DNC emails

[TheSanityAnnex]

Would you at least agreed that Trump turned this into a comical remark to a national security threat?

His comments simply backfired and gave the Clinton camp and the media plenty of things to attack him with.

Comical remark? Here was simply asking Russia to abide by treaty 106-22 signed by Bill Clinton

https://www.congress.gov/treaty-docu.../do ent-text


Treaty with Russia on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters

you are killing me Reck I needed this on a day home sick drinking hot tottys

[vy65]

Will hillaryclinton.com be too conservative for you?

“This has to be the first time that a major presidential candidate has actively encouraged a foreign power to conduct espionage against his political opponent. That’s not hyperbole, those are just the facts. This has gone from being a matter of curiosity, and a matter of politics, to being a national security issue.”


Source: http://www.hillaryclinton.com

The problem though is that the press release says the hacking is the national security issue -- not the emails themselves.

[StrengthAndHonor]

Dem's concerned about who hacked the leaks, not what was in the emails speaks volume of their intelligence tbh.

[RandomGuy]

She used a server to conduct official business, refuses/had refused to turn over emails -- emails that may or may not have been deleted, and the focus is on the idiocy coming out of Trumps mouth? People have their priorities out of whack.

Right. We should be focusing on which children we prefer to have starve to death. How could we forget about that priority.

Any particular children you want to watch starve today?

[StrengthAndHonor]

The problem though is that the press release says the hacking is the national security issue -- not the emails themselves.

The Russians didn't hack her sever but th Russians leaked her email. Silly cow waffles even on her own defense.

[TheSanityAnnex]

He didn't exactly say "hack the emails". Seemed to me that he was implying that if the Rooskies had hacked them in the past, he would welcome the disclosure of US classified information to the press.

S my thing to say, per par with his other sleazy remarks.

Should I be trying to prove some other s my thing? I'm not following you here.

of course he didn't, hacking now would be impossible, yet those are the headlines the left, and Reck, are pushing.

See below post on treaty 106-22 with Russia.

[vy65]

Right. We should be focusing on which children we prefer to have starve to death. How could we forget about that priority.

Any particular children you want to watch starve today?

Wtf does that have to do with anything?

ITT we're talking about the tiness of the candidate you're semen-shielding for. Stay on topic please.

[vy65]

RG too ing stupid to realize when I make a pro-Hilary/anti-Trump comment. :rofl

[TheSanityAnnex]

The problem though is that the press release says the hacking is the national security issue -- not the emails themselves.

Trump was just asking for mutual legal assistance that Russia promised in a treaty signed by Bill Clinton

[RandomGuy]

Wathc him do some more mental gymnast.

People who try to argue a point with TSA never seem to get through. He always has to be right.

Of course not.

The hallmark of the zealot is to never, ever, admit fault in the pre-existing belief system. Phenomanul cannot admit that his bible God did some s my things, and papers over mass murder, and all sorts of other evil things.

In this case, he can't admit the Trump said something ed or s my.

One of the basic tenets of good critical thinking is intellectual honesty, and idealogues know at some level that they are being irrational, which is why they will either never be able to admit fault, or like tlong, refuse to follow what should be fair questions.

All of which feeds into evidence of a fairly consistent pattern in conservative politics: pure irrationality. The more one sees stuff put forth here, the obvious that is.

[RandomGuy]

Trump was just asking for mutual legal assistance that Russia promised in a treaty signed by Bill Clinton

Link?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Link?

https://www.congress.gov/treaty-docu.../do ent-text

[RandomGuy]

RG too ing stupid to realize when I make a pro-Hilary/anti-Trump comment. :rofl

vy too ing stupid to think I would pass up an opportunity to throw your evil back in his face, no matter what the intent of his remark was.

"priorities" (snorts)

[RandomGuy]

https://www.congress.gov/treaty-docu.../do ent-text

No, you stupid , I want you to post a link to trump outlining what he really meant.

Still waiting. Your claim, your burden of proof.

Trump was just asking for mutual legal assistance that Russia promised in a treaty signed by Bill Clinton

[vy65]

vy too ing stupid to think I would pass up an opportunity to throw your evil back in his face, no matter what the intent of his remark was.

"priorities" (snorts)

I am really sad for you that you feel the need to convince people of your worth through your incessant and sanctimonious virtue signalling. It is truly ing depressing.

[RandomGuy]

Will hillaryclinton.com be too conservative for you?

“This has to be the first time that a major presidential candidate has actively encouraged a foreign power to conduct espionage against his political opponent. That’s not hyperbole, those are just the facts. This has gone from being a matter of curiosity, and a matter of politics, to being a national security issue.”


Source: http://www.hillaryclinton.com

vy's point though is exactly relevant.

The "national security issue" is that a major candidate is actively encouraging a foreign power to meddle in US politics by disclosing stolen data.

[RandomGuy]

I am really sad for you that you feel the need to convince people of your worth through your incessant and sanctimonious virtue signalling. It is truly ing depressing.

Meh. You said something I find extremely morally objectionable. Could I be less of a jerk about it? Sure. I find the sentiment extremely hard to forgive, and emblematic as to what is wrong with conservative politics in general, i.e. an underlying streak of immorality.

[TheSanityAnnex]

No, you stupid , I want you to post a link to trump outlining what he really meant.

Still waiting. Your claim, your burden of proof.

You already posted a link to what he said/meant.

He said if they already had Clinton's 30,000 deleted private emails to turn them over. You said earlier this meant he was asking them to turn over classified US material. Hillary Clinton said there was nothing classified in those private emails. Either you are wrong or Hillary was lying.

Trump will just say Hillary said there was nothing classified on them, he's got his bases covered.

[RandomGuy]

You already posted a link to what he said/meant.

He said if they already had Clinton's 30,000 deleted private emails to turn them over. You said earlier this meant he was asking them to turn over classified US material. Hillary Clinton said there was nothing classified in those private emails. Either you are wrong or Hillary was lying.

Trump will just say Hillary said there was nothing classified on them, he's got his bases covered.

So you can't back up your statement.

Thanks for clearing that up.

Anything else you want to claim without proof? Or is it just this one thing?

[TheSanityAnnex]

vy's point though is exactly relevant.

The "national security issue" is that a major candidate is actively encouraging a foreign power to meddle in US politics by disclosing stolen data.

No, the "national security issue" is if the Russians ACTUALLY have classified information hacked from Hillary's illegal private home brew server. She is the only one responsible for this "national security issue". Your deflection attempts are pathetic. And you constantly speak of intellectual honesty, please

[RandomGuy]

No, the "national security issue" is if the Russians ACTUALLY have classified information hacked from Hillary's illegal private home brew server. She is the only one responsible for this "national security issue". Your deflection attempts are pathetic. And you constantly speak of intellectual honesty, please

So now you are an expert as to what the Clintons meant in their press release, as well as able to read Trumps mind.

Impressive.

[TheSanityAnnex]

So you can't back up your statement.

Thanks for clearing that up.

Anything else you want to claim without proof? Or is it just this one thing?

the mutual assistance line was an obvious joke...but the treaty is real.

[Reck]

the mutual assistance line was an obvious joke...but the treaty is real.

a joke.

ing ..

[RandomGuy]

the mutual assistance line was an obvious joke...but the treaty is real.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said, staring directly into the cameras during a news conference. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Trump was just asking for mutual legal assistance that Russia promised in a treaty signed by Bill Clinton

Link?

I don't see Trump mentioning any treaty with Russia in his remarks.

Maybe you can provide a quote where he talks about that treaty?

[TheSanityAnnex]

So now you are an expert as to what the Clintons meant in their press release, as well as able to read Trumps mind.

Impressive.

Buckle up RG, these upcoming email dumps are going to be brutal. Your an honest dude, I'm just waiting to see how long it takes you to admit you've been duped by the Clinton's. and before you say I'm duped by Trump, stop, I'm not.

My vote is purely against Clinton. her.