Reply With Quote
When did I say you were his alt, Cleveland?
You too pussy? You think fuzzy and I are the same person?
When did I say you were his alt, Cleveland?
Provide me link to where I plagiarized or even referenced any article that won a Cleveland State law school award. I'll pay you $100 if you can.
I already did last night, Cleveland. I don't need your money.
Still waiting for the plan here, tbh.
No you didn't. Link that or shut the up you lying fake libertarian pussy.
Godord
xeer
ers' got no plan. He's not even smart enough to be considered an ideologue. Bordering on WC stupidity.
While we're all lining up for responses from CN that he earlier evaded, can I have a response to this one please
Doctors get paid quite a healthy salary to do their work and provide the abortions, so of course they should have to. You Libertarians though would force a women to keep a baby even if they can not pay for the baby's care, health insurance, education etc. And I'm guessing you wouldn't pay these struggling women even a dime to look after their child, despite the fact that it was YOU who forces them to keep the baby. After you make them keep the baby, they'll be forced to ask the government for money but you won't give them any because 'the government shouldn't interfere in healthcare'. This means the baby will likely die or be severely malnourished, and it'll be the the fat white Libertarian's sitting on their stacks of cash that'll blame the mother for the babies death, even though she didn't want the ing baby in the first place.
Libertarians, they'll make the government intervene when it suits them, but as soon as people need money due to the government's intervention they'll say' that, it's your problem now.'
Or that pussy Vy to answer this:
If a judge deems evidence inadmissible citing rape shield law, does the defense have any avenues to challenge the decision with relevant case law to cite as precedent?
These muther ers refuse to answer some questions...
The Supreme Court overturning their fundamentally sexist decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey would have to be the first step, as those legally shield the mother from the responsibility of even informing the father of their desire to have an abortion, let alone actually discussing it. Many pro-life groups have suggested requiring the father's consent before an abortion can be done, but this would probably be politically unpopular in the present climate. As a compromise, I think the idea of a "financial abortion" for fathers early on in pregnancy is a good one.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8147260No you didn't. Link that or shut the up you lying fake libertarian pussy.
Godord
xeer
interesting because none of the policy i've discussed has had to do with changing women's pregnancy rights.
So you do think I'm fuzzy? God bless you are a stupid man.
who is anti-choice in this matter outside of CN?You know the anti-choice crowd have lost the debate when they begin circling in on ChumpDumper's rhetoric in an endless battle of straw man accusations and empty insults. When it gets to that point, the thread's lost.
Give it up guys
and he's a ing moron to boot.
The reason men don't have the options women have is because they can't get pregnant.
that's just you trying to tell somebody else to conduct legal research for you
i never said men should have the same options women have.
i have SPECIFICALLY said several times that the choice of how to ultimately deal with a pregnancy (keep it or terminate) is solely up to the woman. what part of that aren't you getting?
Nowhere in that post did I accuse you of being Fuzzy, Cleveland. Who's stupid again?
Are you actually re ed enough to think that every libertarian is anti-life, or is this just another one of your lame schticks, Cleveland?
and he's a ing moron to boot.
off. Any lawyer with his salt could answer that question. Is there ANY avenue...
a ing humanities major can answer the question.
then it's amazing that you haven't been able to answer it yourself
Yet you yourself still haven't answered the question, despite claiming you had an answer to it, Cleveland. You pretend-Googled and tried to pass off skimming the thread and reading that bull article Fuzzy had already posted as "research."
You want men to be able to opt out of any responsibility. Women can only do that because they are the ones that get pregnant.
there are plausible ways for a man to opt out of responsibility without encroaching on the woman's rights to her body. none that are legally recognizable as of now. that is the issue i have.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
