Reply With Quote
Manure. In the same vein as the tired old bag Duncan. the tired old pile Manure.
I have no idea what the Pile is.
Spurs drafted the people I mentioned. Drafting and using are two different things. You don't have to agree, it's do ented history.
Manure. In the same vein as the tired old bag Duncan. the tired old pile Manure.
Last edited by Thread; 05-19-2016 at 09:38 AM.
Give me Ingram:
This kid needs to MAKE 10,000 jumpers a day this summer. His jumper is busted.
His shot IS broke ...
But so is Randle's ...
Leaning Ingram but still undecided ...
I have no idea where you're going with this. The Spurs draft history is available for anyone to view. You cherry picking specific ones to credit to the Spurs means nothing to anyone but you, and it's nonsensical.
We all know what's going to happen here.
Lakers will draft Simmons. Simmons will suck. Lakers will continue to suck.
Let us proceed...
Just settin', scratchin', ain't doin' much of anything.
Nuh uh. Beggars can't be choosers, Javier. You're stuck with him now.
Just want to give Laker fans a heads up that if we do end up with Ingram, a lot of "bust" talks will surface next season. He's IMO like Russell, a couple of years away from contributing whereas Simmons will be immediately regarded above his peers. Simmons is a transcendent player (NBA ready IMO) while Ingram will require tons of work to translate his success in the pros. Guys like Jaylen Brown, Skal and Buddy Hield may even put up a better rookie year.
But it's ok, if Ingram is our guy, know that we're getting him because of his promise, he's worth it IMO. He's unbelievably unique...
Simmons won't suck. He just won't be a rookie in the sense of having a mentor. He'll be looked upon to have composure and production, but he's going to be there with snitch and Randle and that's not going to do much to mentor the young'un. Lakers need a solid, mature front court to mentor their young players. They need someone like Garnett who can rein these young thunder cats in. Vince Carter would be another good choice.
Oh, yeah, he'd be a swell mentor. He's the one who got down on all fours and barked like a dog at a fellow union member.
I think Simmons is almost a guarantee to go first, Sixers are dying to have a product that contributes immediately. 3 of their last 5 picks hasn't seen much or any time at all(Embiid, Saric, Noel) He's the safest of the two.
We see how Kobe left the situation. At least Garnett wouldn't have some "look at me" parade for a ing year while two high draft picks were riding pine "we don't have time to develop our new guys because Kobe has to get token minutes" -Ex coach BS
Ain't nobody stopped the Lakers from building and developing cept Kupchak.
You criticize Tim for taking a pay cut to get talent and yet you pretend Kobe's ball and chain contract and his acidic, cancerous demeanor toward his teammates had nothing to do with the fact that the Lakers had absolutely nothing when he left. All those free agents came and left and didn't even leave a calling card. Yeah that was Mitch.
Only pussies & assholes play the grammar card.
Which is why I changed it, but I wasn't playing the grammar card. I was saying you did everything in your power to not blame anyone.
My ass.
Your boy killed the franchise like spraying Roundup™ on a garden. You criticize Tim for staying too long but at least Tim didn't raze the ing place to the ground on the way out.
Kobe: 5
the tired old bag Duncan: 2nd 5th
Lakers fans discussing about their top pick after a 17 wins season, 4 years after:
Still on the numbers business Cul ?
17 wins ? really ?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
