Reply With Quote
How many Syrian families have been housed by spurstalk posters?
I said "if".
How many Syrian families have been housed by spurstalk posters?
Roughly as many as adopted babies who would have been otherwise aborted.
I never knew that Syrian families were blacker than my
Meh. Hundreds of millions of people are awfully hard to kill with once a year mass shootings.
I can see why you are scared.
People's impulse to help and actual moral actions, might show how morally bankrupt right-wing nationalists really are.
Humans evolved as a social species, and that has consequences. Go against the moral impulse to help, and you make it a lot easier to marginalize such views, rightfully so. You are your own worst enemy, which is an irony you may never fully grasp.
psychological effects, economic turmoils as well as personal freedoms are hugely affected by even 1 terrorist attack.
Meh. Hundreds of millions of people are awfully hard to kill with once a year mass shootings.
just look as US pre- and post- 911. totally different countries
I don't want them in the US. Islam destroys everything it touches. As much as I'm not a fan of Christianity, Islam is so much worse.
I can see why you are scared.
People's impulse to help and actual moral actions, might show how morally bankrupt right-wing nationalists really are.
Humans evolved as a social species, and that has consequences. Go against the moral impulse to help, and you make it a lot easier to marginalize such views, rightfully so. You are your own worst enemy, which is an irony you may never fully grasp.
The Gulf States could easily accept up to three million refugees from Syria, but the problem is that they seem to prefer funding armed groups, including those in Syria, rather than assist people feeling the war, says Ali Al-Ahmed, Director of the Ins ute for Gulf Affairs.
Political analyst Daniel Patrick Welch on military action in Syria that some leaders still push for: “It is clear that [Western military actions] are creating these refugees. All of these wars of conquest and of choice against Libya, against Yemen, against Syria, against Iraq, against Afghanistan have all destabilized the region. And these are all the ones that Europe has happily participated in. And European populations also have happily gone along with the first invasion of Iraq in the beginning. Everything else has been a cakewalk.”
it's europe's up. let them deal with it
As of today, the UK is 94% empty. We have 1m empty properties. We can house 800k refugees at the drop of a hat. All we need is the will.
send them to those ty british isles. IMO. They'll love the food and weather
are dubya, head, rummy, condi, feith, wolfie, the execs of BigOil and BigMIC housing the refugees they created? or are they blocking the USA from taking those refugees?
Yeah I'm sorry I don't want my entire iden y destroyed and shariah imposed. I like my iden y and if you truly appreciated diversity then you wouldn't want to destroy races and cultures. You're a hypocrite and a liar.
I can see why you are scared.
People's impulse to help and actual moral actions, might show how morally bankrupt right-wing nationalists really are.
Humans evolved as a social species, and that has consequences. Go against the moral impulse to help, and you make it a lot easier to marginalize such views, rightfully so. You are your own worst enemy, which is an irony you may never fully grasp.
It's funny how you talk about evolution and you want to bring in less evolved people into our society? That helps us how? Look if you want to house Syrians in your cuck shed then that's fine but first of all these aren't even most Syrians wring the war and B off Germany. Nationalism is ing beautiful. Sieg Heil.
How Neocons Destabilized Europe
The neocon prescription of endless “regime change” is spreading chaos across the Middle East and now into Europe, yet the neocons still control the mainstream U.S. narrative and thus have diagnosed the problem as not enough “regime change,” as Robert Parry reports.
The refugee chaos that is now pushing deep into Europe – dramatized by gut-wrenching photos of Syrian toddler Aylan Kurdi whose body washed up on a beach in Turkey – started with the cavalier ambitions of American neocons and their liberal-interventionist sidekicks who planned to remake the Middle East and other parts of the world through “regime change.”
Instead of the promised wonders of “democracy promotion” and “human rights,” what these “anti-realists” have accomplished is to spread death, destruction and destabilization across the Middle East and parts of Africa and now into Ukraine and the heart of Europe. Yet, since these neocon forces still control the Official Narrative, their explanations get top billing – such as that there hasn’t been enough “regime change.”
For instance, The Washington Post’s neocon editorial page editor Fred Hiatt on Mondayblamed “realists” for the cascading catastrophes. Hiatt castigated them and President Barack Obama for not intervening more aggressively in Syria to depose President Bashar al-Assad, a longtime neocon target for “regime change.”
But the truth is that this accelerating spread of human suffering can be traced back directly to the unchecked influence of the neocons and their liberal fellow-travelers who have resisted political compromise and, in the case of Syria, blocked any realistic efforts to work out a power-sharing agreement between Assad and his political opponents, those who are not terrorists.
In early 2014, the neocons and liberal hawks sabotaged Syrian peace talks in Geneva by blocking Iran’s participation and turning the peace conference into a one-sided shouting match where U.S.-funded opposition leaders yelled at Assad’s representatives who then went home. All the while, the Post’s editors and their friends kept egging Obama to start bombing Assad’s forces.
The madness of this neocon approach grew more obvious in the summer of 2014 when the Islamic State, an Al Qaeda spinoff which had been slaughtering suspected pro-government people in Syria, expanded its bloody campaign of beheadings back into Iraq where this hyper-brutal movement first emerged as “Al Qaeda in Iraq” in response to the 2003 U.S. invasion.
It should have been clear by mid-2014 that if the neocons had gotten their way and Obama had conducted a massive U.S. bombing campaign to devastate Assad’s military, the black flag of Sunni terrorism might well be flying above the Syrian capital of Damascus while its streets would run red with blood.
But now a year later, the likes of Hiatt still have not absorbed that lesson — and the spreading chaos from neocon strategies is destabilizing Europe. As shocking and disturbing as that is, none of it should have come as much of a surprise, since the neocons have always brought chaos and dislocations in their wake.
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/09/0...ilized-europe/
Again, Meh. Maybe it will goad them into doing the right thing, which is quit relying on the US for their own security and build some militaries that can do more than nice looking parades.
, our best ally in the last few years has been France.
Let them in. You want islam to wither and die, let them realize how ed up their own countries are, and them drift away from their supers ions, just as most of the west is doing.
The difference between here and their own ed up countries is that here they get exposed to ideas and discussions that don't happen in most muslim countries.
Change happens. The "iden y" you cherish will be swamped by simple demographics within a few hundred years, if humans can even be said to exist by that time, once we really start tinkering with the genetic code, and machines become self-aware.
Tempest in a teacup. Worrying about that kind of is myopic and silly.
"less evolved"?
(shakes head)
You watch too many sci-fi movies. Evolution is just change in a genome. It isn't moving towards or away from anything. It just is.
Again, not quite bright enough to understand the concepts involved.
You're right they're not less evolved they are a different breed entirely
The European dependnce on US for security was created mostly by the US. The US created NATO and built all the bases in Europe. This all happned of course during the cold war.
We still live in the vestiges of the cold war. Us had just unlimited funds for their army until recently.
Still I doubt Europe can quit the US dependence even if they wanted to. Especially since the cold war might be making a comeback
LOL
At least you got closer, I guess.
They are increasing their defense spending. The Russian invasion of the Ukraine spurred that, especially in Poland.
It's the US again spending the $ for defense systems.
Lmao Russian invasion. More misguided than your racial beliefs.
They need to step up.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
