Reply With Quote
But you too are posting in it, a lot. You got to be specific.
This thread and many of those posting in it.
But you too are posting in it, a lot. You got to be specific.
People other than myself.
That's not explaining. I want to see specifics cause I've been in this thread since the beginning and I don't know what you're talking about.
So you're saying the 14 year old girl was not a threat and we shouldn't fear her?
OK. I agree.
Cop did the right thing. Too bad his fellow officers didn't follow his lead.
So if you're not afraid of her she must not be a threat? Plus, you weren't talking about A 14 yr old girl, you were talking about being afraid of just "14 yr old girls."
So do you thing that specific 14 year old girl a threat to that police officer?
Yes or no.
Let's move this along please.
Obvious troll is obvious but with that said, you're right that he was more or less right, if not a little over the top.
I think you mean, "if a little over the top".
Poster 'KKK' is not a troll
It works either way because there's a school of thought that he wasn't over the top and was perfectly justified.
It still doesn't really work. And that's not how you meant it anyway.
Glad I finally got an actual conversation out of you. It took a while.
A threat to what? You don't just arrest people for being physical threats. Your question has been irrelevant since the very beginning
So you sit with a knee in the back of a 14 year old girl just for kicks?Glad I finally got an actual conversation out of you. It took a while.
A threat to what? You don't just arrest people for being physical threats. Your question has been irrelevant since the very beginning
lol that's even more pathetic
Was she resisting? Were there people at the scene trying to interfere with the arrest? We need specifics.
Do we?
Cop admitted he ed up and resigned. I agree with him when he says he ed up.
Sure, he admits he went overboard. And he may have been forced to resign. He definitely fears the backlash. I'm just wondering why you thought he was scared of a 14 yr old girl. You seem to be invested in talking about feelings.
I don't blame you. You're an idiot.
You just can't talk about ideas, just feelings.
The cop blamed his feelings for his actions.
Not ideas.
I don't blame you. You're an idiot.
Twisting an argument and repeating a pejorative is not talking about anything substantive.
Is it hard for you to not be an idiot, idiot?
Aw, you got so upset at the whip's being reversed that you missed the substance.
I don't blame you. You're an idiot.
An upset idiot.
Still fixated on feelings.
Still thinking strawmen are legit arguments.
Never change, Idiot.
I'm just saying what the cop said.
What idea do you say he blamed his actions on?
You don't even know what that means.Still thinking strawmen are legit arguments.
I will never move out of your head.Never change, Idiot.
The rent is free.
Did I say that the cop blamed ideas, or did I actually say that you can't argue ideas? You're proving your idiocy every post, Idiot.
I said the cop blamed his feelings.
So since you aren't arguing that, what are you arguing, idiot?
Do you even know anymore? Or have your FEELINGS gotten the better of you again?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions