a trade too bad for words.
Kings holding out b/c of Collison.![]()
a trade too bad for words.
you get rid of parker not just for this season but because he's on the books for next season as well.
would trade parker for an injured cp3.
we'll drop in the standings, doesn't matter. basketball is a game of matchups but if you wanna win the championship, you shouldn't need to avoid anyone.
i'll take cp3 + kawhi in playoffs over curry + durant, over lebron + kyrie.
Spurs definitely need more playmaking, but I'm not sure Pop would even play another guard above Parker/Ginobili/Mills even if they were struggling. IMO Spurs need to target another 3&D guy (emphasis on the D) to play when LDN is ineffective and can play over Simmons if needed. Hollis Thompson sounded like a great candidate but I haven't seen any news on what he's doing.
Would be awesome if RC could dupe Miami into taking the Pork for Dragic before he starts being again, tbh.
while i agree with most of what you said... hollis thompson is not a difference maker.
They're not gonna make any significant trades, let's be real. Hollis Thompson wouldn't cost them anything while providing a lot of what Green can do (albeit not quite as good). He's also played in a Spurs-like system before with Brown up in Philly so his learning curve wouldn't be too rough.
i agree with you. i just think it's moot only acquiring him. the needle doesn't move so much.
It won't move much, but if he can play like he did in the 15-16 season he can definitely be a contributor when the Spurs need another defender with length for small-ball. As of now I don't really see another known player out there that would add much to the team; the buyout market may yield something but for now they can't do better.
wolves talking to the pistons about swapping rubio for reggie jackson. wolves wanna include shabazz in the deal.
if that doesn't pan out, this math works:
and i would see what else the wolves would want.
Dedmon could be another challenge in the offseason. I would hope we can keep him but the he's looking quite good, and I think we are going to have cap challenges, see http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8869321
The argument against, is the what has happened with Baynes and Boban, both got snagged from us for contracts we couldn't/wouldn't match, and haven't performed as well when they left...
But, as an assumption, the Spurs believe they will not be able to resign Dedmon. How about trading Dedmon for Nurkic?
Denver has capspace (projected at ~$19 Million) to resign Dedmon if he works out with them, and if not it's only a rental for them. They are looking for a partner to trade Nurkic to.
Nurkic is worse than Dedmon, but younger, and has shown promise - and is still on his rookie contract next year. So he needs to be resigned in 2018, when we have capspace.
I think there would need to be some picks/prospects moved to make it balance though.
I'm not trading Dedmon unless I get a better player back for right now.
Throw in Anderson just to get him off the team and I'll consider it.
Just kidding. Rubio sucks.
Just take Anderson for free.
Trade Anderson for a top 50 protected 2021 2nd round pick.
Use the spot to sign Hollis Thompson to a 2-3 yr non guaranteed deal.
Any fathead trade you propose, I'm gonna bump.![]()
Okafor is being shopped for a pick, I think he still has alot of upside. Think the Spurs have put in intrest to Philly for him? This dude probably would play more aggressively around the rim than Aldridge. Hes still young and with the right development he can be good.
Any scenario you think the Spurs would have intrest in Melo? Parker+Anderson for Melo?![]()
Last edited by Spurs9; 02-07-2017 at 12:39 PM.
phil jackson wanted lma. clippers wants melo. i want cp3.
something along the lines of:
spurs get cp3
clippers get melo
knicks get lma and parker
Danny Green, Patty, and a late first round pick should easily get it done tbh
No way I trade Danny for Okafor. No way do I trade 2 rotational guards for Okafor.
No way I keep D-League (overpaid) and Microwave (who will leave after the season)
At this point I wouldn't be opposed to a trade for Lou Williams. Spurs could send them Patty and another piece (Forbes?) along with a second round pick to get it done. Not sure the Lakers would be willing to trade him and for that package, but he shouldn't be part of their long-term plans considering he's on the other side of 30.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)