Reply With Quote
I'm not a lawyer. Just looks like he's trying to get the contempt rules for grand jury witnesses to apply to him so he can get out of jail now, even though he's a suspect.
^ thanks Rumpy.
What I mean is these are updated court procedings. What came down on the most recent court doings? If you follow that initial one I posted, the newest date ends up:
Mar 11, 2019
ECF FILER: SUMMARY OF ORAL ARGUMENT submitted by Attorney Keith M. Donoghue, Esq. for Appellant Francis Rawls. Case Summary: Whether the 18-month statutory maximum fixed by 28 U.S.C. section 1826 applies to imprisonment for civil contempt of a federal court order to produce unencrypted data by entering the password for a seized device.. Post Video: YES. [17-3205] (KMD) [Entered: 03/11/2019 11:04 AM]
I'm not a lawyer. Just looks like he's trying to get the contempt rules for grand jury witnesses to apply to him so he can get out of jail now, even though he's a suspect.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions