lmao most of my replies are like 2-3 sentences if that; some a bit longer and i'll give you that but you're definitely inflating the numbers no doubt. it is tiring when you're dealing with a child(pavThe ) and his lame internet shtick(1 thousand stupid ing questions that go nowhere).
none of the above. my real gripe is asshole nerds getting away with bs here. not only that but they're all weak assholes too who have found their spines only on the internet behind a keyboard. as bad as the back and forth goes i am merely trying to show their true colors to you all but by doing so i am making myself out to be just as bad i suppose. these are the days of our lives...
Depends what you mean by "next time around". The author isn't talking about another '08 type of crisis. The Fed will always do everything in it's power in that scenario. I don't expect the Fed to change course over a pullback or mild recession, which I think is what the author is talking about.
Personally I think they are being too aggressive and just might do that. Have to see what 2019 brings as unwinding QE in earnest has only just begun.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ning-quicktake
Some say that will have the economic affect of an additional 3% hike in interest rates, so if they also raise interest rates too fast they can easily break something.
What Message Is Melania Trump Sending With Her Red Christmas Trees of Death?
https://slate.com/human-interest/201...ions-2018.html
Pavlov is the Sentinelese of ST?
but you cannot blame Chumpy, he's a troll
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...ued-foundation
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-c...ump-foundation
This will not go away, and magnify his legal troubles, more than likely implicating his adult children.Circling back to our previous coverage, the New York attorney general’s office in June accused the Trump Foundation of being little more than a slush fund, which, among other things, made illegal in-kind contributions for Trump’s campaign.
The scope of the legal issues raised by the New York court filing is quite broad. There are, for example, questions surrounding the president and his family allegedly running a fraudulent charitable en y. There are additional questions about violations of federal election law, which appear to have been quite flagrant.
There’s also the fact that the president personally signed federal tax returns – under penalty of perjury – swearing that his foundation wasn’t used for political and/or business purposes, and we now know there’s quite a bit of evidence that suggests it was used for both.
Jenny Johnson Ware, a criminal tax attorney in Chicago, told the New York Times in June: “People have gone to prison for stuff like this, and if I were representing someone with facts like this, assuming the facts described in this pe ion are true, I would be very worried about an indictment.”
As Rachel has noted on the show, the New York Times also reported that the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance “has opened an investigation into whether the Donald J. Trump Foundation violated state tax laws, a move that could lead to a criminal referral for possible prosecution.”
Mnuchin is in the hot seat now. Is it Trump’s tax returns?
Yesterday Peter Nicholas, Nick Timiraos and Bob Davis reported in the Wall Street Journal that President
Trump has been telling insiders of his disappointment in Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, blaming him
for the stock market’s recent decline
and for rising interest rates.
Although Trump later called the WSJ article “FAKE NEWS”, there’s likely fire underneath all that smoke.
Trump might replace Mnuchin with an even Trumpier toady for a reason he might not divulge, even to insiders: his tax returns.
Next year, incoming House Ways and Means Committee chair Richard Neal (D-MA) will likely ask the IRS for a copy of the Trump family’s tax returns as part of the committee’s investigation into their dubious financial dealings.
Congress has the right to do this under Section 6103 of the tax code, passed after the Teapot Dome scandal of the 1920s
the bottom line for Trump is whether Mnuchin will eventually release the returns, and Mnuchin has already signaled that he will follow the law.
Trump can’t be happy about this.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
I am pretty sure the protocol is to go through the IRS - legally. Trump won't have a choice - this is also how Mueller got ahold of them.Mnuchin is in the hot seat now. Is it Trump’s tax returns?
Yesterday Peter Nicholas, Nick Timiraos and Bob Davis reported in the Wall Street Journal that President
Trump has been telling insiders of his disappointment in Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, blaming him
for the stock market’s recent decline
and for rising interest rates.
Although Trump later called the WSJ article “FAKE NEWS”, there’s likely fire underneath all that smoke.
Trump might replace Mnuchin with an even Trumpier toady for a reason he might not divulge, even to insiders: his tax returns.
Next year, incoming House Ways and Means Committee chair Richard Neal (D-MA) will likely ask the IRS for a copy of the Trump family’s tax returns as part of the committee’s investigation into their dubious financial dealings.
Congress has the right to do this under Section 6103 of the tax code, passed after the Teapot Dome scandal of the 1920s
the bottom line for Trump is whether Mnuchin will eventually release the returns, and Mnuchin has already signaled that he will follow the law.
Trump can’t be happy about this.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
Allegedly.
According to Gallup, Trump is the only president in the modern era whose job approval ratings have never been above 50%.
Iirc, didn't Gallup not participate in 2016 elections because they messed up 2012 elections so badly? I don't know if I'd be putting much stock in any poll - much less Gallup's.
Maybe he's just not very popular.
38% today
he looks like Elvis, he says
Wow, that's really screwing domestic producers hard.
Congratulations?
Cheering for murderers good now?
The White House counsel's office is reportedly in desperate need of staffers
Republicans close to the Trump administration told Politico on Monday that the White House counsel's office is woefully understaffed, and
once Democrats take control of the House,
the few people working there will have a difficult time dealing with subpoenas for do ents.
There are about 25 lawyers now working in the office,
down from a high of 35 and
well below the 40 needed to deal with investigation requests,
https://theweek.com/speedreads/80949...-gassed-border
Well, he did say he was going to bring jobs back - he is single-handedly flooding the attorneys working on cases in D.C.
lol America first
Yet you can’t help but getting sucked into the Chump circus
Pavlov is the Sentinelese of ST?
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
