TSA thinks it was a show trial.
Durham just could've gone on Tucker and gotten a more effective result.
All he's done is fail.
some say the IG should get credit for Clinesmith
Baylor's next president.
Trump still looking for the "killers?"
comrade TSA - still fighting for mother russia - and still unable to see how trump is and will always be a ing traitor russian asset!
You will need to fill in the blanks on what acquitted means as tsa will not understand, just saying.
That's only part of the story. You neglected the part that when they were going to dig into Nolan, etc, they were told by the Mueller team not to, which is the part Techno made up
Technfg
So what laundry was aired publicly?
That Durham and his investigation has been a failure is pretty clear, what else? lmao
Not missing a thing, tbh.... but that was expected since Mueller took on all the big fish...
patriots.win having a normal one (formerly thedonald.win)
durham is losing on purpose as part of the cover-up!
Mueller investigation: 37 indictments, 7 guilty pleas or convictions, 14 criminal referrals.
Durham investigation: 1 guilty plea without jail time, 2 acquittals.
not to mention for mueller multiple were handed prison sentences
not to mention….
all the complicit traitors that lied for russia
the corrupt attorney general running interference
the corrupt use/shielding of the office of the presidency
the corrupt complicit GOP who also shielded the traitors and lied to the base about russia and is still lying to the base about the coup
TSA: Next Pizza up!
More like tsa will be in Korea, busy working 24/7 and without internet for several months.
sorry for your loss
that's exactly what I've been pointing out. You can't claim Mueller investigated the dossier when it told the FBI not to pursue it.
Technfg
HOROWITZ IS COMING
DURHAM IS COMING
end result, one guy pleads guilty to no jail time, 2 outright acquittals, and horowitz found there was proper factual predicate for the russia investigation
https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...urham-verdict/The jury in Danchenko’s case deliberated for about nine hours over two days. Juror Joel Greene said in an interview that there were no holdouts in the deliberations and that jurors were “pretty unanimous” in how they viewed the case.
“We looked at everything really closely,” said Greene, who declined to comment on the politics of the case. “The conclusion we reached was the conclusion we all were able to reach.”
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)