Reply With Quote
Damn, this whole thing went right over your pointed head. Wrong again columbo.you trusted the word of said spy for years
You were all in on Q.Nope not talking about you. You are the only one I can recall that didn't get caught up in the hype believing that Trump was an agent of Russia.
"not lost on any of us"
There is no "us" there is only you who didn't believe the hoax. I will continue to laugh at those who did, and you should do the same.
And Pizzagate.
And Silsby.
And Guccifer 2.0.
And Seth Rich.
And Crystal Level.
And pedo menus.
And adrenochrome.
And child sex dungeons.
And KimDotcom.
And what does this art mean the you?
(Partial list.)
Damn, this whole thing went right over your pointed head. Wrong again columbo.
clears throatNope not talking about you. You are the only one I can recall that didn't get caught up in the hype believing that Trump was an agent of Russia.
"not lost on any of us"
There is no "us" there is only you who didn't believe the hoax. I will continue to laugh at those who did, and you should do the same.
Who was Danchenko's source?Damn, this whole thing went right over your pointed head. Wrong again columbo.
You're a permanent fence sitter you can stop clearing your throat and sit back down.
cope
so mad that i dont immediately jump aboard conspiracy theories, whether they're the "good ones" (pizzagate, q) or the "bad ones" (peepee tapes). i let processes play out and facts be learned. call that fence sitting if you want
This is fun.
trashing ST RWNJs is easier than clubbing baby seals
Why would I be mad at you being a fence sitter? It is what it is.cope
so mad that i dont immediately jump aboard conspiracy theories, whether they're the "good ones" (pizzagate, q) or the "bad ones" (peepee tapes). i let processes play out and facts be learned. call that fence sitting if you want
Who is Charles Dolan Jr?
if your definition of fence sitting is not jumping all-in on any conspiracy theories without knowledge of the facts, sure
The Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy theory was already in shambles and with Dachenko's recent arrest it's completely crumbled. Quite a few new facts were presented in the indictment but I'm not sure I've seen you comment on them.if your definition of fence sitting is not jumping all-in on any conspiracy theories without knowledge of the facts, sure
What are your thoughts on finding out Christopher Steele was being fed allegations by a long time Clinton advisor?
When do you plan on going through this thread and pointing out all the hilariously bogus claims from your side or do you not do the your side thing?
i have on djohn quite a bit tbh
we knew the steele dossier was meant to be a political hit job
quite a bit more than djohn to on yet you haven't...why?
Innocent people's lives were ruined. Illegal FISA warrants were obtained. This went way past a political hit job.
The problem is that you're turning into the people you're laughing at. That's the irony.Nope not talking about you. You are the only one I can recall that didn't get caught up in the hype believing that Trump was an agent of Russia.
"not lost on any of us"
There is no "us" there is only you who didn't believe the hoax. I will continue to laugh at those who did, and you should do the same.
According to the OIG, there was nothing illegal about the obtained FISA warrants. Not having all the i's dotted and t's crossed doesn't automatically make them illegal.
who else. spurs homer who i on until i got bored and put him on ignore? djohn is the main one who kept posting BOOM links and predicting prison. ive had boutons on ignore since before the trump administration.
whose lives were ruined?
still unsure what your problem is
but - rent free I guess…
According to the FISC they lacked probable cause and warrants were invalid.
https://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/...0%20200123.pdf
Is this what you call not having all the i's dottd and t's crossed?
"The errors in the FISA applications on Carter Page were significant and serious. They were not, in my experience, the kind of errors you would expect to find in every case. ... It’s not acceptable to rely on a Confidential Human Source and then not check with his FBI handler in describing his bona fides to the FISA Court. It’s not acceptable to omit some potentially exculpatory recorded statements made by the FISA target to a source. It’s not acceptable to leave unresolved credibility and perhaps factual disputes between a key source and his primary subsource. It’s not acceptable, after closing the key source, to continue to get information from him through an Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) staffer, thereby effectively treating him as a subsource of the ODAG staffer. And it’s certainly not acceptable for an FBI attorney to alter an email from another intelligence community agency as to whether the other agency had contact with the FISA target or treated him as a source. (Internal citations omitted."
You just jump aboard when there's several other posters who have jumped aboard, then you try to sound pithy and slink back into the crowd.cope
so mad that i dont immediately jump aboard conspiracy theories, whether they're the "good ones" (pizzagate, q) or the "bad ones" (peepee tapes). i let processes play out and facts be learned. call that fence sitting if you want
You're forever tagging in on arguments with nothing to lose.
Poster B tags in to defend TSA by accusing someone else of tag-teaming.
You can't make up this lack of self awareness.
He says from an alt he created to sock puppet support his own threads
As usual you have nothing but the same tired, unrelated retorts.He says from an alt he created to sock puppet support his own threads
It's okay to just not respond if you've got nothing.
Yes, that's exactly what I mean. Notice that "not valid" does not equal "illegal", and neither the OIG nor that do ent you linked to refer to them as illegal.According to the FISC they lacked probable cause and warrants were invalid.
https://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/...0%20200123.pdf
Is this what you call not having all the i's dottd and t's crossed?
"The errors in the FISA applications on Carter Page were significant and serious. They were not, in my experience, the kind of errors you would expect to find in every case. ... It’s not acceptable to rely on a Confidential Human Source and then not check with his FBI handler in describing his bona fides to the FISA Court. It’s not acceptable to omit some potentially exculpatory recorded statements made by the FISA target to a source. It’s not acceptable to leave unresolved credibility and perhaps factual disputes between a key source and his primary subsource. It’s not acceptable, after closing the key source, to continue to get information from him through an Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) staffer, thereby effectively treating him as a subsource of the ODAG staffer. And it’s certainly not acceptable for an FBI attorney to alter an email from another intelligence community agency as to whether the other agency had contact with the FISA target or treated him as a source. (Internal citations omitted."
You have to break a law to make anything illegal. ie: Clinesmith did break the law, and was tried, nobody else was.
You needed two accounts to say that?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
