Reply With Quote
I'm a fan of Wallace, too.
I did.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/u...n-hacking.html
"The F.B.I. is conducting a wide-ranging counterintelligence investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election, and is examining alleged links between Mr. Trump’s associates and the Russian government."
I'm a fan of Wallace, too.
I wish he would moderate every debate from here on out. He is the person I wanted to vote for after the third debate.
72% but who's counting.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...me-up-clinton/
Breaking:
FBI is now launching a full investigation on NASA for potentially staging the moon landings.
Hmmm, I remember it being 67% that morning, maybe it changed later in the day. Still, 72% is no guaranteed win. It wasn't anything like the almost certain win he projected for Obama over Romney in 2012.
no, it would be completely out of character for Donald Trump to be extremely arrogant to the point where he'd go boasting about when he oughta keep his mouth shut. He'd neeeeeeeeever do that.
Washington Post Calls For House Investigation To Be Stopped, Nunes To Be Investigated.
From the Washington Post Editorial Board:
He insisted that those who described those contacts to the press be tracked down and prosecuted.
He demanded that FBI Director James B. Comey confirm that such revelations “violate . . . a section of the Espionage Act that criminalizes the disclosure of information concerning the communication and intelligence activities of the United States.”
…
His committee’s investigation should be halted immediately — and Mr. Nunes deserves to be subject to the same leaking probe he demanded for the previous disclosures.
...
He was simply doing everything in his power to protect President Trump, for whom he has become a fierce, if erratic, guard dog.
...
It is time to discuss the formation of an independent, nonpartisan commission with full subpoena power, like those that investigated the attacks of 9/11 and the intelligence failures in Iraq. In the meantime, House leaders should put an end to the embarrassing travesty being directed by Mr. Nunes.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/3...e-Investigated
I would think that a significant plurality in the party would prefer Pence.
Following the debates she was destroying him. Polls tightened towards the end particularly after Comey made the emails an issue again in the final weeks.
Plenty of places wrote about the dynamic. People that act like the media is monolithic (except muh right wing sites of course!) are the real problem.
From Russia, With Oil
The “Mayflower Meeting” was an April 27th meeting at the Mayflower Hotel,
It is not clear precisely what was discussed at this meeting, but several things are known for certain.
written by Russian lobbyist Richard Burt, Trump promised to “make a deal under my administration that’s great for America but also good for Russia.”
The meeting was a 24-person “ tail hour” held in the Mayflower’s VIP Senate Room.
Trump was there, and according to Heilbrunn, so were
(now Attorney-General) Jeff Sessions,
Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner,
Trump’s previous campaign chair Corey Lewandowski,
Iran-Contra figure (!) Bud McFarlane, and
Paul Manafort.
Also present were four ambassadors — from Russia, Italy, Singapore, and the Philippines—and
key figures from Rosneft, Russia’s state oil company.
(The Philippines are one of Rosneft’s primary expansion targets for coming years.)
Between December 5th and 7th of 2016, 19.5% of Rosneft was sold through a labyrinth of s companies to parties unknown.
The key brokers in this deal were Singapore, Italy, and the Qatari company Gencore, which on December 10th stated that it had received 0.54% of the company as its fee for facilitating the deal.
What was particularly surprising about this number was that
back in July of 2016, the Steele Dossier reported that Putin had offered Trump 19% of Rosneft in exchange for lifting U.S. sanctions on Russia.
While there has been a great deal of talk about how nobody should trust the Steele Dossier, it’s very curious that the exact amount of the missing Rosneft shares was described publicly by this dossier five months before the deal.https://medium.com/@yonatanzunger/fr...cc5#.eyj94meqx
The allegation is an explicit quid pro quo:
Trump would as President further Russian interests,
eliminating oil sanctions and
ratifying Russian control of parts of Ukraine,
in exchange for 19% of Rosneft and
Russian intelligence assistance in winning the election.
Mayflower meeting in April
A few weeks later, Assange starts leaking stuff on Hillary, weekly, strategically, to cut her traction.
Assange (and Comey) hand PVL Trash the WH in Nov
19.5% of Rosneft sold in Dec to unknown party
botox still referencing the Steele dossier
Copy/paste bot back on duty
Doubt you are even capable of copy and paste. Nevertheless, you ain't deflecting nothing. You will take the sandwich and eat it.Copy/paste bot back on duty
Trash called IC Nazis, so they have special motivation to pull no punches
Nunes getting thrown under the bus already.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
