didnt realize sweden was communist
didnt realize sweden was communist
Both Sweden and Denmark prime ministers had public conferences asking US democrats to stop calling them socialist countries when they are capitalists.
and yet you call people socialists and communists for wanting to implement their laws
They have elements of both just like we do.
Only I would say their governments lean more towards helping citizens not as fortunate.
"consensus"
Bible-humpers don't need no evidence. Just make up "revealed" and believe it
Trash returns The Old Lesbian From SC's RABID loyalty
Trump taunts Jeff Sessions for Senate race flop:
‘Didn’t have courage to end Russia Witch Hunt!’
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/03/trump-taunts-jeff-sessions-for-senate-race-flop-didnt-have-courage-to-end-russia-witch-hunt/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3874
Prominent Republicans mock Trump’s legal claims in Supreme Court brief — and
debunk president’s ‘absolute immunity’
A Supreme Court filing lays bare the deep chasm between prominent Republicans who believe in the rule of law and
wannabe president for life Donald Trump, whose says he enjoys absolute immunity from any inquiry into his conduct.
Trump audaciously claims that any crimes he may have committed crimes before assuming office cannot even be investigated, not even if he committed murder,
prominent Republicans argue that Trump cannot block the Manhattan district attorney’s garden variety criminal tax fraud investigation. They note that the issue before the high court is a subpoena for business records held by Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA. The firm says it will comply with the subpoena, but Trump’s lawsuit blocked that.
Trump is a man without principles or scruples, and the Republicans are warning the court not to enable Trump or any future president who lacks respect for the rule of law.
Trump, the Republican brief states,
“asks this Court to depart radically” from the principle that no one is above the law
“by holding that
criminal investigations may not touch the president’s affairs in any way,
even when those investigations require nothing at all from the president.
This extraordinary assertion is not based on any specific claim of privilege, but rather on a sweeping claim of absolute immunity.
There is no principled reason to depart from the Court’s historical approach and create such a far-reaching, per se rule shielding all of the president’s unofficial affairs from criminal investigation.”
“Trump’s assertions of absolute immunity from process while in office—
and more generally,
his arguments against accountability in any forum—
could impose lasting damage on our cons utional system of checks and balances
as well as on the rule of law.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/03/pro..._campaign=3874
Chief Justice condemns Schumer for criticizing two justices —
but was utterly silent when Trump did the same
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/03/chi...e+Raw+Story%29
Federalism bad for Republicans now.
No principles, just raw power and fingers in the wind.
... giving their cult base just enough, in campaigning, in theory, to get their votes, then ignores them once in power because their real source of power is the $Bs from the oligarchy, not from voters.
The Criminal: “do not protect criminals- the way the Senate protected me and covered up my crimes by not allowing witnesses or any evidence. Do not protect criminals unless - that criminal is me!”
Republicans tell the Supreme Court to force Trump to turn over his taxes
Republicans are demanding that the Supreme Court stand up for the Manhattan District Attorney’s office as it fights for subpoenas of President Donald Trump’s taxes.
Newsweek reported that
37 Republicans have signed onto a brief demanding the High Court uphold the DA.
The brief was filed Monday by the Republicans, including former members of Congress and the Executive Branch as well as notorious Trump antagonists George Conway and John Dean.
they “are concerned that
President Trump’s assertions of absolute immunity from process, while in office –
and more generally his arguments against accountability in any forum –
could impose lasting damage on our cons utional system of checks and balances as well as on the rule of law.”
Trump’s lawyers are
demanding the court “depart radically from that principle by holding that criminal investigations may not touch the president’s affairs in any way,
even when those investigations require nothing at all from the president.”
The case they reference is part of a grand jury investigation into alleged payments Trump made to women
he allegedly had affairs with.
Federal judges have already ruled against Trump,
which is why it’s now appearing before the court, who will hear oral arguments March 31.
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/03/republicans-tell-the-supreme-court-to-force-trump-to-turn-over-his-taxes/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3893&re cip_id=298460&list_id=1
5-4 in favor of Trash?
always crying and twisting facts in favor of your lib narrative. always!
you dont find it hypocritical that the criminal in chief is saying “do not protect criminals?”
lol
nah because i don't have Trump Derangement Syndrome like you and many other mentally ill re s on the left.
your avatar and constant defending of trump despite not claiming to be right wing says otherwise
I JUST HATE THE LIBS, THAT'S WHY HE'S MY HERO.
still crying you pussy? my av is there to trigger weak s like you and i suppose it's working quite well.
boo inghoo paralegal
i was a liberal before you radicals, not necessarily you, took over. thanks for showing me the light!
you were a liberal who now has trump derangement syndrome
nah, i'm a realist who really wants you weak spineless hacks to lose and lose big! i want your party to die! weak losers like yourself paralegal.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)