I don't think they'll be worried about that..
They'll be the third best team, but it'll be a distant third with a remote chance of winning (only due to injury chances which will be much higher for their own team). In that scenario it'd be better to start planning for the future and get the reloading process started sooner.
I don't think they'll be worried about that..
next year, it's going to be an empty space
Who is better? The Clippers?![]()
Acting as if going from the most impactful defensive player in the league to a "body" isn't a big deal is what doesn't make sense.
Between the Big 2, Porker, 40 year old Manu, Icy-Hot, and Fathead, I don't like our chances at all. I hope you're right though.
I'm sure he'd be much happier with the Suns.
Why all the panic? This is what happened when Lebron went to Miami. The Mavs and a Spurs team with no clear superstar/all star beat that team. Relax. The Warriors are guaranteed 4 great players but the other 4 to 6 are going to matter a whole bunch too
@ the tank movement
Spurs have the best two-way player in the NBA and a perennial all-star in his second season with the team. They have Pop and a deep bench full of players with different skills.
I know nothing is given - that's why they play the games. GSW still has to put the pieces together, and sometimes that's a lot harder than expected. The sad truth is that they will probably be as good as advertised. But, no, it's not a given.
More than anything, I'm doubtful about Tony's declining agility and ability to keep the offense moving against the better/younger teams in the league. That's why I think they're a 50 win team, give or take. It's got nothing to do with GS. Losing Tim is a HUGE adjustment, no matter how people try to shrug it off. The Spurs are weak in the middle, and weak at the point.
To be more than that, IMO, Tony would have to have an Indian Summer season. Kyle and Boban would have to have improved significantly this offseason. Danny would have to keep his 3P stroke from the playoffs, and Boris would have to get barred from Starbucks. That's a lot of "ifs". But think how great it will feel if they all step up?
As for Pau getting more than one year - I'm a big believer in the Sun Tzu idea of concentrating all your assets on a single point of attack. I don't want him choking up a huge chunk of cap next offseason. The Spurs need to be totally free to pick up one big player, and at least one big role-player. This offseason makes it pretty clear that they have to be able to jump in with a max offer right away, to show that big player that they are serious. Opinions are worth what you pay for them, but that's mine.
Me too. One more year please!
Yes. This is what I have been calling a mini-tank. Bite the bullet and finally get some youth - not just one young guy la la Kawhi. Let the young guys play their butts off and get your cap space for next off-season. We could still pick up a piece or two from the Blazers if they sign Pau.
But consider: Tim retires, Manu wants too much, so we let him walk... Would the possibility of a TP trade imrove... er, increase?
Agreed. Plus their bench taking somewhat of a hit (although they don't need much of a bench probably.)
He coulda re-signed with Portland
Why wouldn't the Spurs be second?
They were second this past season by a comfortable margin. OKC just got a lot worse and will have to adjust to losing both Durant and Ibaka.
The Clippers lost Jeff Green and Aldrich for nothing.
The Memphis big three are all coming off major injury concerns.
Portland added no one except Evan Turner at an absurd rate, he shouldn't scare anyone.
The Rockets added injury plagued non defenders.
Even if Duncan retires, how are the Spurs not number two but default?
Vegas odds post Durant's decision.
![]()
Sure, but SA can't tank. You realize that right? There is not lottery pick coming even if SA doesn't sign anyone. I'm fine with SA going youth only and just taking fliers on upside guys, but your lottery pick for one year idea is impossible.
Agree. Especially if Pau joins the Spurs.
Hope Tim retires...then unretires for the playoffs. But don't know how that works with salary cap.
For sure - SA doesn't have control either - Tim can retire. Pau can say no. Etc..Spurs have a lot of holes, but I do think, basketball wise that a SL of TP/DG/KL/DG/Pau is better than last year overall which is saying something. The bench, especially big men (guards are question marks too) is the issue.
But have to do what you can. I'm good with SA going youth, but doesn't seem like they are trying to do that. They want Pau. If he says no, people may be happy that it forces SA's hand to go youth only and focus on next year money-wise.
LMA is fine but he should be the only big out there ideally.
thunder had 2 bigs and were ahead 3-1
yea ibaka and adams, two of the best bigs at defending the pick and roll in the league
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)