Joe Rogan Thread

[TheSanityAnnex]

these posts are virtually meaningless, considering it's already been confirmed that you read all the ignore list messages anyway

Yeah he's slipped up a few times and outed himself. It must eat him up inside not being able to reply while pretending not to read them. Stupid got should just man up and take everyone off ignore. Although I do find it funny 3/4 of the page he's reading is filled with ignore messages. That must really up the message board reading experience.

And thats right Fuzzy I know you reading this stupid .

[vy65]

I can always tell when you give up when you do this. You were the one denigrating the school. Anyway this has now devolved enough. ciao troll squad.

The guy rolling with "she won an award in law school" is telling the practicing lawyer who's done.

I'm more than happy to explain how your other legal opinions are incorrect too

even wrong about who gave up

[vy65]

SocialJusticeWarrior
Listen and Believe.
This message is hidden because SocialJusticeWarrior is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list

[spurraider21]

It must eat him up inside not being able to reply while pretending not to read them.

[Th'Pusher]

So is there precedent for challenging evidence that's been disallowed under rape shield laws or not vy?

[vy65]

What do you mean by precedent? Have there been challenges to Rape Shield Laws? Is there a cons utional, or otherwise, basis for challenging those laws? Are there other bases for introducing evidence otherwise excluded by a RSL? You gotta clarify.

[Th'Pusher]

What do you mean by precedent? Have there been challenges to Rape Shield Laws? Is there a cons utional, or otherwise, basis for challenging those laws? Are there other bases for introducing evidence otherwise excluded by a RSL? You gotta clarify.

Yes, yes and yes.

[vy65]

Yes, yes and yes.

Why don't you look it up?

[Th'Pusher]

Why don't you look it up?

I did. I want to hear you answer the question since you've been whining about how unfair rape shield laws are for the last couple of days.

[spurraider21]

do rape shield laws also apply for men being raped by women? is the man's promiscuity admissible evidence?

[vy65]

I did. I want to hear you answer the question since you've been whining about how unfair rape shield laws are for the last couple of days.

Then by all means tell us.

[Th'Pusher]

Then by all means tell us.

I don't think I can be anymore clear. I want to hear you answer the question since you've been whining about how unfair rape shield laws are for the last couple of days.

[spurraider21]

I don't think I can be anymore clear. I want to hear you answer the question since you've been whining about how unfair rape shield laws are for the last couple of days.

he told you to look it up and you responded with "I did." So i think he (and the rest of us) want to hear your findings.

[vy65]

I don't think I can be anymore clear. I want to hear you answer the question since you've been whining about how unfair rape shield laws are for the last couple of days.

thinking I'd answer because that's what you want.

You did the research, tell us what you found.

[Th'Pusher]

he told you to look it up and you responded with "I did." So i think he (and the rest of us) want to hear your findings.

I don't give a what you want to hear. He knows the answer, but he's too much of a pussy to answer it. I'm fine with that.

[vy65]

asking you to tell us what you found = pussy?

[Th'Pusher]

asking you to tell us what you found = pussy?

You asked me to clarify what I meant by precedent. I did, then you told me to look it up. That's pussy.

[vy65]

Why won't you show us what you got slurper?

[vy65]

this is like the worst bait job ever

"I totally looked it up, I swear, but I need YOU to say it ..."

[vy65]

And me not wanting to do legal research at home when I've been at work for 11 hours = pussy.

[Th'Pusher]

Why did you ask me to clarify what I meant by precedent? Why not just tell me to look it up right off the bat? Did you think you might feel like it after your 11 hour day, then decide you were too tired?

[vy65]

This is re ed. Either show us what you got or shut up.

No one cares about the google search you may or may not have done.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You asked me to clarify what I meant by precedent. I did, then you told me to look it up. That's pussy.

http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.ed...ext=clevstlrev

This article is well annotated and thorough. It talks about major cases regarding rape shield laws in the SCOTUS and a half dozen state supreme courts. His response has been that the author is a law clerk that went to a bad school. He gives nothing of his own credentials of course.

He is not very brave. I give you that.

[Th'Pusher]

http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.ed...ext=clevstlrev

This article is well annotated and thorough. It talks about major cases regarding rape shield laws in the SCOTUS and a half dozen state supreme courts. His response has been that the author is a law clerk that went to a bad school. He gives nothing of his own credentials of course.

He is not very brave. I give you that.

I know what the answer is. He knows what the answer is, but he's too much of a pussy to answer it, because it flies in the face of what he's been whining about.

[vy65]

You do realize that a pussy wouldn't have asked you 5x to tell us what you researched, right?