Reply With Quote
i said donna might need it.
"THE BEST PEOPLE" - he said it loud and proud.
i said donna might need it.
The best alien non-American people to cook and serve food.
Name one.
sanctuary cities aren't breaking any laws. it is uncons utional for the feds to compel that sort of state action. the federal government cannot force a state to enact legislation or to enforce federal law. that would be a violation of the 10th amendment.
the only power the feds have in such a situation is to withhold funding, but even that has limits. if the amount withheld is great enough to the point that it is considered coercion, that is also a violation of the 10th amendment
if the feds want to enforce immigration laws, then they need more ICE officers and immigration offices. you cant compel the states to do your bidding
How about 55?Timely request, too.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-wage-workers/
i would defer to law enforcement... if the chief of police of big cities suggest that the "sanctuary city" policies make it easier for them to communicate and cooperate with their communities, then i would trust their judgment on that.
as they're not required to enforce federal law, it's to their discretion. i'll trust the community police's insight over some bureaucrat in washington deciding what local policy is better or worse
He mopped the in' floor with her in' ass.
And he regrets it.
omg lol
Still waiting on a name. No Jose or Lupita. No Ching or Chong. I will be up late.
“That means, according to Congress, a city that prohibits its officials from providing information to federal immigration authorities — a sanctuary city — is violating the law. Sanctuary cities, like San Francisco, block their jails from turning over criminal aliens to federal authorities for deportation.”
— White House statement in response to judge’s ruling on President Trump’s executive order on “sanctuary” jurisdictions, April 25, 2017
So you want me to name someone that hasn't been hired yet?
You feeling OK?
Pastefinger cramping up?
a statement by the white house doesn't override the cons ution and SCOTUS precedent
it it really was illegal, than instead of "cutting funding" they would just challenge the cities in federal court
So they don't exist.
Fake news.And yet, he goes out of his way to hire foreigners to work at his resorts.
as the "sanctuary city" designations are not formal state statutes, they aren't violations (the first half of this quote).For example, say you’re an employee of a city government and you found out someone who applied for benefits was an undo ented immigrant. If you want to report that person’s immigration status to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the government cannot forbid you from doing so without violating Section 1373. But the federal government also could not force the city government to report that person’s information to ICE.
when the federal government compels state officials to enforce federal law, that is "commandeering" which is a violation of the 10th amendment
you'd be happy to know that this very doctrine was used to strike down federal gun control legislation that was pushed by the clinton administration when they tried to force sheriffs (state officials) to conduct background checks (federal law)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printz_v._United_States
Last edited by spurraider21; 07-20-2017 at 11:01 PM.
He has already employed hundreds.
Fake news.Poor Chris.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/28/news...ers/index.htmlMost of the requests for foreign workers concerned the Mar-a-Lago Club, Trump's exclusive crown jewel property that is both a resort and sports club, nestled on the water of Palm Beach. In the past 10 years, 849 foreign guest workers were approved for the resort. Most of those were for servers, cooks, housekeepers or other similar positions.
A majority of these workers were brought in on what is known as H-2B visas and came from a small group of countries, according to current and former workers. The countries of preference: Romania and South Africa.
"Sanctuary cities, like San Francisco, block their jails from turning over criminal aliens to federal authorities for deportation."
What's your opinion on this part?
this got uses a white house statement as a legal argument
stick to wrestling, idiot.
check my edit above, first, for some additional context to the "commandeering" principle, so that you dont think it's just some recently invented liberal activist hoax
second, SF's doesn't turn over aliens that do not have violent felonies. it's not a blanket refusal.
What part about hire American buy American don't you understand? You can point the finger to something that supposedly happened in the past, but the reality is Trump is putting America first now and it's time to take out the trash.
Can't believe you read this:
and came up with this:
Still waiting on a name. tick tockAnd yet, he goes out of his way to hire foreigners to work at his resorts.
Oh look, a random troll with some random shade! Just put me on your ignore list got
stick to wrestling, idiot.
The high court has also prohibited the federal government from “commandeering” the states by forcing them to work for the feds at their own expense by actively enforcing federal law. As Ronald Reagan reminded us in his first inaugural address, the states formed the federal government, not the other way around. They did so by ceding 16 discrete powers to the federal government and retaining to themselves all powers not ceded.
If this cons utional truism were not recognized or enforced by the courts, the federal government could effectively eradicate the sovereignty of the states or even bankrupt them by forcing them to spend their tax dollars enforcing federal law or paying for federal programs.
Thus the Trump dilemma. He must follow the Cons ution, or the courts will enjoin him as they have his predecessor. He cannot use a stick to bend the governments of sanctuary cities to his will, but he can use a carrot. He can ask Congress for legislative grants of funds to cities conditioned upon their compliance with certain federal immigration laws.
^judge napolitano
Illegal immigrant. Say it with me I-L-L-E-G-A-L ILLEGAL immigrantcheck my edit above, first, for some additional context to the "commandeering" principle, so that you dont think it's just some recently invented liberal activist hoax
second, SF's doesn't turn over aliens that do not have violent felonies. it's not a blanket refusal.
There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)
Posting Permissions