Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[TSA]

How many pages will pizza thread go?

what does this art imply

Go without what?

[TSA]

Are you a hypocrite?

Sure. We are all hypocrites at one point or another.

It's cute watching you jump into conversations not directed at you to bring up something from months ago.

[clambake]

What did Kushner eat for breakfast this morning?

You now see how stupid your question was.

as if kushner doesn't eat pizza.

please

[TSA]

as if kushner doesn't eat pizza.

please

1/10 and only because you said please

[clambake]

you gonna take my name, pepe?

[spurraider21]

Go without what?

Charges against podestas/clintons/alefantis

[spurraider21]

Sure. We are all hypocrites at one point or another.

It's cute watching you jump into conversations not directed at you to bring up something from months ago.

This is a public thread not a pm stream. I'm equally skeptical of all the "boom" material. But I find it ridiculous you (apparently consciously) hold different standards for these claims from the pizza claims

[TSA]

This is a public thread not a pm stream. I'm equally skeptical of all the "boom" material. But I find it ridiculous you (apparently consciously) hold different standards for these claims from the pizza claims

I never claimed Podesta/Clinton/Alefantis would be charged with anything nor did I accuse them of doing anything, unlike djohn2008. I find it ridiculous that even needed to be pointed out to you.

[boutons_deux]

WHY FBI CAN’T TELL ALL ON TRUMP, RUSSIA

The Federal Bureau of Investigation cannot tell us what we need to know about Donald Trump’s contacts with Russia.

Why?

Because doing so would jeopardize a long-running, ultra-sensitive operation targeting mobsters tied to Russian President Vladimir Putin — and to Trump.

But the Feds’ stonewalling risks something far more dangerous: Failing to resolve a crisis of trust in America’s president.

WhoWhatWhy provides the details of a two-month investigation in this 6,500-word exposé.

The FBI apparently knew, directly or indirectly, based upon available facts, that prior to Election Day, Trump and his campaign had personal and business dealings with certain individuals and en ies linked to criminal elements — including reputed Russian gangsters — connected to Putin.

The same facts suggest that the FBI knew or should have known enough prior to the election to justify informing the public about its ongoing investigation of potentially compromising relationships between Trump, Putin, and Russian mobsters — even if it meant losing or exposing a valued informant.

http://whowhatwhy.org/2017/03/27/fbi...-trump-russia/

[clambake]

he's very busy. he has to research the origin of the "dear leader" moniker and report back where it came from, who said it, who is saying it, and attach names to his brown nose report.

[TSA]

he's very busy. he has to research the origin of the "dear leader" moniker and report back where it came from, who said it, who is saying it, and attach names to his brown nose report.

you produce very little for trying so hard

[clambake]

thin crust please

[clambake]

you produce very little for trying so hard

oh you gave up on that?

quitter

[TSA]

WHY FBI CAN’T TELL ALL ON TRUMP, RUSSIA

The Federal Bureau of Investigation cannot tell us what we need to know about Donald Trump’s contacts with Russia.

Why?

Because doing so would jeopardize a long-running, ultra-sensitive operation targeting mobsters tied to Russian President Vladimir Putin — and to Trump.

But the Feds’ stonewalling risks something far more dangerous: Failing to resolve a crisis of trust in America’s president.

WhoWhatWhy provides the details of a two-month investigation in this 6,500-word exposé.

The FBI apparently knew, directly or indirectly, based upon available facts, that prior to Election Day, Trump and his campaign had personal and business dealings with certain individuals and en ies linked to criminal elements — including reputed Russian gangsters — connected to Putin.

The same facts suggest that the FBI knew or should have known enough prior to the election to justify informing the public about its ongoing investigation of potentially compromising relationships between Trump, Putin, and Russian mobsters — even if it meant losing or exposing a valued informant.

http://whowhatwhy.org/2017/03/27/fbi...-trump-russia/

"In his March 20 testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, FBI Director James Comey said that he could not go into detail about its probe into the Trump administration’s Russian connection.

If he had, we might have learned that, for more than three decades the FBI has had Trump Tower in its sights."

And the FBI held on to 30 years worth of damning information until after he was elected

[spurraider21]

I never claimed Podesta/Clinton/Alefantis would be charged with anything nor did I accuse them of doing anything, unlike djohn2008. I find it ridiculous that even needed to be pointed out to you.

If you didn't accuse them of doing good anything why did you think acosta would name drop them?

[djohn2oo8]

Damn Nunes. So now people can go in the white house unauthorized?

[djohn2oo8]

The committee you kept in the dark?

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

This kind of is not helping his cause

[TSA]

What is the committee investigating? Russian interference

Did Nunes source reveal anything having to do with the Russian investigation? No

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

What is the committee investigating? Russian interference

Did Nunes source reveal anything having to do with the Russian investigation? No

You are so ing stupid

[djohn2oo8]

So why is Nunes still hiding that info from his committee TSA?

[djohn2oo8]

[TSA]

So why is Nunes still hiding that info from his committee TSA?

The committee investigating Russian interference? Probably because Nunes flat out stated what he saw had nothing to do with the investigation into Russian interference.