Reply With Quote
I'm sorry this is happening to you.
No one is going to care.
I'm sorry this is happening to you.
Sorry that no one caring about your conspiracy theory is happening to me?
K
oh yeah "conspiracy theory" "no one cares"Sorry that no one caring about your conspiracy theory is happening to me?
You care a lot. You are right here caring rn.
should they get sized for jumpsuits?
hahahahaha!
Honestly I lost the actual thread of the conspiracy theory.
Maybe you could explain what the big news is today without breathless right wing tweets?
Why would I do that. You don't care. No one cares.
Right?
So you can't do it.
OK.
Because this isn't your average case, it goes directly to perceived political favoritism from the DOJ/POTUS.
This is exactly why Sullivan will conduct that line of questioning.
Russia good now? You already fell for Guccifer 2.0 and you didn't learn anything then?
The does that have to do with anything you just quoted? You believed for years that Trump colluded with Russia and it turns out it was your who girl colluded with Russia all along. I’m sorry this is happening to you tbh.
Det properly predicated investigation thingy.
You quoted a story from a well known Russian disinfo report. You keep falling for it.
I never claimed the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. Quote, link?
Sorry this is happening to you.
It doesn't matter how you feel about it, it's how the judge feels about it.
I'm on the record that Sullivan will drop the case, however, there's various ways he can do so, including without prejudice, which would be difficult for Flynn in the case a new administration shows up next January.
That’s not how I feel about, that’s how the DOJ feels about it, and that’s all that matters.
This story is a well known Russian disinfo report?
https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/29...cials-knew-it/
And why would you feel sorry for any of this happening to me? I’ve been on the right side of this from the start and am vindicated more and more with each passing week.
No it isn't. Otherwise the case would've been dismissed already. As the Circuit Court told the DOJ, they can't go around the Judge.
Yes, it is. The Russian report predates this administration and was deemed not credible, since Russia was indeed torpedoing Clinton's campaign with fake news at the time (as Mueller demonstrated later on).
No you have not. You've been jumping the gun from the very start. IE: you ate hook, line and sinker the whole BOOM from Guccifer 2.0 during the run up to the previous election (do you need the links?), which turned out to be a front for the GRU.
I'm sorry you keep getting played. One would think that you learned your lesson with that, Comet Ping Pong, Lisa Page etc... but apparently not...
You aren’t even talking about the correct subject of conversation.
I suggest you take the time to read and digest the release from Ratcliffe today. Your girl was behind this from the start. The Russians knew it and took advantage of it. Your girl hired a washed up investigator who was paying Russian agents who were taking advantage of him. Your girl literally colluded with Russia to sway the election. The FBI knew and hid all of this and then went and illegally obtained FISA’s. All in an attempt to get Trump. Again, I’m sorry this is happening to you.
You point to ONE thing as evidence I was not on the right side of calling the whole Trump/Russia collusion bull from the very start?You’re usually a straight shooter but these comments just show you’re inner butthurt.
Except it’s not the DOJ going around the court in dismissing. It’s the right of the DOJ to dismiss. Sullivan will dismiss or be slapped down by the Supreme Court and they’ll dismiss. Either way it was DOJ’s call from the start.
it's not the DOJ's unilateral call to dismiss though, requires leave of court
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
