Good thing Sussman didn't admit to lying to the Feds in court, not once, but twice... or he'll likely be looking for a pardon right now...
He got cucked pre-trial by the judge on trying to advance that narrative. He still pushed on, and got served the turd sandwich. C'est la vie.
If he can prove that connection, he should sue the Clinton campaign, Shillary, etc... we'll see what he does next.
Good thing Sussman didn't admit to lying to the Feds in court, not once, but twice... or he'll likely be looking for a pardon right now...
Translation "I can post mountains of unsubstantiated tweets about the right but need proof before I'll make a comment about the left"
I'll repeat my take since you seem to have missed it. Sharing oppo research with reporters is no big deal. Bull tipoffs to LE are unethical, but intentional deception can be hard to prove, Durham sure failed to in this case.
Keep nursing det grudge, tho.
You're a turd on the sidewalk, commenting about you isn't nursing a grudge, it's pointing out the on the sidewalk.
nope, no grudge there, just neutral description
And Chuncko continues with the personal attacks.
Let me try: Type-2 diabetes is a of an illness, amirite Chuncko!
A turd by any other name..
weird gaslighting, dude.
Bash report FOIA'd
Leaks to media, yes, but no improper unmasking requests by senior Obama officials.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...fficials-didnt“My review has uncovered no evidence that senior Executive Branch officials sought the disclosure of” the iden ies of US individuals “in disseminated intelligence reports for political purposes or other inappropriate reasons during the 2016 presidential-election period or the ensuing presidential-transition period,” Bash’s report said.
A central focus of the probe was the leak showing that Flynn had been in communication with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak prior to Trump’s inauguration, and whether Flynn’s involvement was revealed through an unmasking request from a government official.
But Bash’s review of unmasked intelligence reports about the calls found that the FBI did not in fact disseminate any that contained Flynn’s information, and that a single unmasked report that did contain Flynn’s information did not describe the calls between him and Kislyak. “For that reason, the public disclosure of the communications could not have resulted from an unmasking request,” Bash’s report concludes.
Intriguingly, the prosecutor did find that “the FBI shared transcripts of the relevant communications outside the Bureau without masking General Flynn’s name,” but notes that he did not investigate those incidents any further because “evaluating that dissemination, and determining how the information was provided to the media, is beyond the scope of this review.” No information about who shared those transcripts and who received them is contained in Bash’s report.
Not as weird as you needing to be on my nuts.
(DMC trolls freely in an open forum, as is proper, but whines and falls to name calling when he's the target. So tuff!)
Key findings of the bipartisan committee are front-loaded, hardly seems the nothingburger Trumpistas keep harping on.
https://int.nyt.com/data/do enttoo...35164/full.pdf
One juror said she hates Trump and couldnt be impartial if it related to him.
She made it on the jury.
Sounds like Durham is a ty lawyer tbh.
Durham objected to the jurors, but the judge overruled him. Totally legit guys
Did he? Or is this just excuse making after taking a vicious L?
this was in the can during the reign of El Trumpo, how odd it wasn't released to the public.
had to keep det narrative alive.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)