Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

**Reck** · 03-21-2018

Reck, why are you so bad at doing a google search?

Both the OIG and FBI OPR reports concluded that Mr. McCabe had made an unauthorized disclosure to the news media and lacked candor — including under oath — on multiple occasions.

You are taking their word for it. The rest of us actually want to see the report where it says how and in what manner he did so.

**TSA** · 03-21-2018

Originally Posted by Reck

You are taking their word for it. The rest of us actually want to see the report where it says how and in what manner he did so.

Why would I not take the word from offices headed by an Obama and Mueller appointee?

**RandomGuy** · 03-21-2018

Originally Posted by TSA

You're so wrong

We aren't taking the word of the Trump administration on McCabe lying under oath, we are taking the word of the OIG (Obama appointee) and the FBI OPR (Mueller appointee).

McCabe says he was singled out for investigation because of what he knew about Comey. The administration ultimately got to decide what do to about that investigation.

Pointing to the people who conducted it as if that changes WHY he was fired is yet another stupid ing red herring, you obfuscating dip .

**TSA** · 03-21-2018

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

McCabe says he was singled out for investigation because of what he knew about Comey. The administration ultimately got to decide what do to about that investigation.

Pointing to the people who conducted it as if that changes WHY he was fired is yet another stupid ing red herring, you obfuscating dip .

Would you expect the DOJ to ignore the recommendation of the OIG and FBI OPR?

**TSA** · 03-21-2018

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

McCabe says he was singled out for investigation because of what he knew about Comey. The administration ultimately got to decide what do to about that investigation.

Pointing to the people who conducted it as if that changes WHY he was fired is yet another stupid ing red herring, you obfuscating dip .

The OIG investigation has been going on since Jan 2017...McCabe is just bitter and grasping for straws at this point.

**Chris** · 03-21-2018

TSA steamrolling nigs

not too hard imo these people are so misinformed /uninformed

**spurraider21** · 03-21-2018

i dont doubt mccabe contributed to the leaks to the WSJ, and that there were valid grounds to fire him. there are legit questions that maybe they went out of their way to find cause to fire him. speculation at this point. disgruntled fired employee will always have complaints about firing

i do doubt the accuracy of nunes' paraphrase of mccabe's closed-door testimony which has been challenged by other people present in that hearing and mccabe himself. could have easily taken a quote from the tx, but opted not to, and have take no steps to making that tx public

**Reck** · 03-21-2018

Originally Posted by TSA

Why would I not take the word from offices headed by an Obama and Mueller appointee?

Because there are conflicting reports. What the OIG report says is not what McCabe is saying.

For someone who likes transparency, you sure are giving them a pass on this. McCabe had his due process crushed. He had none. And what's worse, the general public is still in the dark about the whole deal.

If McCabe did violate some laws and rules, then he will pay and I will be right there with you in saying bring charges. But this thing has been one sided from the start. The Trump admin operates in the dark and that should worry everyone.