Reply With Quote
According to mainstream media, polls and "experts" last month. Trump should be 6 foot underground today.
Well . What happened?
Polls have Trump losing the both Hillary and Bernie.
According to mainstream media, polls and "experts" last month. Trump should be 6 foot underground today.
Well . What happened?
Trump would lose to just about any of the other Republican one on one as well.
Notice he's isn't deny it. I'm just calling u out so others know about you and don't get mislead by a shill.
Shillary now has a higher unfavorability rating than favorability among white women according to NBC polling.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/wary-vot...test-headlines
Doesn't represent ALL women, but that should be her bread-and-butter demographic and they hate her.
this this this
Lol
hate?so they will vote for any Repug where each is a proven, do ented misogynist?
Shillary is done
Does Hillary Have a Women Problem?
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...n-problem.html
Democrats like to argue that demographics are destiny. If so, they’re headed for disaster, as long as Hillary Clinton remains the front-runner for the nomination. A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows her favorability ratings shrinking, most significantly among two demographics considered key to Democratic turnout. The WSJ report focuses on one particular subgroup:
Many Democrats have long hoped that Hillary Clinton might expand Barack Obama‘s electoral coalition by drawing in more white women voters.
A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll suggests she may have a tough time pulling it off. Mrs. Clinton is losing ground with white women and many other important slices of the electorate, the poll shows, amid a spate of reports about her email practices, speaking fees and foreigndonations to the Clinton Foundation.
In June, 44% of white women had a favorable view of Mrs. Clinton, compared to 43% who didn’t. In July, those numbers moved in the wrong direction for Mrs. Clinton: Only 34% of white women saw her in a positive light, compared to 53% who had a negative impression of her, the poll found.
That’s a problem, but one that Democrats have had in the past, too. As Peter Nicholas points out, Mitt Romney won that subgroup by 14 points in 2012. The scope of the problem is what should worry Democrats, especially since one of the main premises of the Hillary Clinton campaign is the opportunity for women to make history by electing the first woman President. Either that message isn’t as compelling as Democrats thought, or Hillary herself isn’t.
That’s not the big story, though — this graph is:
Look at the slide in these key demos within the Democratic coalition. In just one month, Hillary has lost nearly 10 points among all women, and is now underwater. Her negatives have jumped significantly among independents to a majority (27/52), and close to a plurality among younger voters. In all three cases, the number of neutrals declined at the same time, which means less opportunity to correct the trend. Even among black voters, a cons uency that Democrats must have both engaged and enthusiastic in order to win, a significant drop in favorability has taken place. She went from 81/3 to 66/15 in thirty days.
It’s not just the suburban-mom vote. It’s across the board in almost every demo that matters. And this collapse is happening fast, suggesting once again that the more people see Hillary Clinton, the less they like her.
Nichols offers Democrats one lifeline at the end:
If Mrs. Clinton wants some comfort in the latest poll numbers, she can look to history. Back in 1992, a Democratic candidate named Bill Clinton also grappled with a poor negative image. In the summer before the presidential election that year, only 30% had a positive view of Mr. Clinton; 38% saw him in a negative light.
He went on to become the nation’s 42nd president.
Yeah, but. In 1992, people hardly knew Bill Clinton, and the exposure of his infidelity did some damage. At 30/38, though, Bill had plenty of upside left and a lot of political talent with which to woo the neutrals and the soft opposition, and his peccadilloes were seen as personal. Hillary Clinton has had 23 years in the spotlight since that time, and the scandals in which she’s mired are related to public corruption, not private relationships. Even if there were people who don’t know Hillary well enough to be persuaded, she clearly lacks the natural political talent that Bill has, or her favorables wouldn’t be collapsing, especially among otherwise loyal Democratic cons uencies.
Literally every woman I've spoken to about this, at least a couple dozen, ALL hate Hillary
Nothing you say changes the numbers.
They hate Trump more.
your sources and numbers suck
Trump will be phenomenal to the women, David. He can beat Shillary.
Painting Trump as a woman hater is pretty ing stupid.
the man has had what? 4 wives? he can't get enough of them
"There's nothing I love more than women, but they're really a lot different than portrayed. They are far worse than men, far more aggressive, and boy, can they be smart. Let's give credit where credit is due, and let's salute women for their tremendous power, which most men are afraid to admit they have." ("Trump: The Art of the Comeback")
"But, but, Trump hates women!"
The Donald is done: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._donald_peaked
Donald Trump remains the leader in the race for the Republican presidential nomination, but his support has fallen by a third over the past week-and-a-half. Carly Fiorina is now near the front of the pack.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds Trump with 17% support among Likely Republican Primary Voters, down from 26% in late July before the first GOP debate.
...
In late July, Trump earned 30% of the male vote and had 22% support among women. He now earns 19% and 14% support from these two groups.
After the 2010 midterm elections, Silver concluded that Rasmussen's polls were the least accurate of the major pollsters in 2010, having an average error of 5.8 points and a pro-Republican bias of 3.9 points according to Silver's model.
Polls such as Rasmussen Reports’ that take methodological shortcuts reach only a tiny fraction of the voter population, resulting in poor raw data.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/why-did-a-rasmussen-reports-poll-disappear/
You can't refute them, no matter how many YouTubes you post.
Fake and gay, stop shillposting. The women love Donald.
He said be fantastic to them if elected. Good enough for me.
Nope, it's a real, asexual poll. You failed to refute it.
I think trump might have peaked but if people like his policies he will get back to those levels or fall off
he is a very interesting candidate
they will not be 17 in awhile then he might even get past his highest number then if people like his views and policies
they are short of a ? now. Pretty smart how he is playing that do not let people have to much info tell you start dropping
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
