think anyone can beat them in a series. It took Kyrie Irving hitting almost literally everything he put in the air to win that game in overtime. Doubtful anyone shoots that hot four out of seven.
its hard for me to see Memphis lose 2 games in a row at home.