Reply With Quote
The trade deficit is bad why?
The trade deficit is bad why?
Fact-checking Sean Hannity's claim on the U.S. accepting 250,000 refugees
https://www.politifact.com/punditfac...trump-hannity/
still a Fake Story...
Trash's AmeriKKKa The B.E.A.U.tiful
Please use your brain
Use yours, why?
Close
Close
As the white population continues to decrease in America, whites will increasingly side with white supremacist defenders like Trump.Trash's AmeriKKKa The B.E.A.U.tiful
Does that surprise you? If white Americans fought the Japanese 75 years ago, why do you expect them to lay down and accept the replacement attempt now?
You've clearly been surrounded with weak willed white Americans if you thought the demographic would react differently.
Last edited by FrostKing; 01-19-2019 at 04:42 AM.
I agree. Full free reciprocal trade allows the rational exchange of goods and services and lowers prices for consumers everywhere. Trade deficits don't matter.
A tariff on any imported goods is essentially a tax on all Americans being paid directly to the industry that lobbied for the tax. Let's say that a widget being produced in both China and the US sells for $1.00. Now Trump puts a 25% tariff on widgets produced in China and imported into the US. Now, the US widget manufacturer can suddenly sell his widget to the US at $1.25 while the rest of the world still pays $1.00 for the widget. It's a direct 25% sales tax paid by US citizens directly to the widget manufacturer.
Big facts
Hopefully the internet does its thing and finds this gots name tbh.
unfortunately,yes.
what you cannot correct you can at least insult, right?
It's being investigated and it's a group of Catholic students from Kentucky. The funny thing is I bet some of those kids claim to be 1/16th native American too.
Wow, everyone was really waiting for that yuge announcement today.
That kid needs a whipping, tbh
Extension of DACA/TPS protection is not amnesty. The wall/fence is permanent - the other is 3 years.
That's why it's a non-starter
It's Ann Coulter, you take it for what it's worth (nothing basically)
Pelosi’s premature rejection is a hypocritical renunciation of support for policies that Democrats once supported and – in some cases – still pay lip service to today.
Indeed, just five years ago, 54 Senate Democrats voted to double a portion of a southern barrier with Mexico, end chain migration, end the diversity visa lottery, and spend $40 billion on border security (almost eight times what the president is asking for now!).
So what changed?
The person sitting in the Oval Office changed. Democrats now reject the very proposals they once voted for when President Obama sat in the same office.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
