"In a post three days after the inauguration of Donald Trump, Christian posted, "If Donald Trump is the Next Hitler then I am joining his SS to put an end to Monotheist Question."
On that same day Christian, who shows support for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders on his Facebook page, posted a death threat about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ect/353963001/
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/...pOrufefGg.jpeg
all in for Trump![]()
he was beyond moonbat IMO
https://medium.com/@JasonTLouis/port...r-e8a7938405c7
Dude was faking
![]()
i agree that he was beyond moonbat. i'm not saying this was the fault of a politician.
but when people ascribe his hostility/violence towards muslims to trump... ask yourself which politician during the last election cycle showed the most anti-islam sentiment. the particular action he took has nothing to do with taxes, the 1%, free trade, free speech, the clinton foundation, minimum wage, black lives matter, etc... it was about his views towards muslims. how would you tie that sentiment to sanders or his campaign?
you're asking why people think he's a trump supporter. i'm explaining why based on the actions he is known for, it's a logical assumption. i'm not suggesting that trump is responsible. the killer isn't known because of his views on citizens united or tax policies... which is why bernie sanders is irrelevant to the discussion
anytime somebody commits a horrible act, it doesn't mean every group he is tangentially related to is responsible. if a guy kills his family, we dont say "omg, he worked for General Motors. they're so ing evil!" or "omg the guy went to college! they brainwashed him!" But when the act is related to the message or purpose of a group, that's when people start drawing parallels and connecting dots, its a natural thing to do imo. so if a black dude kills a white dude, i dont think as much of it because the cir stances are unknown. if the black dude was constantly posting online about how he wants white people to suffer, wants to kill white people for revenge for an injustice... then that becomes a story
of course, as aarony said in another thread, people nowadays have the tendency of looking at every piece of news and analyzing it from the perspective of left vs right... so that adds fuel to the fire as well
Last edited by spurraider21; 05-30-2017 at 01:50 PM.
Lol Trump ordering terrorist attacks thinking we'll stop focusing on his failures
I don't see a lot of media outlets spinning him as a Trump supporter and I'm not really sure why it matters if he was or wasn't.
His initial actions seem to stem from the desire to "shock" people with his non-PC opinions and bait them into reacting. I don't think either Trump or Sanders espouses that strategy, but it's not far off from the stuff you see from alt-right 4chan/Reddit/Russian posters.
Then he murdered two people who reacted. I'm not aware of anyone even in the tiest corners of the troll world who advocates that.
they start the piece with trump denouncing him
thats your fake news blaming trump? thats them "not blaming trump, per se"
Of course he was a Bernie supporter- spineless pussy who wanted to take someone else's life when he should have taken his own. I guess he's a cuckold by association and taking conspired Ls too.