The Clinton's should retire somewhere in Arizona or something. A while back I read an article where the daughter was looking to run for a local something here in New York.
to be fair thats how obama got on the map
The Clinton's should retire somewhere in Arizona or something. A while back I read an article where the daughter was looking to run for a local something here in New York.
Some critics alleged that the photo might have been staged, citing evidence that the woman, Margot Gerster, had previously met Clinton at a fundraiser hosted by Gerster’s parents.
Dumb still can't let any "real" people near her
Without Wasserman fixing it for her, I doubt it. Then again Schumer is still in DNC leadership so you never know.
Yeah thats another fake story. They flooded the airwaves with fake stories like this. Spent a billion dollars.... and lost![]()
Reck what about Andrew Cuomo
The Sanders/Warren schtick would never win. A lot of the northeast would even go red
I heard she wants to run for Mayor of NYC.
Hillary has lost twice. I'm pretty sure she's done.
She and Bill are worth $10Ms. (So, USA politicians' goal of) Mission Accomplished. (get (more) wealthy)
She wanted to go back in there, and this time she would lead the procession.
No.
ADDENDUM:::Without the power the money holds no value to [Clinton]. Now? That $ is a reminder of Trump cleanin' her in' clock. And her old man's too.
Cuomo is even more corrupt than the Clintons.
Better have someone who doesn't have a mile of baggage.
You shud have said that before you threw your support at Clintler![]()
Practically nobody over 30 and not in Hollywood would vote for a true openly socialist candidate for president.
Better to trot out a moderate like Cuomo, Dianne Feinstein, O'Malley, than an alt-leftist.
I seriously think that the Democrats should run Mark Cuban...
Time for new leadership 'n shiiiieeeet
http://www.blackvoicenews.com/2016/1...c-black-women/
Dear God, please let the DNC go insane and appointThe leadership of the Democratic Party, at the highest levels, has consisted of mostly White men and women and a handful of Latinos. What Democratic leadership in the United States Congress, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) doesn’t have — and has never had — is a representative from its most loyal voting bloc over the last three presidential elections: Black women. To say that all quarters of Democratic Party leadership is in need of change is a vast understatement.
The numbers don’t lie. The Democratic Party has lost a historic number of seats across the board from federal representatives to statehouse races. Part of that shift is due to a realignment caused by the appearance of the first Black president. But another part of it is a lack of strategy and misallocation of millions of dollars in resources focused on the wrong voters. While Democrats roll out the same old leaders who employ the same old losing consultants and staff, they ignore members of their most consistently loyal voting group: Black women.
The 2016 election was, in some ways, a powerful statement on who remains loyal to the Democratic Party and who doesn’t. On that note, Latino voters shocked and confused everyone by giving Donald “build a wall” Trump nearly 30 percent of their votes.
In 2012, more than 70 percent of Black women voted, while White women voted at 65.6 percent. Black women continue to make up a larger proportion of Democratic votes than any other subgroup. Given all the research, the Democratic Party continues to chase and reward other groups. One would think that ensuring that African Americans get to the polls would become a number one priority at the DNC and DCCC or to anyone campaigning for the White House. Instead, the party continues to chase voters who seem to have less loyalty to the party than Black women, spending millions, while losing elections.
More than half of White women (53 percent) voted for Donald Trump. Meanwhile, just 4 percent of African American women and 26 percent of Hispanic women voted for the reality TV star.
Why shouldn’t Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), Marcia Fudge (D-OH), Joyce Beatty (D-OH), Alma Adams and Rep-Elect Val Demings (D-Fla.) serve in leadership? They’re part of the most reliable voting bloc for the Democratic Party and Fudge, Beatty, Adams and Demings are from key swing states. Who better to figure out how to win voters in other sectors than the members of the sector who’ve already shown support? Who better to lead than a former college administrator, a former mayor in a swing state or a former police chief in a battleground state?to lead it and fill out it's ranks.
![]()
The democrats really should have moved on Ryan as the minority leader. They need to start focusing on people who work or who want to work. Not everyone wants a handout.
O'Malley is who I had initially backed. He was the first one who called out the DNC for being crooked towards Hillary. Nobody wanted to listen until it was too late.
CC has been monitoring this for some time now
You still love her, just admit it.
I don't recall anyone on this board here ever loving her
and weren't people here claiming she was going to run for mayor/governor of new york or some ?![]()
Cuban has already said he would run as a Republican. Hopefully he runs against Trump in the primary and wins.
They have access to billions, and they don't want the gravy train to stop once they're no longer relevant. They're counting on chumpettes to keep them going.
There's no chumpette denunciation thread forthcoming.
#StillWithHer
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)