Reply With Quote
What schtick, David? I'm stating a fact.
We know you just follow others and steal their shticks, David.
What schtick, David? I'm stating a fact.
Every shtick you have ever used, David. I'm stating a fact.
Seems like a weird time to bring up schticks when I'm pointing out the reality of your disgusting vagina, David.
I brought up the vagina shtick, David. You followed me.
As always.
Are you so angry because you know everyone else is better at this than you?
I just figured as long as people were talking about vaginas, it'd be pertinent to bring up how used-up and gross yours is, David.
Speaking of schticks, your thread-derailing 500 Questions schtick is the oldest and most tired one in Internet history.
It's the mother's body. So if the father says no to them they should just go along with it?
Eh, you're just angry for whatever reason and try to be a tough guy online.
You use that shtick too.Speaking of schticks, your thread-derailing 500 Questions schtick is the oldest and most tired one in Internet history.
You're welcome.
Double cuck standards, the man has no power per par. Male feminist smh
You know you could say the woman knew the risks also but you're a hypocrite
It's the father's sperm that collided with the egg to begin with. So they shouldn't have any say in whether their kid lives or dies?
It's the mother's damn fetus and it's the mother who has to deal with childbirth. Nobody said the men don't get any say, but if the mother is adamant they don't want the baby, they should be allowed to abort it and not feel pressured into keeping it.
ok
So what say do they get then?
It's the mother and father's fetus.
In the US, the Supreme Court did. The father doesn't even have to be told in advance.Nobody said the men don't get any say
Why do you hate men so much?
Ideally, for you though abortion would be outlawed so NEITHER the mother or father would get a say.
Why do you hate people's free will so much?
Why do you hate freedom?
This is so beyond stupid that I figure you have to be trolling at this point, but I'll play along.
What does "having a say" entail? What if they just disagree altogether? Flip a coin?
If a father's non-consent to abortion prevents the woman from having an abortion, that's not "having a say." That's not equal.
About as much say as das Deutsche Volk had over the Russian infiltration of Berlin after Hitler cucked himself, I'm guessing is the answer you're looking for.
Yeah didn't think you had a logical response
Ok then, let's hear your thoughts then Einstein.
You made the assertion that men have a say then immediately contradicted yourself, I just asked you how you arrived at that conclusion. The woman has all the power, not sure where you figure men get a say.
But a woman not even having to tell the father about the abortion is equal?
so whats your scenario where both parties have an equal say. how would it play out?
The men aren't gagged at the mouth, they can talk to their partner, give advice, recommend what to do next BUT they can't force a woman to keep a child. So if it comes down to a final say, surely the mother should make the final decision, being it is them harbouring the child?
What would your alternative be?
Equal to what?
Why, and how, would the law regulate something like that, Libertarian? How would they even enforce it? Do you believe the government should require a signed permission slip from the biological father before a woman can get an abortion? What if she doesn't know how to contact him?
Please outline how you believe this can be realistically enforced by the state.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
