Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

[Winehole23]

Dude, why are you posting the same info over and over?

[LkrFan]

LkrFan

Roger Stone = fcked

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

Dude, why are you posting the same info over and over?

Go look at the first page when everybody thought all this was impossible

[djohn2oo8]

Scalps are to be collected

[Spurs Homer]

Dude, why are you posting the same info over and over?

Trump receiving info on stolen materials from russia/wikileaks- to help trump/hurt another american citizen-

then lying about it for years and getting away with the crime

is bothersome to hear- isnt it?

[djohn2oo8]

stones lawyer is awful

[djohn2oo8]

Trump receiving info on stolen materials from russia/wikileaks- to help trump/hurt another american citizen-

then lying about it for years and getting away with the crime

is bothersome to hear- isnt it?

But he won’t get away with it. Mueller’s team is proving a conspiracy in court first

[Spurs Homer]

But he won’t get away with it. Mueller’s team is proving a conspiracy in court first

maybe

what would be useful- is if the impotent Dems subpoenaed the lawyer in the stone trial ( mueller team atty) and spelled out these crimes on nat’l tv

otherwise- trump gets away for another year

and continues committing crimes from the office of the presidency

mueller dropped the ing ball in so many ways

the patriots testifying in the impeachment are showing the balls - mueller never had

[djohn2oo8]

maybe

what would be useful- is if the impotent Dems subpoenaed the lawyer in the stone trial ( mueller team atty) and spelled out these crimes on nat’l tv

otherwise- trump gets away for another year

and continues committing crimes from the office of the presidency

mueller dropped the ing ball in so many ways

the patriots testifying in the impeachment are showing the balls - mueller never had

Think about it. To prove a criminal conspiracy, Wikileaks needs to first be indicted. Stone already is. So is Assange.

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

lawd have mercy.

[Spurs Homer]

Think about it. To prove a criminal conspiracy, Wikileaks needs to first be indicted. Stone already is. So is Assange.

yes - but that is settling for scraps when you were already at the buffet table;

your suspect was the biggest liar on the planet and you had the chance to place the liar under oath and blow the entire case wide open in front of the world-

all that stood between you and glory - was an obscure memo?
a ing department policy?

You could have rescued the country from Russia and their plant and their cyber ery-

and you obeyed a ing memo, tucked your tail between your vagina and called it a day- allowing the ing liar to sodomize an entire country and then the very next day-


do it all over again?


think about THAT!

[djohn2oo8]

yes - but that is settling for scraps when you were already at the buffet table;

your suspect was the biggest liar on the planet and you had the chance to place the liar under oath and blow the entire case wide open in front of the world-

all that stood between you and glory - was an obscure memo?
a ing department policy?

You could have rescued the country from Russia and their plant and their cyber ery-

and you obeyed a ing memo, tucked your tail between your vagina and called it a day- allowing the ing liar to sodomize an entire country and then the very next day-


do it all over again?


think about THAT!

Barr said no to an indictment. So the cases were referred to other US attorneys for prosecution so Barr can’t touch it. He wouldn’t sign off on an indictment. Is that not yet clear?

[Spurs Homer]

Barr said no to an indictment. So the cases were referred to other US attorneys for prosecution so Barr can’t touch it. He wouldn’t sign off on an indictment. Is that not yet clear?

SO?

If MUeller had a pair of balls- he would have exposed Barr and his criminality.

[Winehole23]

You guys still don't seem to get that no charges will be laid to DJT until he's out of office.

No legal hail marys are available. All the derogatory information about DJT that shakes out of legal process amounts to a hill of beans unless (R)s vote for removal because of it or Trump is voted out, at which point he becomes indictable.

Btw, the surmise that Barr has no sway over AUSAs is ridiculous -- why do you think he's called the Attorney General?

[TSA]

LAWDY!!!!

2 days prior Julian Assange was on CNN saying Wikileaks had more damaging information on Hillary Clinton. And Gates testified he heard about the Wikileaks announcement on TV

[TSA]

But he won’t get away with it. Mueller’s team is proving a conspiracy in court first

Mueller already said there was no conspiracy and Corsi was lying to Stone about having a back channel to Wikileaks.

https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/do...-offense/3324/

but keep going with this it provides plenty of entertainment

[djohn2oo8]

Mueller didn’t say there wasn’t a conspiracy. He said his investigation didn’t uncover one. Because to prove a conspiracy, involves convictions. He also said there should be a thorough FBI investigation into Trump.

[djohn2oo8]

Btw, Stone isn’t the last one going to prison.

[TSA]

Mueller didn’t say there wasn’t a conspiracy. He said his investigation didn’t uncover one. Because to prove a conspiracy, involves convictions. He also said there should be a thorough FBI investigation into Trump.

Your entire Trump/Wikileaks conspiracy is based on Corsi having a back channel to Wikileaks. Mueller said he lied to Stone and he didn't. Are you now saying your God Mueller was wrong the whole time?

https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/do...-offense/3324/

Again, what does page 4 #7 say about Corsi? Stone is who person 1 is referring to.

[TSA]

Also where is my 2 grand you welching got