Bernie sanders just torpedoed his own campaign

[playjimmer]

How is mass killing, one of the largest if not the largest form of murder 'narrow'? Surely this is as broad as it gets when it comes to murder on a national level. I'd get chastised if I brought up statistics on a local level, or just on the street. So I went as broad as I could, which is more than CN could do...

because mass murders are a very small % of murders and it completely excludes gang crime which has a lot of murders by illegal weapons.

[Clipper Nation]

1.) What evidence from your sources do you have to disprove this?

You made the claim to begin with, the burden of proof is on you.

2.) I've proven that mass murder

So, not all firearm homicides.

Again, you've got nothing, Sonmore.

[Blizzardwizard]

You made the claim to begin with, the burden of proof is on you.


So, not all firearm homicides.

Again, you've got nothing, Sonmore.

You were the one firing endless articles at me supposedly providing 'proof' not me, seems like you are the one with the burden of proof.

I linked legally obtained weapons to murder specifically, where have you done this at all?

You're wriggling, Cuck.

[Clipper Nation]

How is mass killing, one of the largest if not the largest form of murder 'narrow'?

It's not even close to "the largest form of murder." It's a tiny fraction of a percent of all murders.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...ion-of-murders

You're using a microscopic sample size to "prove" that the majority of all gun homicides are committed with legal firearms.

[Blizzardwizard]

because mass murders are a very small % of murders and it completely excludes gang crime which has a lot of murders by illegal weapons.

Well until you can find me statistics that cover all murders that mention numbers and how each and every weapon was obtained, legally or illegally, it's the best I'm going to find. Again, you all seem willing to poke at my figures, yet no figures at all have been provided as a counter..

[Clipper Nation]

Well until you can find me statistics that cover all murders that mention numbers and how each and every weapon was obtained, legally or illegally, it's the best I'm going to find.

Thanks for finally admitting you've got nothing.

[Blizzardwizard]

It's not even close to "the largest form of murder." It's a tiny fraction of a percent of all murders.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...ion-of-murders

You're using a microscopic sample size to "prove" that the majority of all gun homicides are committed with legal firearms.

Again you're wriggling. First you said I had no evidence to link a larger amount of murders are committed with legally acquired weapons. I proceed to present evidence, now you're moving onto this 'all gun homicides vs mass murders' thing. Didn't you accuse me of separating and splitting into categories earlier, and now you're doing the same?

Try again, Cuck.

[Blizzardwizard]

Thanks for finally admitting you've got nothing.

Please quote me saying I have nothing. Oh wait.

I have far more than you, Cuck.

[Clipper Nation]

Again you're wriggling. First you said I had no evidence to link a larger amount of murders are committed with legally acquired weapons. I proceed to present evidence, now you're moving onto this 'all gun homicides vs mass murders' thing. Didn't you accuse me of separating and splitting into categories earlier, and now you're doing the same?

Try again, Cuck.

I'm not "wriggling" at all. You can keep accusing me of this every time you prove your stupidity, but it doesn't change the fact that you don't know what you're talking about.

Your original claim:

I imagine the total for murders from guns bought legally from stores would be considerably higher.

Not "mass murders," all murders.

Your goalpost move:

I've proven that mass murder is committed far more with legally obtained weapons than illegally

You're extrapolating from a tiny sample size and claiming victory. You're the one who's flip-flopping and wriggling, not me, and you've still got nothing, Sonmore.

[Blizzardwizard]

For the final time, cuck, where is the evidence to disprove me? You have provided nothing but bull uber-qualitative data with no facts or numbers at all. I have provided facts linking murder to legally obtained weapons being far greater than illegaly obtained weapons, and somehow you're attempting to claim victory?

You have nothing, cuck. It's over.

[Clipper Nation]

For the final time, cuck, where is the evidence to disprove me?

Where is your evidence to prove your claim beyond extrapolating from a tenth of a percent of all murders, Sonmore? You can't counter the fact that you've got nothing, so cut it short and end it there.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Ah, old man! Turned up a bit late to defend Cuck Nation huh?

What does that have anything to do with how weapons were obtained, legally or illegally?

like I said earlier your stupidity is entertaining. Please do the simple math I proposed and see if you can figure out where you've gone horribly wrong

[TheSanityAnnex]

For the final time, cuck, where is the evidence to disprove me? You have provided nothing but bull uber-qualitative data with no facts or numbers at all. I have provided facts linking murder to legally obtained weapons being far greater than illegaly obtained weapons, and somehow you're attempting to claim victory?

You have nothing, cuck. It's over.

not even close you stupid

[Blizzardwizard]

Where is your evidence to prove your claim beyond extrapolating from a tenth of a percent of all murders, Sonmore? You can't counter the fact that you've got nothing, so cut it short and end it there.

That evidence I provided, with 3/4 of mass murders being with legally obtained weapons, based on the last 30 years, will actually grow and grow, meaning that in the next 100 years, mass murders committed will likely be 99% to 1% with legally obtained weapons, supporting me further.

You ask for my evidence that I have already provided. I ask where is yours? You have nothing at all to link to murders you say? Ok.

You keep coming back with the exact same response in all your posts now cuck, so I think you should just end it now.

I start work soon, and as much as I'd like to keep giving you the run around, I'm going to end it here to spare your blushes further, cuck.

[Blizzardwizard]

not even close you stupid

Turning up late as usual old man., I'm just about to leave too, should've joined us earlier man, oh wait, I forgot that you never turn up unless you're with your buddies!

Please tell me what evidence has been provided to disprove me?

None you say?

Ok.

Have fun, old man.

[Clipper Nation]

That evidence I provided, with 3/4 of mass murders being with legally obtained weapons, based on the last 30 years, will actually grow and grow, meaning that in the next 100 years, mass murders committed will likely be 99% to 1% with legally obtained weapons, supporting me further.

Proof?

I start work soon

Lining up for your welfare check doesn't count as "work."

[playjimmer]

Again you're wriggling. First you said I had no evidence to link a larger amount of murders are committed with legally acquired weapons. I proceed to present evidence, now you're moving onto this 'all gun homicides vs mass murders' thing. Didn't you accuse me of separating and splitting into categories earlier, and now you're doing the same?

Try again, Cuck.

it was always all gun homicides.

[thunder]

Holy are UK people this ing re ed?

[m>s]

Holy are UK people this ing re ed?

Yes, you should see them on 4chan.. Total cucks and passive aggressive weaklings.

[Slutter McGee]

That evidence I provided, with 3/4 of mass murders being with legally obtained weapons, based on the last 30 years, will actually grow and grow, meaning that in the next 100 years, mass murders committed will likely be 99% to 1% with legally obtained weapons, supporting me further.

You ask for my evidence that I have already provided. I ask where is yours? You have nothing at all to link to murders you say? Ok.

Do they not require basic statistics in the UK, or are you just an idiot. That is not how sample sizes work. As additional mass murders happen over the years and we have more stats on the subject then we will be able to extrapolate more conclusions on mass murder...not all gun crime. That is unless it increases to a statistically significant number as an overall percentage of all murders over the years...which isn't going to happen.

[Splits]

You got "states can keep a well armed militia means every individual citizen should be armed to the teeth" people are parsing illegal and legal gun fatalities when there are 90 deaths and 230 injured per DAY by guns in this stupid ing country.

[m>s]

you could always move to the United cuckdom where you're not allowed to defend your daughters from paki rape gangs

[Spurminator]

http://www.clickhole.com/blogpost/it...ource=facebook

It’s Our Duty To Support The Troops And The Second Amendment In Case We Ever Need To Kill Them All

Russell Mandel

Blogger

These days, America faces its most troubling threats, both from the outside and the inside. Between terrorist groups like ISIS vowing daily to attack our citizens and our own government seemingly bent on infringing on our civil liberties, the American way of life as we know it is in constant danger.

That’s why I believe that, regardless of politics, it’s everyone’s duty to support the troops, and also to support the Second Amendment should the day come when we need to overthrow the government and kill those troops.

At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter what your stance on military action is. You need to remember that our soldiers don’t set foreign policy—they just follow the president’s orders. It’s crucial that you put aside your personal opinions, honor the brave men and women in uniform for their service, and also be ready to exercise your Second Amendment rights to shoot these heroic soldiers if it comes right down to it. Whether or not you support war, every soldier is a hero and a potential threat if the White House ever decides to come for our guns.

The troops volunteered to protect our freedom, and for that they deserve our respect. Every day, they put their lives on the line to preserve your right to acquire a basement full of powerful weapons to use on them should worst come to worst. Do I approve of everything the military does? No, of course not. Will I lurk in the woods, ambushing patrols of soldiers if necessary? Of course I will. But even if I take up arms against the troops, I will stand behind them.

Leave our soldiers out of your partisan bickering. If critics aren’t brave enough to wear the uniform themselves, then they should shut up and salute the troops, and also collect guns in case the need comes to kill them. But they should never forget their sacrifice.

There’s an old saying that the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of patriots and tyrants. Our nation’s men and women in the armed forces are the patriots. But, I guess, it’s also possible they could one day be the tyrants. So, let us pray for their safety, unless we’re the ones battling them, which is a distinct possibility. Let us all stand indivisible behind the American flag, unless we stop agreeing with what that flag stands for, in which case we should burn it.

It’s what the Founding Fathers would have wanted.

[boutons_deux]

http://www.clickhole.com/blogpost/it...ource=facebook

It’s Our Duty To Support The Troops And The Second Amendment In Case We Ever Need To Kill Them All

Russell Mandel

Blogger

These days, America faces its most troubling threats, both from the outside and the inside. Between terrorist groups like ISIS vowing daily to attack our citizens and our own government seemingly bent on infringing on our civil liberties, the American way of life as we know it is in constant danger.

That’s why I believe that, regardless of politics, it’s everyone’s duty to support the troops, and also to support the Second Amendment should the day come when we need to overthrow the government and kill those troops.

At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter what your stance on military action is. You need to remember that our soldiers don’t set foreign policy—they just follow the president’s orders. It’s crucial that you put aside your personal opinions, honor the brave men and women in uniform for their service, and also be ready to exercise your Second Amendment rights to shoot these heroic soldiers if it comes right down to it. Whether or not you support war, every soldier is a hero and a potential threat if the White House ever decides to come for our guns.

The troops volunteered to protect our freedom, and for that they deserve our respect. Every day, they put their lives on the line to preserve your right to acquire a basement full of powerful weapons to use on them should worst come to worst. Do I approve of everything the military does? No, of course not. Will I lurk in the woods, ambushing patrols of soldiers if necessary? Of course I will. But even if I take up arms against the troops, I will stand behind them.

Leave our soldiers out of your partisan bickering. If critics aren’t brave enough to wear the uniform themselves, then they should shut up and salute the troops, and also collect guns in case the need comes to kill them. But they should never forget their sacrifice.

There’s an old saying that the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of patriots and tyrants. Our nation’s men and women in the armed forces are the patriots. But, I guess, it’s also possible they could one day be the tyrants. So, let us pray for their safety, unless we’re the ones battling them, which is a distinct possibility. Let us all stand indivisible behind the American flag, unless we stop agreeing with what that flag stands for, in which case we should burn it.

It’s what the Founding Fathers would have wanted.

pure, absolute bull .

[Splits]

please tell me that's parody