Trump President. Not Clinton.
That why he under investigation, not Clinton.
Let's get to work...by not involving democrats to work on like healthcare and so on.
Obamacare is/was a disaster. Millions of Americans lost their doctors and saw their interests skyrocket. Why would we want Dems anywhere near our healthcare?Let's get to work...by not involving democrats to work on like healthcare and so on.
Because at least we wouldn't have healthcare that is at 12% aproval?
Republicans know even less than the democrats when it comes to healthcare. At least Obamacare has decent aproval ratings and suddenly people that hated it want it to stay.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/207671/af...irst-time.aspx
In September. I get that this type of thing is difficult for you though.
Trump President. Not Clinton.
Special counsel Robert Mueller has not yet decided whether to investigate President Donald Trump as part of a wide-ranging Russia probe, according to ABC News.
In a report on the outlet's Sunday show, "This Week," ABC News senior justice correspondent Pierre Thomas said his choice will be "momentous."
"Now my sources are telling me he's begun some preliminary planning," Thomas said. "Plans to talk to some people in the administration. But he's not yet made that momentous decision to go for a full-scale investigation."
Just as an aside Culver's is giving away a one scoop/two toppings sundae today for Father's Day. Not all of them, but, some. I'm going to venture over about 8PM in hopes the line ain't too long. If it's too long I may just jockey over to Smashburger and get that chocolate shake. It's the best over the counter shake I've ever experienced.
We unfortunately do not have a Culvers or a Smashburger in the area but that sounds delicious. I can say with certainty that the Olmos Pharmacy in San Antonio has the best shakes I have ever tasted.
You guys have quite the circle jerk going on.
BTW, Trumps disapproval rating amongst GOP voters is up to 25%. It is the highest it has ever been.
http://www.newsweek.com/trumps-lates...igation-626723
After the election and how the media/polls got it wrong, why would anyone believe in any polls? If anything, I'd think his support would be stronger with all the rubbish that's going on - not that his supporters would take kindly to answering these polls (truthfully) anyway. Congress needs to get off their butts and pass stuff for him to sign. I am weary and wary about all these EOs which can be reversed easily.
the polls showed hrc winning the popular vote by a few % pts, and she did.
how many times does this have to be pointed out to you re s?
Because they also claimed that there was a 98+% chance of Hillary being POTUS.
Just before he mopped the in' floor with her in' ass.
The polls weren't that far off. They had Clinton winning the national vote by 4 points and she only won by 2. It's a pretty standard margin of error in presidential elections, and as Nate Silver kept writing, a 1.5 point polling error in Trump's favor would be enough to give him the election because the Clinton firewall was extremely fragile. The pundits who analyzed the polls and implicitly treated the states like independent random variables were who screwed up.
can you die soon please? thanks in advance.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
