not only that...
a republican fisa judge then reviewed ALL the evidence, notes, facts, investigative findings -
and decided to approve it.
4 TIMES - 4 REPUBLICAN JUDGES - had to approve EVERYTHING and they did
when they weighed the fact that a democrat was involved in investigating a republican and that republicans who hated trump had actually started the first part of the dossier = the republican judges did not clutch their pearls like the trump cult and the gop did -
they just weighed the findings and ruled correctly under the law. It was not a big deal who started and who ended up funding it.
What was important was the fact that the evidence suggested that the people conspiring with russians - needed to be investigated -
for the purposes of National Security.
Chris posts multiple "true pundit" articles saying Flynn will withdraw his plea or have it vacated.
Now plays dumb about it.
Chris is a liar.
He can't help it.
Never said such.
excuse me. it was TSA talking about the plea withdrawal.
but you do have several posts about the plea being vacated by the court.
but the end result is the same, Flynn no longer having a guilty plea. yesterday the judge asked him if he wanted to change his guilty plea. he said no
Rick Wilson got it wrong. It was the non-release of the original 302's which would mean Mueller suppressed evidence that was possibly conducive to Flynn.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule
Lol Flynn already admitted he wasn’t tricked.
Was traveling all day, tbh... did the charges get dropped already?
Just the opposite. Right wing echo chambers are scrambling for new narrative and their followers are waiting for marching orders to carry the new narrative forward.
So guilty plea not withdrawn...
I remember a simpler time when certain posters were scoffing at MAJOR TROUBLE. How the times change ...
Whatever dude, I don’t see you posting Blade Runner infused tweets from your sweet law office in Trump Tower
This was a ty day for Flynn no matter how anyone spins it.
He's in more jeopardy now. Not less.
fantastic self own tbh... thanks for the summary, technofrog
- Flynn's lawyer said the FBI had no obligation to to warn Flynn that lying to the FBI is a crime
- Flynn's lawyer said there is no contention that Flynn was entrapped by the FBI ( muh perjury trap)
- Flynn's lawyer said the recent memo they filed is only to point out that the aggravating cir stances in the Papa and Van der Zwaan cases (lawyer present, informed that its a crime to lie) are not present here, and that should be considered during sentencing. NOT that it in any way casts doubt as to the validity of the guilty plea.
- Judge said, verbatim "I am satisfied that Mr. Flynn entered his guilty plea while competent and capable. He understood at that time the nature of the charges against him and the consequences of pleading guilty. Having carefully read all the materials provided to the Court in this case, including those materials reviewed under seal and in-camera, I conclude that there was and remains to be a factual basis for Mr. Flynn's plea of guilty. As such, there's no reason to reject his guilty plea and I'll, therefore, move on to the sentencing phase.
thinking this is good news for Flynn and that his case is going to be tossed
Yes you're still an idiot
That's it, get it broke off in your ass and then try to play it off.
Half to you folks say is misguided. Most of the time the truth is right there if you just open your eyes. So many of you are looking for confirmation bias that it's almost cookie cutter responses from different usernames.
Ah the macho pillow talk. We know it well who linger here.
The towel snapping in the locker room never gets old.:
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)