Reply With Quote
I’ve worked for a bank in ones of its commercial real estate lending groups, all the large banks have been handing out cheap floating rate debt like candy the last 10 years to any borrowers who have a good relationship with them.
Thou shalt have no other gods before me
I’ve worked for a bank in ones of its commercial real estate lending groups, all the large banks have been handing out cheap floating rate debt like candy the last 10 years to any borrowers who have a good relationship with them.
So then trump should sue them for defamation and business disparagement, right? If this is all fake then he’d have a valid claim.
“Protected sources”
In college if I wrote a paper, but did not cite my sources, I would get a zero out of one hundred grade.
So it’s all made up fake news? Trump should sue for defamation then, right?
The point is that you are supposed to have proof before you are indicted. There’s no proof. As of now, it is propaganda
So is the story fake or not? Journalists run stories without naming their sources all the time. This isn’t a college paper you’re writing in some stupid Poly Sci class.
So in this country is it innocent until proven guilty or guilty until proven innocent? If its the latter, don’t about any more police shootings
says the guy talking about all of clintons crimes
the evidence would be the returns. lets see if anybody disputes the authenticity of them. if not, who cares if the source is anonymous or not
Are you suggesting there is no evidence on the Clinton crimes?
the evidence would be the returns. lets see if anybody disputes the authenticity of them. if not, who cares if the source is anonymous or not
you're willing to apply innocent until proven guilty or POTUS, but not the clintons. interesting
and nobody is trying trump in a criminal case. the public can see his tax returns and make of them what they will. the court of public opinion is different than a criminal court
Who are the gods here accordiing to you?
Does your dumb ass not know the difference between a published story and a conviction in a court of law or being shot? God damn conservatives are melodramatic.
Don't worry, your cult leader is not going to face any criminal charges over this.
you've been treating trump as a deity since 2016
his tax returns don't show loans, liabilities?
so his NET worth, assets - liabilities, is unknown
he flatters his ROTTEN LYING NO GOOD self as "King of Debt"
He LIED in 2015 that he was WORTH $10B,
and supporters were saying that he would finance his campaign out of pocket to be obligated to donors, creditors
"There’s no way to assess the veracity of the reporting without the returns being published," said Matt Mackowiak, a Texas-based Republican political consultant. "The New York Times says they have them. Why not publish them? There are only two possible explanations: They were illegally acquired or they don’t exist
his tax returns don't show loans, liabilities?
so he NET worth, assets - liabilities, is unknown
He LIED in 2015 that he was WORTH $10B,
and supporters were saying that he would finance his campaign out of pocket and then be obligated to nobody
Has anyone in office not lied once?
Have you lied ?
Who are the gods here according to you?
NYTimes got Trash's tax info?
Barr will be investigating/prosecuting that leak at daybreak Monday morning, at latest.
Maybe make some sense next time
Good thing Trump knows what he paid so he can easily sue dat lying New York Times
No ones saying this news story makes him criminally liable for anything. You’re grasping at a weak strawman.
So is the story fake or not?
Robby Starbuck? How to combine a boring name and also make it fruity.
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)
Posting Permissions
