Reply With Quote
Is this an attempt at ty Eurotrolling or are you really this stupid?
Just to remind you how you started this
Please post a point-by-point rebuttal to the article describing your issues with the points he is making.
Is this an attempt at ty Eurotrolling or are you really this stupid?
Just to remind you how you started this
What is it with you joining in late?
I know you need your sleep but maybe you should invest in an alarm clock, old man.
I don't sit around on Spurstalk all day and night hitting the refresh button hoping you've responded you nitwit. Are you going to address how this started or continue to ignore your original claim and try to use stats from the smallest % of gun murders (mass shootings)?
Are you going to provide any evidence do disprove my claims that I have backed up with evidence, unlike Cuck Nation.
It's over, old man.
Your claim was this
You didn't provide a shred of evidence for this claim. total for murders from guns =/= mass gun murders, how many times must this be explained to you.
Lmao United cuckdom is still in here shilling and cuckposting about guns
Obama has passed about zero gun control legislation in 8 years, and never made it into much of an issue during either campaign.
That didn't stop the NRA from whipping up enough lies to create a "they're comin' to git our guns" frenzy among the easily manipulated useful idiots.
No matter who the Democratic nominee is, that nominee will be painted as anti-gun, either truthfully, or through highly cynical and self-serving lies from the NRA.
All in all, that doesn't seem to me to be a deal breaker, because that has been the narrative for the last 50+ years.
No Obama tried really hard to and got btfo
Your evidence doesn't back your claim which was the total for murders from guns bought legally from stores would be considerably higher. The fact that more guns acquired legally were used in mass shootings than acquired illegally does nothing to support the claim of total gun murders. If you don't mind me asking how old are you? I feel like I'm arguing with a 15 year old.
the proportion of gun murders that involve legal guns versus illegal guns is not really a statistic that appears readily available.
Good data on types of guns used in murders, if not the legality:
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/GUIC.PDF
Above report does note the number of total guns in the US, versus the number reported stolen. Given the proportion, one would expect, all things being equal, that most gun violence would have to be performed by legally acquired guns. All things are not equal though, so it is hard to say one way or the other.
Here is a fairly balanced treatment of the issue, and it points to the difficulty as well:
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/12/gun...-vs-gun-facts/
FWIW.
Disagreed. Although he didn't pass much he did try. Funny how it backfired and Americans purchased more guns under his presidency than any other.
I can't help but think about most of what we know about how humans view others, i.e. through the prism of their own selves.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projectionPsychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against unpleasant impulses by denying their existence in themselves, while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude
A few competing theories, and some fairly good research points in this direction. Just sayin'.
"he did try".
Specifically what, other than a half-hearted attempt to limit large magazines?
Name as many examples as you can.
(edit) Remember it has been almost seven years, and if you want to link any given bill to the president, be sure to show Obama pushing the law.
If you can't name any that would fit that bill, why do you think that is? (hint: see "useful idiot" comment above)
Nice try sigmund
Just sayin'. (shrugs) I can't know the truth of it, only you do.
You are also welcome to post the bills that big bad Obama wanted to pass to take away guns, by the way.
I really can't think of any, other than a common sense limit on the size of magazines that got shot down by the wild-eyed crazies at the NRA, after the Sandy Hook shooting.
I wonder just how many children we need to sacrifice at the altar of gun-fetishism before we come to our senses.
It's only common sense to those who want the patriots limited when the civil war starts..I hate that "common sense" Orwellian language. And yes he did push for that bill.
Never. Won't happen, some of these guys would literally camp at their door with their MK22s if they knew somebody was coming to take their guns.
Dey took er gunnsssss!
Btw you talk about innocent kids but you say that you want me dead because you know that I won't turn them in
Here is a few from 2013
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/def..._time_full.pdf
And if you think his only push for gun control came as a half-hearted attempt to limit large magazines I don't think Obama would think of his push for gun control as his biggest failure.
"One of President Barack Obama's greatest frustrations is his inability to pass stricter gun laws, he told the BBC Thursday just hours before a mass shooting in a Louisiana theater. "If you ask me where is the one area where I feel that I have been most frustrated and most stymied, it is the fact that the United States of America is the one advanced nation on earth in which we do not have sufficient, common sense, gun safety laws," Obama said. "Even in the face of repeated mass killings."
an MK22?Never. Won't happen, some of these guys would literally camp at their door with their MK22s if they knew somebody was coming to take their guns.
Dey took er gunnsssss!you are so ing stupid. You might as well have said they were camping by their door with a pellet gun.
I'm sorry I don't fellate my guns in a rocking chair at night like you do. Do you practice by aiming at passersby, and do you shoot them if said passerby is wearing a Feel The Burn T-shirt?an MK22?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions