Reply With Quote
So they requested an unmasking because they knew who it was?
everything the breathless right wing twitterverse posts makes less sense than the last thing they posted.
So they requested an unmasking because they knew who it was?
Making up some because the actual email is a huge nothingburger.
What is there to tell? It was a disaster for Nunes. Nothing was in there. Nothing came off it.
And Nunes was embarrassed.
You must be thinking of the Schiff memo. How was it a disaster for Nunes?
You didn't get it.
"Reading between the lines"You didn't get it.
This post got a lot of potential. To backfire per par.
If the judge doesn't roll your way, sidestep the judge and demand emergency relief.
Guy who lied to the FBI and Vice President is in the process of having his criminal case tossed because he has powerful friends (and would be pardoned anyway if unsuccessful) is such a victim
this whole act is a transparent attempt to create degrees of separation for trump.
i didn’t pardon him, his case was thrown out because deep state were meanies.
and even if this route is unsuccessful, this act is meant to create sympathy so the eventual pardon seems less egregious
I struggle to see how any of the evidence is “exonerating” because none of the evidence dispels the notion that he lied to investigators
Flynn said he didn't lie to investigators and only plead guilty because they threatened to go after his son and bury him in legal fees. There's never been any evidence produced showing Flynn lied to investigators, the original 302 is mysteriously "lost" and the 302 produced was written 3 weeks after the interview and then heavily edited by both Strzok and Page. Flynn nor his lawyers have ever been shown where he lied, he was told he lied by the SCO.
we know he lied to Pence about the same thing around the same time period. we know he told the court TWICE that he lied. now he's saying he lied to the court. the guy's a liar.
yes. its called memorializing a conversation. i do it all the time in my job any time we have a conference call.
Do you memorialize a conversation you weren’t present for 15 days later?
i dont know about 15 days later, but yes. if one of the partners had a meeting/conference call/hearing and has hand written notes, not uncommon to brief somebody else and have them generate a written memo
but Rice wasn't in the meeting?
Three years in and you're just figuring out what a memo is.
And Gleeson co-authored the WaPo op-ed as well
What a ing clown shown, Sullivan is tanking his reputation here.
And Gleeson co-authored the WaPo op-ed as well
What a ing clown shown, Sullivan is tanking his reputation here.
seeing as judge sullivan wanted an opposition brief to the motion, it would make a lot of sense to select somebody who actually opposes the motion
And Gleeson co-authored the WaPo op-ed as well
What a ing clown shown, Sullivan is tanking his reputation here.
how is that tanking his reputation? if i wanted a legitimate opposition brief, i would go out of my way to find a lawyer/judge who disagrees with the motion, that's literally the point
imagine if he wanted an amicus brief from some lawyer at judicial watch
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
