That can be arranged just the same with a flick of the pen.
On for round 10 tomorrow. Bye peeps.
That can be arranged just the same with a flick of the pen.
Why do you do this goal post move ? We're not talking about kings. We're talking about slavery. Focus.
Prove that the big bang is the beginning with nothing before. That is the your entire arguments basis in your typical reductio ad absurdum manner.
It's amusing when I point out how my paradigm works in atomics and telecom and your sole retort is a smilie after claims of supposed expertise. You lose.
Just because you cannot explain iyour supposed origin does not mean God = real. I gave several alternate realities that don't include your wishful thinking with empirical basis. Even if there is a first cause that does not mean Bible = true either.
More fail.
I don't really care about your personal interpretation of other verses that don't deal specifically with slavery. There are so many interpretations out there. That is a human construct.
I want to read it myself to see the Word of God.
Show me where God decided "slavery is evil" was as important as "mixed fabrics is bad". I'm sure Jesus thought not being evil was important. He talked about all sorts of things required to be a righteous person.
GOD chose to create a universe that could be corrupted by sin? God's choice, if one assumes he had a choice. Maybe he didn't? Which is it?
Original sin is another moral abomination.
Holding someone responsible for the crimes of others is evil.
Human sacrifice for the crimes of others is a moral abomination.
It is pretty much the kind of sick thing that barbarians thousands of years ago would imagine as part of their God Idea.
A fall from grace is not really all that original in terms of mythological themes. It is simply a common trope in the attempt to understand why bad things happen.
The more one reads of creation myths... the more mundane the dusty Adam and Lilith, er- meaty Eve are.
The Bad Thing of eating the Magic Fruit is not even overly unique. Humans all over the world have attempted to explain why they are different from animals.
The more we study the human brain, and its foibles, the more we learn about why such mythology arises, and why gods tend to act su iously like humans.
"I am a jealous God" is, again, not a unique mythological trope. What need would a perfect being have for being worshiped or praised?
That is quite literally the best primitive man could come up with.
We can do better.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 01-21-2016 at 09:32 AM.
Special pleading is a form of fallacious argument that involves an attempt to cite something as an exception to a generally accepted rule, principle, etc. without justifying the exception. [1][2]
The lack of criticism may be a simple oversight (e.g., a reference to common sense) or an application of a double standard.
A difficult case is when a possible criticism is made relatively immune to investigation. This immunity may take the forms of:
unexplained claims of exemption from principles commonly thought relevant to the subject matter
Example: I'm not relying on faith in small probabilities here. These are slot machines, not roulette wheels. They are different.
claims to data that are inherently unverifiable, perhaps because too remote or impossible to define clearly
Example: Cocaine use should be legal. Like all drugs, it does have some adverse health effects, but cocaine is different from other drugs. Many have benefited from the effects of cocaine.
In the classic distinction among informal (material), psychological, and formal (logical) fallacies, special pleading most likely falls within the category of psychological fallacy, as it would seem to relate to "lip service", rationalization and diversion (abandonment of discussion). Special pleading also often resembles the "appeal to" logical fallacies.[3]
Zeus is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.soph·ism
ˈsäfˌizəm/
noun
a fallacious argument, especially one used deliberately to deceive.
Jupiter is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.
Coyote is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.
Nu and Naunet Nu are Supernatural and supersede the natural realm.
Ra is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.
Mbombo is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.
Coatlicue is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.
Tengri is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.
Umay is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.
Kayra is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.
Ainu is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.
Papa smurf is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.
_________ is Supernatural and supersedes the natural realm.
Not a very convincing statement, when it comes to providing proof of the existence of something, or considering if an explanation is better than any other explanation.
But SCRIPTURE is special!
You are really being obtuse for the sake of being obtuse.
JESUS isn't recorded as having talked about abortion
JESUS isn't recorded as having talked about drug use
JESUS isn't recorded as having talked about alcoholism
JESUS isn't recorded as having talked about domestic abuse
JESUS isn't recorded as having talked about racism
JESUS isn't recorded as having talked about sexism
JESUS isn't recorded as having talked about any number of other issues.
That doesn't mean enough context can't be surmised from those things he did say:
IF HE specifically said,
"Love thy neighbor as thyself."
and
"Treat others the way you want to be treated."
NO WHERE WOULD that be an endorsement the cruel treatment of anyone else.
Only in your dense mind you want the specificity where CONTEXT is plenty.
You constantly define the framework of your criticisms so that you criticism can have any merit.
I am using your framework.
"Context" when it comes to talking about the bible seems to have a floating definition.
In context: Anything in the bible that gives you a warm fuzzy.
Out of context: Inconvenient child slaughter, human sacrifice and foreskin collecting.
You're purposely avoiding bible god's hypocrisy/contradictions. Why is that
So the only guidance is to be nice to my slaves.
Gotcha.
Jesus talked plenty about slavery. He just never said it was bad.
Had a chance to say "slavery is bad".Luke, Chapter 7, verse 2:
Now a centurion had a slave who was dear to him, who was sick and at the point of death. When he heard of Jesus, he sent to him elders of the Jews, asking him to come and heal his slave. And when they came to Jesus, they besought him earnestly, saying, "He is worthy to have you do this for him, for he loves our nation, and he built us our synagogue." And Jesus went with them. When he was not far from the house, the centurion sent friends to him, saying to him, "Lord, do not trouble yourself, for I am not worthy to have you come under my roof; therefore I did not presume to come to you. But say the word, and let my servant be healed. For I am a man set under authority, with soldiers under me: and I say to one, 'Go,' and he goes; and to another, 'Come,' and he comes; and to my slave, 'Do this,' and he does it." When Jesus heard this he marveled at him, and turned and said to the mul ude that followed him, "I tell you, not even in Israel have I found such faith." And when those who had been sent returned to the house, they found the slave well.
Didnt'.
Claim: The Bible never says a word against owning people as property.
This claim is specific and simple to refute in principle – all it would take is a Bible verse that says something along the lines of Article 4 of the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
God doesn't want me to covet my neighbors slaves and views them a property. Check.Exodus 20:17 (NRSV)
You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.
Christian slaves, obey your masters well – and obey your Christian masters especially well. Anyone who teaches otherwise is going against the words of Jesus, and has a morbid craving for disputes about words.1 Timothy 6:1-5 (NRSV)
Let all who are under the yoke of slavery regard their masters as worthy of all honor, so that the name of God and the teaching may not be blasphemed. Those who have believing masters must not be disrespectful to them on the ground that they are members of the church; rather they must serve them all the more, since those who benefit by their service are believers and beloved. Teach and urge these duties. Whoever teaches otherwise and does not agree with the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ and the teaching that is in accordance with godliness, is conceited, understanding nothing, and has a morbid craving for controversy and for disputes about words. From these come envy, dissension, slander, base su ions, and wrangling among those who are depraved in mind and bereft of the truth, imagining that godliness is a means of gain.
Christian slaves, be submissive to your masters. This teaching should be exhorted with authority. Do not let anyone look down on you for advocating slavery.us 2:9-10,15 (NRSV)
Tell slaves to be submissive to their masters and to give satisfaction in every respect; they are not to talk back, not to pilfer, but to show complete and perfect fidelity, so that in everything they may be an ornament to the doctrine of God our Savior. … Declare these things; exhort and reprove with all authority. Let no one look down on you.
You don't understand what 'original sin' means. It means our physical bodies have been tarnished by the effects of sin. They are no longer pure. We must die because of original sin. Were it not for the disobedience of Adam and Eve, our physical lives could have been immortal. Entropy exists because of the introduction of sin into our world.
Says the guy that doesn't even want to make them accountable for their own crimes.
Blood atonement was not the preferred method for the remission of sins - it became necessary though due to the hardness of man's heart.
The sacrificial system created a horrific, lasting image of how much GOD despised sin... GOD prefers genuine repentance... In fact, the message of the Bible is replete with the preaching of repentance for the forgiveness of sins... For example, when Nineveh was spared judgment from GOD, the city repented and their sins were forgiven - NO blood atonement was offered.
It's silly that you've hardened your heart to the extent that you would waste your time looking up all that stuff.
If YOU want to place them on equal footing with Christianity go right ahead - even while the scriptures are the most validated work from ancient antiquity. I'd like to see you try and subject them to the same scrutiny you kept insisting on for the Christian manuscripts that actually exist.
As I read those, only one of those sounds like it can explain the big bang singularity. None of the others do. And the one that did, you'd have to prove that said language existed prior to the Genesis account.
The Torah account from Genesis not only describes the singularity but begins with language that lays the groundwork for the modern understanding of physics (Time, Matter, Space -- all resulting from an Action/Cause). "A Physics Book" was never the intent of the Scripture but for the Book of Genesis to open up with this language is still significant.
Looks like I found quite a bit in the bible about slavery.
Just nothing that says its bad.
That seems to be enough context for me to decide God thinks slavery is ok.
I do not think slavery is ok. My moral code holds that is evil to deny rights of self direction.
Again, my moral code is superior to the bible god.
Why?
Because bible God is a fiction, designed by human beings who also thought slavery was ok. If they saw nothing wrong with the concept, why should the God they made up?
Bible God not saying anything about slavery being inherently bad fully supports that theory.
That is why you scream context to deflect the topic towards being nice to neighbors.
Prove that statement. Any of it.
That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
The concept of original sin remains an abomination. I have to die because someone else made a mistake. That punishes me with a limited lifespan for the crimes of someone else.
"JESUS talked plenty about slavery"
PRESENTS only one passage. The ONLY such reference.
"where He had a chance to say it was bad"
Such was the love of the master towards his 'slave' that he physically sought JESUS out to plead for the healing of the latter. Yeah what a cruel abominable master.
Yeah, you're not disingenuous at all.
And you clearly don't understand the nature of slavery in the context of that story. We don't know if said person received wages for serving the Centurion (as was customary in many parts). Or if the person was offered a roof over their head for work... You assume too much just for the sake of trying to plead for the groundwork of your cut-and-paste argument.
I have never advocated not holding someone responsible for their own actions. I hold that we should hold people accountable for their own actions.Fallacy: Straw Man
Description of Straw Man
The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and subs utes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position. This sort of "reasoning" has the following pattern:
Person A has position X.
Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X).
Person B attacks position Y.
Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because attacking a distorted version of a position simply does not cons ute an attack on the position itself. One might as well expect an attack on a poor drawing of a person to hurt the person.
soph·ism
ˈsäfˌizəm/
noun
a fallacious argument, especially one used deliberately to deceive.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 01-21-2016 at 05:26 PM.
soph·ism
ˈsäfˌizəm/
noun
a fallacious argument, especially one used deliberately to deceive.
"JESUS talks plenty about slavery."
Just take your lies elsewhere.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)