Not YET a criminal target
Not YET a criminal target
Yes. Criminal investigation but a subject as of now. That can and will change.
Sorry djohn. The Russia probe is a counterintelligence investigation.
Sorry TSA. Special Counsel office directly called it a criminal investigation.
So you are saying you know more than the guy who gets direct statements from the guy conducting the investigation? Neat.
What's great about all of this. Trump either now has to sit with Mueller or face a grand jury. Lordy!
It doesn’t matter what the spokesman calls it, it matters what Rosenstein said when he appointed Mueller. I keep linking it and you ignore it. If it was a criminal investigation Mueller would not have the authority to investigate any other matters that arose and any other matters within the scope.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-re...67231/download
Criminal investigations start with a crime and person/persons accused of the crime. You are actually happy its a counterintelligence investigation you just didn’t know that’s why Mueller has free reign.
I'd love to say Pavlov, but I think djohn is a sure fire pick
Delusional
Mueller's own office called it a criminal investigation. Why? Because as Special Counsel, Mueller has the power and authority to bring criminal charges which he has done. Obstruction of justice is a crime, which Mueller is investigation Trump for. You are an eternal idiot.
So is Roger Stone in the clear now that Mueller is moving on to Trump?
Chris doesn't know wha multi tasking is.
HE'S INVESTIGATING TRUMP. HOW CAN HE POSSIBLY ALSO BE LOOKING INTO OTHER MATTERS? MY BRAIN!
impression
takeaway
may be
seems
didn’t get to ask
and Graham good now
Is TSA trying to argue that it's better for the President of the United States to be the subject of a federal counterintelligence investigation?
lol
Do you think Mueller is going to crack Stone?
I don't know.
What is your definition of McCarthyism.
Merriam-Webster is good enough for me.
What is your definition of Russian collusion?
Post it and show how it applies to Mueller's investigation of Stone.
A candidate's son, son-in-law and campaign manager meeting with Russians who claim to have "do ents and information that would incriminate" that candidate's opponent.What is your definition of Russian collusion?
Just a hypothetical example.
That's for you to figure out.
What should they be charged with?A candidate's son, son-in-law and campaign manager meeting with Russians who claim to have "do ents and information that would incriminate" that candidate's opponent.
Just a hypothetical example.
I accept your white flag.
Dunno. Totally worth investigating though. Not McCarthyism in the least. Only a complete idiot would try to make that comparison.What should they be charged with?
Why is it worth investigating if no crime was committed? (never compared your hypothetical to McCarthyism btw only an idiot would fabricate that comparison. Oops!)
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)