Unlike after 1 we let 'em up easy after 2. Didn't take a rocket scientist to see if we'd a done that after 1 there'd a been no 2.
Obviously it's a pretty subjective thing, but I say mostly economic strength combined with general influence in world.
Unlike after 1 we let 'em up easy after 2. Didn't take a rocket scientist to see if we'd a done that after 1 there'd a been no 2.
The kid looks a bit like Paul Westphal at yout.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06...oreign-powers/
this will explain things a little better. Germany is not a free country. The U.S. Controls their media until 2099 and they are still under military occupation.
This is also a great read
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-183232
They shouldn't charge her with anything. She's not the one who made the decision to kill him. The fact that she's being charged speaks to our police state culture.
...Teddy DuChamps father wouldn't be up in Togus, crazy as a house rat.
?
You dont know jack about the judicial system, do you?
Should we not charge people with accesory to murder now as well?
In fact, let's look the other way when I put a hit on you and pay someone to kill your entire family. It's ok since I only half participated in the scheme to murder your family.
Some people man..
Hey, I don't tell patrons to drink and drive yet I can still be held responsible.
She did the world a favor. She should get a ing medal.
She was dead wrong. Words CAN kill.
A white women killing a white man. Now that's something you don't see everyday. Usually it's the other way around.
Because you're providing a physical mind altering substance; and even then, your liability is significantly less.
Go back X years (not that many); and you won't find cases like this; people being charged for murder for someone else's suicide. Just saying that aloud sounds silly when you think of it. People once believed that personal responsibility was paramount. This is just passing the buck; and it's all part of an over arching effort to oppress us.
This person wasn't an accessory in a murder. She gave direction; and he made a choice as to whether to accept it or not.
kind of tend to agree, still wouldn't care if she died in a fire though
copypasta to defend hitler's pussy actions
inb4 shutup !
s always try to discredit the source rather than the information presented. If you aren't a then they taught you well, best goy.
I can certainly see why someone would think the worst of her. But I guarantee plenty of people let his kid down. Likely, his parents were total schmucks. And ultimately, he committed the murder; better that he killed himself than someone else at least.
information presented from a discredited source isn't reliable
That's just one gots opinion
Yeah wh it's just a sad story all the way around, he's weak and dumb but she's the most malicious character in this story by far. Our society has gotten very weak and degenerate. It's entertainment to do this type of stuff and millions of people are "depressed" and do this type of stuff. I don't really know what to say, the s got us good
Bullying someone into suicide has been prosecuted if I am not mistaken.
Eh, he was getting cold feet but she pushed him pretty hard to do it. Also assisted with knowledge on how to do it.
She needs to be charged with something.
Agreed.
She's culpable of more than being a .
If if you don't get her now they'll get her later-albeit she'll have killed somebody herself that time.
Psychos will fo psycho things.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)